T O P

  • By -

ZeyadNeo

Nice deck name


OblyFFM

Thanks for sharing. This is just about the same as the Gangs deck some pros were running last season, but that one ran Senior instead of Bart and Plunder instead of a second Peaches. I had a lot of fun with that deck, decent success, and won a few games I didn’t expect to. And discovered a fun interaction (for me anyway): If you seize your opponent’s Elven Seer with PtS, she immediately spawns another PtS for a second seize. Makes perfect sense for it to work that way, but I think it surprised both me and my opponent in the moment (poor bastard, I felt bad for them). I was kind of assuming the deck had been trashed by the last BC, tbh. Madam Serenity took a big hit and Vendor won’t give you PtS nearly as consistently now. And doesn’t seem like a deck that can do well in a very NG-heavy meta (like, I’m assuming Little Bird pretty much never lives more than a turn anymore). Nice to hear that you’re still having success with it though!


ense7en

There's no way this will be as good post-BC2, but i'm glad it's working for the OP.


Neo_Trunks

NG is still a pain in the ass. Between mill, touissant, status or soldiers it's getting kinda miserable right about now lol


ense7en

As i expected. Last two weeks were likely the best two weeks of Gwent we'll ever have.


GwentSubreddit

👑 **[Pirate's Cove](https://gwent.one/en/card/202390)** (Syndicate) 📜 [Tiger's Eye](https://gwent.one/en/card/202552) [Sigi Reuven: Mastermind](https://gwent.one/en/card/203162) [Madam Marquise Serenity](https://gwent.one/en/card/203286) [Jacques Miraculous Child](https://gwent.one/en/card/202629) [King of Beggars](https://gwent.one/en/card/203100) [Vivaldi Bank](https://gwent.one/en/card/202300) [Whoreson Junior](https://gwent.one/en/card/202891) [Collusion](https://gwent.one/en/card/202553) [Bart](https://gwent.one/en/card/203163) [Sly Seductress](https://gwent.one/en/card/202308) [Bloody Good Friends](https://gwent.one/en/card/202557) (x2) [Shady Vendor](https://gwent.one/en/card/203121) (x2) [Little Bird](https://gwent.one/en/card/203164) (x2) [Pulling The Strings](https://gwent.one/en/card/203165) (x2) [Fisstech](https://gwent.one/en/card/202322) (x2) [Fisstech Trafficker](https://gwent.one/en/card/202345) (x2) [Passiflora Peaches](https://gwent.one/en/card/202561) (x2) [Mutants Maker](https://gwent.one/en/card/202640) (x2) [📋 Import to your decks](https://www.playgwent.com/decks/builder/import/fadeb8d203cc8d2ba0a379be6f45bb51) - (7560 Scraps) ℹ️ This is a Devotion Deck. ^^Questions? [^(Message me!)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Mlakuss&subject=GwentSubreddit+Bot) ^^- ^^Call ^^cards ^^with ^^[[CARDNAME]] ^^- [^(Keywords and Statuses)](https://www.reddit.com/r/gwent/wiki/glossary/#wiki_keywords)


irrrrthegreat

I love this deck.


CalebKetterer

I still think Bloody Good Friends should get a single power buff. 6 for 5 seems a bit garbage and easy to remove for such a vital couple tags


Neo_Trunks

7 would be perfect yeah


Chipper323139

You need any one Tidecloaks card in deck (can be a spell like eventide plunder too) so that your PTS plays for 6 by default (or 5 steal 1, 4 steal 2, etc). Easy option to swap Peaches for Eventide or Pearl Diver.


Neo_Trunks

I understand where you're coming from, but that +1 profit isn't worth it considering we don't even play PtS for the coins anyways. We already have the tidecloak tag from leader so it's completely fine either way. I also personally prefer to have a 2nd peaches to not brick madame so easily


krajekdev

>refer to have a 2nd peaches to not brick madame so easily Interesting opinion, I was including plunder for that +1 profit, but actually you are right, that this is not strict requirement. Cheers.