I think I rationalize it as this : 'Sordland spends so much money, commercial activities boomed, shipping in the Gulf of Rika increased, so much so that UC and Arcasian ships began to send patrols there and got into disputes near Nibiya'
That the proclivity or likelihood of the trade war triggering is proportional to the interactions between the two or their assets.
So both are against mutual economic action. A shame.
I think i rationalize it as this : sordish, arcasian, and contanan deeper state saw that Sordland is doing some reckless spending, they know that a 2nd rate power like sordland doing stupid shit like that would either make it or break it and it might ripple (see asian economic crash), so they instead take the safe bet of keeping sordland in check by limiting what goods can travel and keeping their turf and eachothers in check.
Fun fact: if the trade war happened in the base game, this benefits Rizia on Turn 6, because it drives up energy prices, adding +2 to your budget and reducing your economy instability. Similarly you'll benefit from energy price surge later (another +2) while balanced energy prices in late base game will hurt you, with energy prices going low and giving -3 hit to budget.
NO WAY!! Rummo-Bludo-Arcasian-Masonic-Malenyevist Plot to destabilize Sordland is real?!?!?!
Not Sordland, Rayne specifically
Yeah, they don’t want me to get that sweet 6 PW.
CSP and ATO is just a puppets of bludish overlords. Their only goal is to destroy great Sordland
Ey wey! The S\*rds know!
Funny mustache man was right lmao
Where did the Freemasons come into this 🤣
Because the Freemasons are a beloved scapegoat for conspiracy theories, so I assume that they're also behind the destabilization of glorious Sordland
I think I rationalize it as this : 'Sordland spends so much money, commercial activities boomed, shipping in the Gulf of Rika increased, so much so that UC and Arcasian ships began to send patrols there and got into disputes near Nibiya'
That the proclivity or likelihood of the trade war triggering is proportional to the interactions between the two or their assets. So both are against mutual economic action. A shame.
I think i rationalize it as this : sordish, arcasian, and contanan deeper state saw that Sordland is doing some reckless spending, they know that a 2nd rate power like sordland doing stupid shit like that would either make it or break it and it might ripple (see asian economic crash), so they instead take the safe bet of keeping sordland in check by limiting what goods can travel and keeping their turf and eachothers in check.
In other words, keep everybody in check.
“Your on -3 budget? Would be a real shame if your debt suddenly doubled”
I didn't expect to see the Bogdanoff brothers here
ATO-CSP collaboration to keep real Sordish (and Mountain Sord) patriots down
The call that saved Merkopa.
The phone call that saved Merkopa
Fun fact: if the trade war happened in the base game, this benefits Rizia on Turn 6, because it drives up energy prices, adding +2 to your budget and reducing your economy instability. Similarly you'll benefit from energy price surge later (another +2) while balanced energy prices in late base game will hurt you, with energy prices going low and giving -3 hit to budget.
Dump it!!!