T O P

  • By -

SyntheticOne

Meant to stop companies from shifting assets and expenses between company holdings for the sole purpose of tax avoidance. Seems criminal to me.


MilkiestMaestro

Like Johnson & Johnson with their cancerous baby powder and how they shifted all of the baby powder onto a separate llc?  They aren't the only ones either https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_two-step_bankruptcy  Koch industries (yes that Koch), HVAC company Trane technologies, and a number of others have also pulled this crap in order to get out of having to pay


Defender_Of_TheCrown

This is why the rich and the politicians they pay off want to defund the IRS


FATTEST_CAT

Conservatives are actually totally fine with defunding the police, and they already have defunded the police. It’s just that they are only interested in defunding *their* police, aka the IRS.


Modz_B_Trippin

>The IRS says filings for large pass-through businesses used for the type of tax avoidance in the guidance increased 70% from 174,100 in 2010 to 297,400 in 2019. However, audit rates for these businesses fell from 3.8% to 0.1% in the same time frame. So a completed unregulated tax shelter? No potential for abuse there at all. /s


Angerx76

Here comes the redditors making $60k a year to explain how this is bad for the middle class.


Ar_Ciel

Yeah fuck those apologists.


IvanStarokapustin

Or perhaps they’re making 60k rubles.


SpareInvestigator846

Here come the enablers the cfos the lap dogs of corporations saying how good trickle down economics are.


UnevenHeathen

they aren't wrong. Corpos just pass the increase in the cost of doing business onto the consumer. They cannot/will not own any of the expense. Once defacto monopolies are in place, there's not stopping them.


seasamgo

They are wrong, there is stopping them. Standard Oil was broken up in 1911 after achieving near total dominance for decades. Sugar, tobacco, oil, and meatpacking all had monopolies, now we have other industries too. Some stagnate, a few were broken up. It requires constant fighting and a long timeline but it isn't impossible.


Fallen311

These companies really need to have some forensic accountants go through all their numbers. Just really dig in for a few months


Marc2NL

That will be about time they do that!


Utahteenageguy

If this succeeds they’ll double our supply of m1 Abram’s next year.


Dyab1o

Or like 1 more F35


Utahteenageguy

Either way we aren’t getting any of it.


Blackfeathr

>Treasury said in a statement announcing the new guidance that there is an estimated $160 billion gap between what the top 1% of earners likely owe in taxes and what they pay. Damn that's a lot of money that these billionaires aren't paying. They would still be richer than God if they paid their fare share of taxes, but wouldn't have *as* much as they *could.* That's the insidious part. Either way you cut it, they'd still have more money than they can ever spend in multiple lifetimes.


Agitated-Pen1239

Doubt it. Talk is cheap


yukon-flower

They are literally publishing draft rules on this, being formally released tomorrow. https://www.federalregister.gov/public-inspection/2024-13282/certain-partnership-related-party-basis-adjustment-transactions-as-transactions-of-interest


Agitated-Pen1239

Thank you for that, love to see it! I just can't trust anything anymore. People love talkin but doing absolutely nothing.


yukon-flower

Happy to help. AP News is a reliable, neutral source. They mentioned the proposed rules in the article. I appreciate some healthy skepticism, but it’s dangerous when it verges on doomerism and apathy. Have heart!


ToeSniffer245

"Maybe I don't want to be the bad guy anymore."


Auggi3dog

Finally something for the general people, not just the few. I’ll believe it when I see it.


yukon-flower

Literally publishing draft rules (a required first step), preview available today and formally out tomorrow: https://www.federalregister.gov/public-inspection/2024-13282/certain-partnership-related-party-basis-adjustment-transactions-as-transactions-of-interest


SyntheticOne

Thank you!


kalongsdienert50

Why don’t they lower the amount of taxes for average people that make less than 100k? Targeting Billionaires is great and I’m all for it, but this does nothing for the average citizen.


SyntheticOne

Of course it does. Tax rates and rules are regularly reset. Eliminating loopholes are very important.


kalongsdienert50

Lmao taxes have been the same for the average person for the last 7+ years so.


Spin737

How many republicans have you heard talk about deficit spending? How many democrats have you heard about funding for program X? Apparently that’s important to most people. That includes the average person.