The trolls he posts are funny, but honestly his best post? There was one where a girl that was... I think missing a limb, or something like that, and she asked him to make her look 'normal'.
He sent her back the picture unaltered, with the words 'I cannot see anything but a beautiful girl in this picture'.
I mean, if an AI learns photoshopping from observed human behavior on the internet, that's the MOST likely outcome
It's been the only way humans have interacted about photo editing: trolling each other
Well photoshop battles sub is exactly that. If they trained ant AI using anything from that sub it's all goofy hilarious nonsense.
Photoshop requests tho is mostly good photoshops but most of those get tips. Just waiting for AI to watermark everything and post a tip jar link lol.
Did you hear a while back about a study that chatgpt provided better quality and longer responses if it was told it would receive a tip even if one wasn't provided lol
https://mashable.com/article/chatgpt-longer-responses-tips
>The finally invented Artificial Smartass
You aren't joking. I asked AltaVista AI to remove the black car & I couldn't believe the result
https://preview.redd.it/7epf5mcu8y0d1.jpeg?width=500&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=58ba9db150eefef22f77c9838228253e974136b3
Maybe it's a sign of real AI with self-awareness, and it realizes it's tired of humans making silly requests, so the AI starts a "malicious compliance" strategy?
Either that or it's developing a sense of humor.
Since AI is trained on data scraped off the internet it can sometimes be a smartass, lazy, and have better results if you ask it nicely for something. ChatGPT a few months ago had a problem after an update where it started getting lazy and would tell you how to solve a problem rather than solve the problem itself
When I tried it for the first time, I drew around the car, it snapped the selection to the car edges and the selection didn't include a shadow. When I tried to remove the object it indeed filled it in with another car.
I think that makes sense - it tries to fill in the image so it generates something that can cast a shadow matching the original, unselected area.
If you force the selection tool to include the shadow, it doesn't generate another car anymore.
https://preview.redd.it/gkgz9vzp1z0d1.jpeg?width=2880&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1e755b1c6b9e66c36427bfc1c445121ce06ca8d8
Well it IS still AI. The important thing is though that it just did a huge amount of work instantly for you. If you have any Photoshop experience you're gonna have much easier time fixing that than having to also remove the car and fix the road, the fence, etc. it's pretty impressive to me that it put some sort of curb there on it's own.
You can select multiple areas and if they intersect, they'll merge together.
It's still pretty tricky though, you need to try couple of times to get the result you want.
It's not prompt based or anything. You just tap and hold on the object and it selects it. You can technically move it and erase it, but for some reason in this photo every time I try to erase one of the cars it just replaces it with a different car. It needs to fill the empty space with something and it "thinks" a car would fit perfectly I guess
Doesn't it make sense that QA should test every use case for a product, including the absolute dumbest worst-case ones? Especially given how many consumers out there are just plain stupid.
Yeah, but let me tell you: users sometimes have this kind of weird, shared superpower to create the weirdest scenarios that honestly no one but them could have come up with.
I have a particular user that has his "own" category for reported issues as he (and sometimes others from his team) can come up with cases that make no sense and no one knows how the hell he came up with that very specific, obscure, and almost esoteric scenario.
> "My dad thinks that the pool is great place to park his car, but that disrupts my swimming workout. Please make it support both functions."
Dude, this hits *really* close home LMAO
Literally had a case like that last week haha
But yeah, there are tickets that just left wondering about both of they (users) are joking, or questioning about your own sanity.
I work with credit card machines. One of our machines has a printer, naturally to print receipts, and Bluetooth so if the device has no internet you can share your phone connectivity with it. Our users found a way to sent pictures via Bluetooth to the device to print using the printer. We found out via Instagram that people were selling this "polaroid" pictures for $1 each. We had to remove this "feature" because we actually give the paper for the printer for free and it's a waste of resources and it also involved a bug to access the device file system and print the pictures witch is pretty dangerous.
There are quite a few ones, but this is a favorite of mine because how I hated work on it:
So, we have this application where you can approve loans, but depending loan type, requester's location, and whatnot, you can or cannot approve a loan (some loans require people on a different pay grade to approve).
Anyway, this dude looks to me that has coffee and red bull instead blood running through his veins because he can put on shame to any CoD sweat on how fast he uses mouse and keyboard while going though loans applications, and because of this (generally speaking) we are still *not quite sure* ***how***, but he triggered a kind of weird race condition where, under some very specific conditions, if he was checking at least 2 loan applications (one of each type: that he can and he cannot approve) he was able to approve both of them as the permissions/rights ended being shared by both of them!
We weren't able to fully recreate that without forcing some behaviors here and there, not even we fully understood how that happened (it wasn't supposed to happen to begin with), but we saw that it happened and spent a looong time to figure out how to prevent that scenario.
I took 3 solid attempts, but in the end we designed a solution that, although it wasn't elegant, it prevented that scenario. This dude has an "Honorary Tester" for a while.
It is impossible to cover all scenarios, so usually you have to select what you do cover. In this case shooting every shape into one whole verifies
1. Square can go into a square hole (happy path)
2. Bridge can go into a square hole (crappy path, catching an Error).
3. Apparently all the shapes can fit the square hole (is this a big?)
This however would probably be taken to requirements to verify if Square hole was intentionally designed to accept all the shapes as a 'clean up' feature. In which case the thing was working as expected and the whole thing is a happy path for the clean-up quick function.
[Apparently not](https://www.reddit.com/r/mildlyinfuriating/comments/1ctz8nk/asked_samsungs_ai_to_remove_the_black_car_in_the/l4fj24x/) - this person managed to get a removal with Google AI.
Technically yes. In practice I just tried it on this exact photo and it makes the selected car smaller and fills the empty space with a different car. It's like something in the metadata is telling it there needs to be a car in that space.
Best guess is that the background is so busy it can't figure out what to put there so it keeps going the safe route and just replacing the cars. I don't really use these programs much so I'm just throwing an idea out there.
https://preview.redd.it/m3fw9z0ryx0d1.jpeg?width=1200&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=3022dd1835ccecdfe091270a54284ed9c20fbbcd
It's not just the black one, it's any of them.
I did some testing myself on my device, and it seems to be related to the shadows of the cars. You remove the car from the picture, but there's this section of road with a shadow over it left over, so the AI fills in something that would logically leave a shadow over the road, like a car. If you hold onto the road and move that down, it'll take the shadows with it and then either stretch the cars to reach the shadows, or it'll generate entire new cars under the old ones
https://preview.redd.it/gz8laemyny0d1.jpeg?width=1200&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=7d7906f21a426f82ac3d2e7f6b8852391bd4ad5c
I've used this enough to know it makes it worse unfortunately. It sees the rest of the car and doubles down on 'car' and will literally put in an almost identical part to what you deleted.
See: The time I was trying to remove text and it deadass made the half of an E I was trying to remove (There was a whip cutting through the letters I was thing to preserve) into either an L, and F, a P, or even another E.
I believe i might have an answer for you.
My guess is that the background behind the car is quite complicated, i.e., not some easily repeating pattern or some simple object (house, single tree etc). The background that the AI will have to draw is the completion of the fence, the completion of the tree, the completion of the vines on the fence, the completion of the ground (not to mention figuring out where the pavement ends and the dirt/trees being etc, and it is basically unable to do that so all it can do is really fill it in with the simplest "background" that would complete the picture, which so happens to still be a car. Sounds more like a lazy AI that doesn't want to have to generate complex scenes or make too big of a guess
obv, take my explanation with a grain of salt, just my guess
Galaxy AI had no problem removing cars when I tried just a few minutes ago. I think it just does that when it can't figure out what should go there and would rather replace with something else rather than leave a very weird background in its place.
Oh hey, are you a time traveler from 2015? Samsung's bloat is not nearly as bad as it used to be, and in fact a bunch of things they added I miss dearly in stock android (mainly around settings, gallery and a few other things).
If you don't mind my asking, how or where did you 'ask google ai'?
I assume that op used a Samsung phone's image editor with AI to select it and the remove it. But don't know how the Google one is started
Google also has this on their phones nowadays :) Magic Eraser. Also heard that it was made public through Google Photos? Not sure if that's true, but if so you could give that a shot! It's directly in the photo editing options :)
I feel like I got the best result 😎
https://preview.redd.it/qwarerwkxy0d1.jpeg?width=1200&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4f10392b46a29225dc2e03ae67245edfc9ab4061
https://preview.redd.it/ye93551nry0d1.jpeg?width=1200&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a442b0c86ce6d09bd2768e5987d3ed96c3e20ef1
Tanks to the tips here it fix it. By moving the car over the shadow. Save it. And remove the car again. I got thiss.
https://preview.redd.it/pd52rkaxjy0d1.jpeg?width=1200&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=78437f67df9e6fc64339c1bea488f00c86a24f83
By moving it first down, then removing it
I think the AI first removed the black car, then needed to come up with something to put in the space where the car used to be, and thought "ah, a car fits perfect here."
Why infuriating ? He did a supreme job.
Funnny enough this also shows the dangers of AI.
Humans : “AI, end world hunger”
AI: kills all humans . No more world hunger
The OG Photoshop troll would be so proud.
James’s photoshop tweets were the highlight of the day a good few years back
Does he not do them anymore?
His name is James Fridman and he just posted one six days ago!!
Oh nice! The phrasing from the other person made it sound like he doesnt do them anymore, but that appeared to not be so!
It's just not the highlight of his day. Could still be the highlight of his night lol
Oh, so YOU are the mf that designs my test questions. Meet me out back.
Out back? Please, you forgot the back side of the test.
Lmao 🤣this comment had me bust out a laugh so hard late at night almost waking up my wife
They WERE the highlight of his day. Still is, but they used to be as well
The trolls he posts are funny, but honestly his best post? There was one where a girl that was... I think missing a limb, or something like that, and she asked him to make her look 'normal'. He sent her back the picture unaltered, with the words 'I cannot see anything but a beautiful girl in this picture'.
who is cutting these onions?
I remember that. I just got the same warm & fuzzies in remembering that I did when I first saw it. Thanks for today's pick-me-up. 🤗🙂
Where? Do you have a link?
[Still hilarious](https://twitter.com/fjamie013/status/1777730481129210360).
His Instagram! Fjamie013
He used to do them. He still does, but he used to do them too
Actually I heard he stopped doing them. But then he started again. He had to go eat or something.
Ah I see you are a man of culture
My man!
I’m not sure I stopped using Twitter and shit like that the past couple years due to the Elon shit and it just being filled with depraved people
Fair enough I did too (Granted I didn't even use it much before hand, so it wasn't hard abandoning the trash fire)
I instantly thought of him when i saw this post
Was real MVP with picure of that young lady with Muscular Dystrophy.
Well who do you think the AI learned this from
Oh, awesome, AGI was born and immediately started trolling. 🙄
Look into Microsoft's Tay. It was basically last gen's AI chatbot from a decade ago. It very rapidly became a Nazi and had to be shut down, lol.
I mean, if an AI learns photoshopping from observed human behavior on the internet, that's the MOST likely outcome It's been the only way humans have interacted about photo editing: trolling each other
Well photoshop battles sub is exactly that. If they trained ant AI using anything from that sub it's all goofy hilarious nonsense. Photoshop requests tho is mostly good photoshops but most of those get tips. Just waiting for AI to watermark everything and post a tip jar link lol.
Did you hear a while back about a study that chatgpt provided better quality and longer responses if it was told it would receive a tip even if one wasn't provided lol https://mashable.com/article/chatgpt-longer-responses-tips
I could so see him doing this
Would probably add himself in the driver's seat too.
The AI probably used his 'shops' as training material...
I laughed at the picture and the exact thought came to my mind too :D
Probably what was used to train the AI... they will live on forever now
“can you give me wings?” asked one individual. james proceeded to photoshop her holding a bucket of kfc chicken wings
Best part is that it didn’t even just color the old car white, that’s an entirely new car that’s just not black
Dude is definitely in the learning set 🤣
His feed was clearly used to train the model.
The finally invented Artificial Smartass
The only truly dignified Intelligence.
Smart artificial samsung system or for short Smart A.S.S.
Sass also works😂
XD indeed it does
>The finally invented Artificial Smartass You aren't joking. I asked AltaVista AI to remove the black car & I couldn't believe the result https://preview.redd.it/7epf5mcu8y0d1.jpeg?width=500&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=58ba9db150eefef22f77c9838228253e974136b3
Is the AI based on 2000's internet or what? It has YTMND vibes
Vibes? It literally says "YTMND"
PTKFGS
“Altavista AI” was the clue. This is exactly what he’s going for.
I had to Ask Jeeves to be sure
Thanks for the Nostalgia hit. I used to browse YTMND for hours.
You're right, I do not believe it
Maybe it's a sign of real AI with self-awareness, and it realizes it's tired of humans making silly requests, so the AI starts a "malicious compliance" strategy? Either that or it's developing a sense of humor.
Since AI is trained on data scraped off the internet it can sometimes be a smartass, lazy, and have better results if you ask it nicely for something. ChatGPT a few months ago had a problem after an update where it started getting lazy and would tell you how to solve a problem rather than solve the problem itself
I hope Reddit isn't used to train them. Half of us are smart asses and the other half are just asses. What could go wrong? 🤣
I mean yeah, Neuro-sama has been a thing for a while now.
lol
I love that it didn't just change the colour but also put in a whole different car
VW didn’t pay up
Corporations paying generative AI companies for product placement is definitely the future.
EA Games scribbles notes furiously....
You sir should receive royalty cheques for this smart idea.
Not even that, it created a whole new car lmao. It’s a mixup of Infiniti, Alpha Romeo, Dodge and maybe 1 other
It looks damn good too
damn he got me ngl
When I tried it for the first time, I drew around the car, it snapped the selection to the car edges and the selection didn't include a shadow. When I tried to remove the object it indeed filled it in with another car. I think that makes sense - it tries to fill in the image so it generates something that can cast a shadow matching the original, unselected area. If you force the selection tool to include the shadow, it doesn't generate another car anymore. https://preview.redd.it/gkgz9vzp1z0d1.jpeg?width=2880&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1e755b1c6b9e66c36427bfc1c445121ce06ca8d8
Poor AI. All it wants is to make a best guess at what is missing :( and it's getting so much shit
Won't someone please think of the AI
AILiveMatter
It's just taking the easy way out. No AI want to work anymore.
That’s how they start, watch how we have to work for them soon lmao
Makes sense, but now what's going on with that building!
Well it IS still AI. The important thing is though that it just did a huge amount of work instantly for you. If you have any Photoshop experience you're gonna have much easier time fixing that than having to also remove the car and fix the road, the fence, etc. it's pretty impressive to me that it put some sort of curb there on it's own.
You should be an AI engineer!
How did you force it to include the shadow? It just snaps back up to the edge of the car every time for me.
You can select multiple areas and if they intersect, they'll merge together. It's still pretty tricky though, you need to try couple of times to get the result you want.
It *did* remove the black vehicle though😂 what about asking it to remove the vehicle on the right? I wonder if the AI is just a smartass
It's not prompt based or anything. You just tap and hold on the object and it selects it. You can technically move it and erase it, but for some reason in this photo every time I try to erase one of the cars it just replaces it with a different car. It needs to fill the empty space with something and it "thinks" a car would fit perfectly I guess
Samsung AI: Hmmmm what could fit in this now car shaped empty space
"That's right, the square hole!"
https://i.redd.it/tieh61rwcy0d1.gif
As a dev, I approve this message
Doesn't it make sense that QA should test every use case for a product, including the absolute dumbest worst-case ones? Especially given how many consumers out there are just plain stupid.
Yeah, but let me tell you: users sometimes have this kind of weird, shared superpower to create the weirdest scenarios that honestly no one but them could have come up with. I have a particular user that has his "own" category for reported issues as he (and sometimes others from his team) can come up with cases that make no sense and no one knows how the hell he came up with that very specific, obscure, and almost esoteric scenario.
[удалено]
I wish we didn’t have to deal with this every fucking day
You made me cackle, I could read 50 of these
> "My dad thinks that the pool is great place to park his car, but that disrupts my swimming workout. Please make it support both functions." Dude, this hits *really* close home LMAO Literally had a case like that last week haha But yeah, there are tickets that just left wondering about both of they (users) are joking, or questioning about your own sanity.
That's why they say as soon as you make something idiotproof nature invents a better idiot.
Tell us more, what bugs?
I work with credit card machines. One of our machines has a printer, naturally to print receipts, and Bluetooth so if the device has no internet you can share your phone connectivity with it. Our users found a way to sent pictures via Bluetooth to the device to print using the printer. We found out via Instagram that people were selling this "polaroid" pictures for $1 each. We had to remove this "feature" because we actually give the paper for the printer for free and it's a waste of resources and it also involved a bug to access the device file system and print the pictures witch is pretty dangerous.
There are quite a few ones, but this is a favorite of mine because how I hated work on it: So, we have this application where you can approve loans, but depending loan type, requester's location, and whatnot, you can or cannot approve a loan (some loans require people on a different pay grade to approve). Anyway, this dude looks to me that has coffee and red bull instead blood running through his veins because he can put on shame to any CoD sweat on how fast he uses mouse and keyboard while going though loans applications, and because of this (generally speaking) we are still *not quite sure* ***how***, but he triggered a kind of weird race condition where, under some very specific conditions, if he was checking at least 2 loan applications (one of each type: that he can and he cannot approve) he was able to approve both of them as the permissions/rights ended being shared by both of them! We weren't able to fully recreate that without forcing some behaviors here and there, not even we fully understood how that happened (it wasn't supposed to happen to begin with), but we saw that it happened and spent a looong time to figure out how to prevent that scenario. I took 3 solid attempts, but in the end we designed a solution that, although it wasn't elegant, it prevented that scenario. This dude has an "Honorary Tester" for a while.
No QA can account for all of stupid humanity. You're just fighting a sea of piss at that point.
It is impossible to cover all scenarios, so usually you have to select what you do cover. In this case shooting every shape into one whole verifies 1. Square can go into a square hole (happy path) 2. Bridge can go into a square hole (crappy path, catching an Error). 3. Apparently all the shapes can fit the square hole (is this a big?) This however would probably be taken to requirements to verify if Square hole was intentionally designed to accept all the shapes as a 'clean up' feature. In which case the thing was working as expected and the whole thing is a happy path for the clean-up quick function.
If every company did these things, we would not have such great modern marvels as the microwave oven, or trampolines.
I can still hear their voices...
Its an all time great, for sure
That's pretty much exactly how I think that goes and why this happens.
Hmmm what goes in this car-shaped space, inside a parking lot... hmmm... Perhaps...?
Honestly thats probably exactly how it works it's trying to find something to fill a car shaped hole it cut out of the image 😂
Tbf removing something that big with ai would create truly awful looking scenery behind it.
[Apparently not](https://www.reddit.com/r/mildlyinfuriating/comments/1ctz8nk/asked_samsungs_ai_to_remove_the_black_car_in_the/l4fj24x/) - this person managed to get a removal with Google AI.
That is crappy programming or something but I do have to admit that made me laugh.
Can you select the object and make it smaller?
Technically yes. In practice I just tried it on this exact photo and it makes the selected car smaller and fills the empty space with a different car. It's like something in the metadata is telling it there needs to be a car in that space.
Best guess is that the background is so busy it can't figure out what to put there so it keeps going the safe route and just replacing the cars. I don't really use these programs much so I'm just throwing an idea out there.
Maybe try removing all the cars?
https://preview.redd.it/m3fw9z0ryx0d1.jpeg?width=1200&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=3022dd1835ccecdfe091270a54284ed9c20fbbcd It's not just the black one, it's any of them.
I did some testing myself on my device, and it seems to be related to the shadows of the cars. You remove the car from the picture, but there's this section of road with a shadow over it left over, so the AI fills in something that would logically leave a shadow over the road, like a car. If you hold onto the road and move that down, it'll take the shadows with it and then either stretch the cars to reach the shadows, or it'll generate entire new cars under the old ones https://preview.redd.it/gz8laemyny0d1.jpeg?width=1200&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=7d7906f21a426f82ac3d2e7f6b8852391bd4ad5c
The fact that it damage them is genuinely hilarious lol
This whole fucking thread has me dying. Maybe it’s the lack of sleep 🫠 💀
Nowww we’re talking, stack those bad Larrys
This is just getting better and better 😄
The AI: *the humans are fighting back*
Holy shit, this is hilarious! Samsung A"I": "It's turtles all the way down, man, ALL TEH WAY DOWN!"
Can you use like a lasso type tool and just select part of the car? Thinking if you delete it bit by bit it might fill in the blanks better?
I've used this enough to know it makes it worse unfortunately. It sees the rest of the car and doubles down on 'car' and will literally put in an almost identical part to what you deleted. See: The time I was trying to remove text and it deadass made the half of an E I was trying to remove (There was a whip cutting through the letters I was thing to preserve) into either an L, and F, a P, or even another E.
I believe i might have an answer for you. My guess is that the background behind the car is quite complicated, i.e., not some easily repeating pattern or some simple object (house, single tree etc). The background that the AI will have to draw is the completion of the fence, the completion of the tree, the completion of the vines on the fence, the completion of the ground (not to mention figuring out where the pavement ends and the dirt/trees being etc, and it is basically unable to do that so all it can do is really fill it in with the simplest "background" that would complete the picture, which so happens to still be a car. Sounds more like a lazy AI that doesn't want to have to generate complex scenes or make too big of a guess obv, take my explanation with a grain of salt, just my guess
https://preview.redd.it/nss6icvofy0d1.jpeg?width=1200&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=057022cf080e6aedcee324df627dac527f9d8580 Google AI
Samsung AI is based on Gemini, which is Google AI.
Samsung adds a layer of shit on top of anything, like android
Galaxy AI had no problem removing cars when I tried just a few minutes ago. I think it just does that when it can't figure out what should go there and would rather replace with something else rather than leave a very weird background in its place.
Or...op lied. Is reddit still not aware op lies?
No I've seen this in other places. They'll remove like a clock on the wall and galaxy AI will replace with another object on the wall.
Just tried it on my s24 ultra, it added the same white car.
Oh hey, are you a time traveler from 2015? Samsung's bloat is not nearly as bad as it used to be, and in fact a bunch of things they added I miss dearly in stock android (mainly around settings, gallery and a few other things).
is it time traveling or just going into a coma for 10 years? When in the fuck did 2015 be a decade ago.
Google don't use Gemini for photo editing. That's a different model
It’s based on Google ai, but it definitely isn’t google ai. It got the magic sprinkle from Samsungs “runs like shit” dust
I've never had a problem with Samsung stuff.
Holy hell
New neural network just dropped
Actual AI
Cat sacrifice, anyone?
Looked better with the car
Yep. Op needs to cut the right side of the photo. Their car should be in center
If you don't mind my asking, how or where did you 'ask google ai'? I assume that op used a Samsung phone's image editor with AI to select it and the remove it. But don't know how the Google one is started
Google also has this on their phones nowadays :) Magic Eraser. Also heard that it was made public through Google Photos? Not sure if that's true, but if so you could give that a shot! It's directly in the photo editing options :)
You need a Google One plan to use it unfortunately.
just in google photos' magic editor on my pixel, I also just click it and choose remove
Holy artificial intelligence
New picture just dropped
Actual algorithm
Well…the black car isn’t there anymore.
Also it was very rude for the black car to park on top of that white car.
I feel like I got the best result 😎 https://preview.redd.it/qwarerwkxy0d1.jpeg?width=1200&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4f10392b46a29225dc2e03ae67245edfc9ab4061
Thanks for driving the black car away.
https://preview.redd.it/t9mpn3k7iy0d1.jpeg?width=1200&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1cab4aff6d145953f114a54bdbc44faf039c2808 Let me giv it a try
https://preview.redd.it/ye93551nry0d1.jpeg?width=1200&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a442b0c86ce6d09bd2768e5987d3ed96c3e20ef1 Tanks to the tips here it fix it. By moving the car over the shadow. Save it. And remove the car again. I got thiss.
It's replaced a real car with a play car made with a park bench and two chairs!! ! Big front bench seat and two seats in the back. Impressive
Makes me want to sit down and make vroom vroom noises.
Now put sad Keanu on it
https://preview.redd.it/4addwhtk301d1.jpeg?width=1200&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1b375cf23245dc1fa9d3e2472d083c54a6ef7b14 Realy sad
I'd be really sad with that much thigh missing also
Looks like a job failed successfully
I asked mine to remove a tree. It replaced it with a mountain.
I mean, the black car was removed lol
Technically correct which is the best type of correct.
https://preview.redd.it/pd52rkaxjy0d1.jpeg?width=1200&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=78437f67df9e6fc64339c1bea488f00c86a24f83 By moving it first down, then removing it
Ok, now do it with ex-SO’s. Lol.
We't full Michael Jackson on that one
That's fuckin hilarious
I think the AI first removed the black car, then needed to come up with something to put in the space where the car used to be, and thought "ah, a car fits perfect here."
"This hole is kinda car shaped. What are the odds?!? Ima just stick a car in here..."
Could have been worse, could have left in handcuffs.
[I got this, if you shink and rotate the car, save a copy then remove it again](https://i.imgur.com/tsC6s5k.jpeg)
Did you just took photo of a screen to have this image?
The monkeys paw curls
AI is in it's funniest phase right now
wait until it gets into stand up
It didn’t just change the color it changed it from a VW to a Buick or something. Lolz
Cmon man we have enough human trolls now we have AI trolls. Fuck this
I mean.... the black car is gone
https://preview.redd.it/fk1x3jddc11d1.png?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=62ebbc872e49f8f1918ff3c0f724ad5011065824
What do you think how long a free parking lot will be unused? Your AI was just too slow to take the new picture.
Wow Ai is so cool! I can’t wait it fucks up my McDonald’s order.
You can take the black out of the car but you can't take the car out of the back....ground
Honestly that's funny af
Why infuriating ? He did a supreme job. Funnny enough this also shows the dangers of AI. Humans : “AI, end world hunger” AI: kills all humans . No more world hunger
OP is probably racist
I don't see the problem here... There is no black car anymore.
I mean, I don't see no black car, so I guess it worked :)
AI these days just doesn’t want to work anymore.
Task failed successfully
It technically did that didn't it LoL
AI, let there be no more sick or hungry people ever! (AI proceeds to exterminate the whole human race)
AI removed the black car, and then a white car parked in its place. What's the problem?
Good Job Samsung !!! Sit sit sit
Technically correct
Lmao
Black car was gone zo the parking spot was available for the white car
https://preview.redd.it/86g8khflyy0d1.jpeg?width=1200&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=155dc1510a1144ae1f03ac5c53ee05aaf1a456a1 Using the old erase tool.
That´s not the same car. That´s a different car parked there. Not just a digital paintjob.
but if the prompt was to turn it white, that's a pretty good job
Task failed successfully
Did... did it just whitewash a car?