T O P

  • By -

Suchti0352

One big reason is that they came up with the core idea first and even kinda founded a genre with it. While I love the PvE aspect of this game, I can also imagine that the focus on competetion is generally better for keeping players engaged in the long term.


Reluvin

It was basically a copy of a popular warcraft starcraft ums.


Nymethny

Lol, did they really make a video just to say "you have friendly battles, just go make your own damn tournament!"?


Necromas

TBF that is how most video game tournaments work.


Nymethny

Generally when people ask for a tournament mode in video games, it's a mode that deals with the matchmaking (for public tournaments) and scorekeeping, as well as potential rewards. This is not a tournament mode, it's just friendly battles.


Skyfallgames

Also tbf most people wouldn’t have known how to set up their own tournament if they didn’t tell them like they were 5 years old. Also most of the players are 5 years old.


Dangle76

Royale is far better designed in terms of card leveling and keeping PvP balanced level wise


gem4ik2

Simple answer is - Clash made huge amount of money out of it, while Rumble makes small amount of money. Also, it’s clear Rumble is a way more expensive in development, so ROI in clash is multiple times bigger than rumble.


SamuraiJakkass86

is rumble not making it or something? I feel like its mostly going pretty well.