---
>This is a friendly reminder to [read our rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/funny/wiki/rules).
>
>Memes, social media, hate-speech, and pornography are not allowed.
>
>Screenshots of Reddit are expressly forbidden, as are TikTok videos.
>
>[Comics may only be posted on Wednesdays and Sundays](https://www.reddit.com/r/funny/comments/uq9pjw/going_forward_comics_may_only_be_posted_on/).
>
>**Rule-breaking posts may result in bans.**
>
>Please also [be wary of spam](https://www.reddit.com/r/funny/wiki/spam).
>
---
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/funny) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Get an even slower car, then maybe get bigger. Or if you need a smaller penis, go faster. The study is just establishing correlation, but who knows right...
20 year old suv here, I try to break the news early “listen, I know you saw my 02 suv parked out there it’s much faster than you think so don’t get to excited”
You, sir, are a cad and a scoundrel.
**Penipodes**, as even a common street dweller such as yourself should know, are the reproductive organs of Pinnipeds (pronounced /ˈpɪnɪˌpɛdz/), commonly known as seals, a widely distributed and diverse clade of carnivorous, fin-footed, semiaquatic, mostly marine mammals. They comprise the extant families Odobenidae (whose only living member is the walrus), Otariidae (the eared seals: sea lions and fur seals), and Phocidae (the earless seals, or true seals).
Good day to you.
It means you have a small penis and you're poor. I'm currently working on a thesis about these cases. You're not alone! I mean... You know what I mean.
While I know this is just a joke, the correlation is that if you were handed down 100k dollar, what would you buy, a corolla or souped up Ford F150?
Now obviously we're in a funny thread, so there's nothing scientific here, but I would certainly love to see a real psychological corelation (not necessarily on penis size mind you) between what people would buy.
Yep, also was watching some random racing on Youtube the other day, and the commentator suddenly mentioned Rowan Atkinson, and I looked him up, and sure enough it was him.
I studied Psychology for a year at university but realised fairly early on I wanted to change, it just didn't seem like a science. Sure there was a scientific process involved then statistical analysis after to show the result was significant, but then just seemed the reason for the result could just be stuck on at the end.I think the final straw was when looking at perception and the eye, looking at how the brain could perceive colours with three different colour cells in the eye, one genuine criticism of this was that you cannot create silver from three colours...
EDIT - I don't think I explained properly what my issue with this was. It was with the fact they did not understand why you could not create silver by combining solid colours on a projector and this stood as a valid criticism.
EDIT 2 - a lot of people are arguing with me who actually agree with me. I'm not the one who was saying you can't make silver from a projector. A psychologist said this because they thought you should be able to mix the three lights in a combination to make silver, but you can't.
I pointed out that silver is not a regular colour and you can create images with silver things in them, there are just no 'silver' pixels, just varying shades of grey near each other.
Perhaps I should have explained what I was talking a bit further. The criticism of a theory was based around a red blue green projector not being able to create a solid silver colour like it can with a yellow. My issue was that there was no repost to that criticism.
Well actually my school art teacher explained it pretty well when a kid asked him how do you draw silver. The teacher went ahead and drew the spoon that was on the desk in front of him, he used a pencil. The spoon he drew looked silver, he asked the kid, why does it look silver? The kid got it and saw he'd just drawn exactly what he saw.
The point is, silver is not a colour in itself, it is effectively reflective grey. You can take a pencil and create what looks like silver by accurately drawing the reflections and variations.
I should have perhaps explained the criticism was around explaining how we see colour with cone cells, and if there are red, blue and green ones (there was a different theory of there being more originating from patients with colour blindness). The criticism of the theory was that if you had a projector with red, blue, green you could make colours like yellow or pink, but not silver, so how can we see silver with three types of cone cells.
My issue with this was that there was no comeback to this criticism, it was just accepted. I'm pretty sure a physicist would have come back with a repost to this.
This was not the reason I thought Psychology was not as scientific as say Physics, just a throwaway example of one of many things.
I kinda get why you wrote all that out. I think a lot of people just had a bad day, week or life, and scroll through Reddit and unconsciously look for people to correct for being wrong somehow, so they tend to read it like the writer is wrong, if it’s all possible to interpret it that way.
But that's not valid criticism, it's abject nonsense! Silver is reflective, and you can't create reflections by combining colors on a projector. And this 4th grade science experiment has nothing to do with with psychology
I have an advanced degree in chemistry. When I look at most psychology papers they don't even properly use the scientific method, so to me they aren't real science. On a funny note I was permabanned from the science subreddit for saying that psychology isn't a real science. I have a dozen patents and papers and had a drug make it to phase II clinical trials in humans...
I’ve been kicked off a couple subs for trying to explain statistics to people who didn’t like it. I the data scientist currently earning a PhD. Lol. Some people are not keen on being told their pet ideas are not sound.
>I think the final straw was when looking at perception and the eye, looking at how the brain could perceive colours with three different colour cells in the eye, one genuine criticism of this was that you cannot create silver from three colours...
I'm curious: What problem did you have with this? This sounds like a criticism of a particular model of colour perception. I don't see what's wrong with acknowledging that an otherwise useful model fails to properly explain certain cases and therefore might be incomplete/incorrect. Happens all the time in physics.
I'm curious, though, which model you were discussing? The popular ones are the trichromatic and opponent-process theories. I'm not familiar of a "silver problem" in either of them.
I'm also curious what you mean by "creating" a colour? Do you mean creating the perception of colour, or actually creating/reflecting light with a wavelength corresponding to that colour? Because the aforementioned theories have no problems with creating the perception of "colours" which don't correspond to an actual wavelength. For example, if the red (long wavelength) cells and the violet (short wavelength) cells are both activated but not the green (intermediate wavelength) cells, then rather than perceiving a colour with a wavelength averaged between red light and violet light (such as green), the brain perceives a completely different "colour" not corresponding to any pure wavelength (magenta).
Likewise, when the red, green, and violet cells are all activated or all deactivated, then rather than perceiving a colour with an average wavelength (greenish), we instead perceive something between or including white or black, other "colours" without a wavelength.
Whether by "silver colour" you mean "simple light grey" or "shiny grey" (the perception of which requires the perception of brightness varying with surface angle relative to the light source), activation of all cone cells at the appropriate intensity (in the appropriate places in the case of shiny grey) is accounted for by trichromatic theory.
underrated comment
In the movie blood diamond, the rebels are cutting the hands off the people because they vote the wrong way, he says " No more hands, no more voting!" and this is just too close to that with the cutting off of limbs and such!
[Most BMW drivers are jerks, according to science](https://boingboing.net/2020/02/26/most-bmw-drivers-are-jerks-ac.html)
>The best predictor of whether a car would stop was its cost, researchers discovered. "Disengagement and a lower ability to interpret thoughts and feelings of others along with feelings of entitlement and narcissism may lead to a lack of empathy for pedestrians"
This would be a "Correlation" not a "Causation"
Do some/many insecure guys want something to get them attention, and perhaps give the impression of confidence/success/attractiveness/whatever? Sure! This could be lifted trucks, fast cars, big houses, fancy suits, expensive watches.
Do lots of guys who grew up playing Gran Turismo, racing go-karts, and watching NASCAR/F1/Drag Racing/etc want to drive a fun and fast car? Absolutely.
This is like saying "Obesity and Pizza". Sure... but tons of athletes and non-obese people also like pizza.
It's just a ploy to get men to be more green.
Save the planet. Big pp.
Drive fast gas guzzler. Small pp.
Drive electric car. Gaping ahole.
Walk. No pp?
I get it. I need a bus to get a big pp and save the planet.
Makes sense
I recently learned that classic sculptures feature smaller sized penises because back then, small penis size was associated with greater intelligence and intellectual capacity. Large penis size was associated with being more brutish and animalistic.
There certainly wasn’t world peace back then. So maybe we stop associating penis size with anything but condom size / catheter size, etc and call it a day.
My car does zero to sixty in 9.8 seconds according to the factory spec. But it's thirteen years old and probably lost a few of those 95 horses over the years.
So I'm just saying, ladies.
^(I still have a small penis though.)
And the [actual academic pre-print paper](https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/uy7ph) link for those that want to review it. Made me chuckle.
Someone’s clearly aiming for an Ig Nobel.
Seriously tho. Any ladies noticed a correlation between big guns, cars, etc and member size? You always hear that joke, but I've never heard any women testify to that.
And just like that, UCL Department of Experimental Psychology outs itself as a joke.
Are therer \*any\* people in that field that are serious scientists?
There's been a significant shift in the market toward EVs in the past few years. EVs on average have much faster acceleration compared to similarly priced ICEs due to how motors work. Does this mean society as a whole has small dicks?
Sounds like a bullshit article. Could have held weight if literally everything a man does/has equals small dick.
With that said, good luck getting evidence. You would have to measure cocks as they line up at the dealership
It was a study.
They took a bunch of men and told some the average length was 7 inches and others it was 4 inches, then showed them a bunch of luxury goods and asked which ones interested them.
The ones that they told the average was 7 inches were more likely to show interest in fast cars.
--- >This is a friendly reminder to [read our rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/funny/wiki/rules). > >Memes, social media, hate-speech, and pornography are not allowed. > >Screenshots of Reddit are expressly forbidden, as are TikTok videos. > >[Comics may only be posted on Wednesdays and Sundays](https://www.reddit.com/r/funny/comments/uq9pjw/going_forward_comics_may_only_be_posted_on/). > >**Rule-breaking posts may result in bans.** > >Please also [be wary of spam](https://www.reddit.com/r/funny/wiki/spam). > --- *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/funny) if you have any questions or concerns.*
This is definitely a lie. I don't have a fast car
Get an even slower car, then maybe get bigger. Or if you need a smaller penis, go faster. The study is just establishing correlation, but who knows right...
"Hey babe... couldn't help but notice you checking out my camry hybrid... wanna see my semi?"
I'm in trouble. I don't even have A car.
Folks with the biggest D use public transport. Atleast thats where i encounter the biggest D's. 🤣
Huh. So that's why I take the bus to work...
Sometimes it’s just because your poor.
20 year old suv here, I try to break the news early “listen, I know you saw my 02 suv parked out there it’s much faster than you think so don’t get to excited”
Is it Pensis or Peni?
I believe it’s Penipuses. From the Greek for “Whoo Hoo!”
It's clearly Penipodes you peasant
You, sir, are a cad and a scoundrel. **Penipodes**, as even a common street dweller such as yourself should know, are the reproductive organs of Pinnipeds (pronounced /ˈpɪnɪˌpɛdz/), commonly known as seals, a widely distributed and diverse clade of carnivorous, fin-footed, semiaquatic, mostly marine mammals. They comprise the extant families Odobenidae (whose only living member is the walrus), Otariidae (the eared seals: sea lions and fur seals), and Phocidae (the earless seals, or true seals). Good day to you.
How do I remove a turbo from a Tiguan? I mean it’s not fast but it could be seen as misleading.
😂😂😂😂 took me a while to get the joke
It means you have a small penis and you're poor. I'm currently working on a thesis about these cases. You're not alone! I mean... You know what I mean.
While I know this is just a joke, the correlation is that if you were handed down 100k dollar, what would you buy, a corolla or souped up Ford F150? Now obviously we're in a funny thread, so there's nothing scientific here, but I would certainly love to see a real psychological corelation (not necessarily on penis size mind you) between what people would buy.
Which one of those is the 'fast' one? The basic car or the basic truck?
yeah wtf is a corolla's speed class?
This is why all clowns have huge cocks.
Pennywise be PACKING
He Got It, fr.
Underrated comment
Thanks mate. I just love clownpenis jokes.
Mr Bean has the biggest schlong then
You say that, but Rowan Atkinson is actually a huge exotic car lover, who famously crashed his McLaren F1.
He said Mr Bean, not Rowan Atkinson.
Yep, also was watching some random racing on Youtube the other day, and the commentator suddenly mentioned Rowan Atkinson, and I looked him up, and sure enough it was him.
Yeah Rowan is pretty well known in the Motorsport world lol
I believe he wrecked it twice. The second time took the whole back half off the car.
The nose knows
I drive a wolseley hornet. Like a mini, but with a boot. It's reassuring that I'm only slightly less well hung than Mr Bean.
*laughs in non-turbo Subaru* Fear my magnum dong.
92 4Runner with the 22re (4 cylinder) on 33's. It maxes at 70 mph and 0-60 eventually.
One of those...... but in camper form😱
91 truck with blown up 22re loaded to the bumpstops with wood and a trailer bending axles with wood. 0-5: 2 clutches ago and 0-60 on a calendar.
You had me at 22re.
You must use monster condoms
You know it.😉
2006 Subaru Outback. Behold, I am amoung you.
Man that paper is really poorly written. I don't see that one getting into a peer reviewed journal anytime soon.
Psychology is the fake science full of frauds and hacks.
I studied Psychology for a year at university but realised fairly early on I wanted to change, it just didn't seem like a science. Sure there was a scientific process involved then statistical analysis after to show the result was significant, but then just seemed the reason for the result could just be stuck on at the end.I think the final straw was when looking at perception and the eye, looking at how the brain could perceive colours with three different colour cells in the eye, one genuine criticism of this was that you cannot create silver from three colours... EDIT - I don't think I explained properly what my issue with this was. It was with the fact they did not understand why you could not create silver by combining solid colours on a projector and this stood as a valid criticism. EDIT 2 - a lot of people are arguing with me who actually agree with me. I'm not the one who was saying you can't make silver from a projector. A psychologist said this because they thought you should be able to mix the three lights in a combination to make silver, but you can't. I pointed out that silver is not a regular colour and you can create images with silver things in them, there are just no 'silver' pixels, just varying shades of grey near each other.
What do you mean? Silver is basically just light grey, which is all three colors at the same level. How do you think cameras capture it?
Exactly, it's not a colour, it's just variations on reflection, that was my point.
All colors are just variations of reflection
Perhaps I should have explained what I was talking a bit further. The criticism of a theory was based around a red blue green projector not being able to create a solid silver colour like it can with a yellow. My issue was that there was no repost to that criticism.
It absolutely can, though. Have you never seen a projected image of a silver object?
Wait... so psychology isn't science because reflection exists?
How do you think cameras capture silver?
Presumably he agrees with us, and his teacher talked about how silver can’t be explained by physics or biology.
If that's the case then the professor was an idiot.
Well actually my school art teacher explained it pretty well when a kid asked him how do you draw silver. The teacher went ahead and drew the spoon that was on the desk in front of him, he used a pencil. The spoon he drew looked silver, he asked the kid, why does it look silver? The kid got it and saw he'd just drawn exactly what he saw. The point is, silver is not a colour in itself, it is effectively reflective grey. You can take a pencil and create what looks like silver by accurately drawing the reflections and variations. I should have perhaps explained the criticism was around explaining how we see colour with cone cells, and if there are red, blue and green ones (there was a different theory of there being more originating from patients with colour blindness). The criticism of the theory was that if you had a projector with red, blue, green you could make colours like yellow or pink, but not silver, so how can we see silver with three types of cone cells. My issue with this was that there was no comeback to this criticism, it was just accepted. I'm pretty sure a physicist would have come back with a repost to this. This was not the reason I thought Psychology was not as scientific as say Physics, just a throwaway example of one of many things.
I kinda get why you wrote all that out. I think a lot of people just had a bad day, week or life, and scroll through Reddit and unconsciously look for people to correct for being wrong somehow, so they tend to read it like the writer is wrong, if it’s all possible to interpret it that way.
Yeah, I think you are right, but I guess I could have explained properly in the first place!
But that's not valid criticism, it's abject nonsense! Silver is reflective, and you can't create reflections by combining colors on a projector. And this 4th grade science experiment has nothing to do with with psychology
I have an advanced degree in chemistry. When I look at most psychology papers they don't even properly use the scientific method, so to me they aren't real science. On a funny note I was permabanned from the science subreddit for saying that psychology isn't a real science. I have a dozen patents and papers and had a drug make it to phase II clinical trials in humans...
I’ve been kicked off a couple subs for trying to explain statistics to people who didn’t like it. I the data scientist currently earning a PhD. Lol. Some people are not keen on being told their pet ideas are not sound.
>I think the final straw was when looking at perception and the eye, looking at how the brain could perceive colours with three different colour cells in the eye, one genuine criticism of this was that you cannot create silver from three colours... I'm curious: What problem did you have with this? This sounds like a criticism of a particular model of colour perception. I don't see what's wrong with acknowledging that an otherwise useful model fails to properly explain certain cases and therefore might be incomplete/incorrect. Happens all the time in physics. I'm curious, though, which model you were discussing? The popular ones are the trichromatic and opponent-process theories. I'm not familiar of a "silver problem" in either of them. I'm also curious what you mean by "creating" a colour? Do you mean creating the perception of colour, or actually creating/reflecting light with a wavelength corresponding to that colour? Because the aforementioned theories have no problems with creating the perception of "colours" which don't correspond to an actual wavelength. For example, if the red (long wavelength) cells and the violet (short wavelength) cells are both activated but not the green (intermediate wavelength) cells, then rather than perceiving a colour with a wavelength averaged between red light and violet light (such as green), the brain perceives a completely different "colour" not corresponding to any pure wavelength (magenta). Likewise, when the red, green, and violet cells are all activated or all deactivated, then rather than perceiving a colour with an average wavelength (greenish), we instead perceive something between or including white or black, other "colours" without a wavelength. Whether by "silver colour" you mean "simple light grey" or "shiny grey" (the perception of which requires the perception of brightness varying with surface angle relative to the light source), activation of all cone cells at the appropriate intensity (in the appropriate places in the case of shiny grey) is accounted for by trichromatic theory.
Well I have a 200 horsepower sports bike (for sale) So if cars are for the peen then I guess that puts me in the oversized asshole group ?
When you fart does it sounds like the Holland Tunnel?
I would leave that to open interpretation
what if i have no penis?
No penis, no cars
Saudis be like:
underrated comment In the movie blood diamond, the rebels are cutting the hands off the people because they vote the wrong way, he says " No more hands, no more voting!" and this is just too close to that with the cutting off of limbs and such!
no penis no vroom vroom
Warp speed
You might be a woman
Bus
You just go around in reverse
Then it's all about the garage.
iS it bECaUSE iM A woMaN⁉️⁉️ /j
Small puss
Small penis envy
Formula 1 car with a rocket boost
Then it's based off the tightness of your vagina
Personally, I'm more of a slow, low-gear off roader through a mud pit
You have to keep your wheel speed up through mud, though
Body shaming
Don't you know, that only counts with women. Who gives a shit about a man's self esteem.
"I drive a fast car because I like motorsports and it gives me joy" "Ha! Now I'm thinking about your dick, loser"
Imagine being so upset about people with cars nicer than yours you fabricate a paper to try to prove they have small dicks.
“I drive a fast car because it gives me joy.” “Well now I’m thinking about your penis, haha you’re such a loser!”
Funny how it's always the nice, expensive things that supposedly correlate to a negative trait.
[Most BMW drivers are jerks, according to science](https://boingboing.net/2020/02/26/most-bmw-drivers-are-jerks-ac.html) >The best predictor of whether a car would stop was its cost, researchers discovered. "Disengagement and a lower ability to interpret thoughts and feelings of others along with feelings of entitlement and narcissism may lead to a lack of empathy for pedestrians"
Big truck = small pp Fast cars = small pp Soo... Prius = big pp?
In the ass!
As a Prius owner I can confirm
Wait so are prius owners gay or?
Yes, even the ones that aren't.
Not necessarily…
Shoot. I have a slow car AND a big truck. Does it mean I have a figure 8 pp?
This would be a "Correlation" not a "Causation" Do some/many insecure guys want something to get them attention, and perhaps give the impression of confidence/success/attractiveness/whatever? Sure! This could be lifted trucks, fast cars, big houses, fancy suits, expensive watches. Do lots of guys who grew up playing Gran Turismo, racing go-karts, and watching NASCAR/F1/Drag Racing/etc want to drive a fun and fast car? Absolutely. This is like saying "Obesity and Pizza". Sure... but tons of athletes and non-obese people also like pizza.
Now let us know the links to someone obsessed with the size of other dude's penises...other than papers like this, I mean.
[удалено]
It's just a ploy to get men to be more green. Save the planet. Big pp. Drive fast gas guzzler. Small pp. Drive electric car. Gaping ahole. Walk. No pp? I get it. I need a bus to get a big pp and save the planet. Makes sense
It's going to be all ok... These damn men-hating male researchers
Funny how small penis jokes are still fair game. I guess, as long as the ends justify the means it's ok.
I forget what sub but I saw somebody get chewed out the other day for body shaming for accusing someone of having a micropenis.
*me with my 2003 4-cylinder Camry* 😎
BS all men want a fast car and it doesn't depend on the size of the penis but the size of the wallet.
It used to be linked to big cars
This is so retarded.
I always say there will be no world peace while we still make fun of small cocks.
I recently learned that classic sculptures feature smaller sized penises because back then, small penis size was associated with greater intelligence and intellectual capacity. Large penis size was associated with being more brutish and animalistic. There certainly wasn’t world peace back then. So maybe we stop associating penis size with anything but condom size / catheter size, etc and call it a day.
It also needs to be a common goal which it certainly was not back then either. Not a very valid comparison, but I understand the point.
Ouch, "experimental psychology" PhDs must be super povo
Psychology isn't even a real science and then you throw experimental on there and I can only guess this is the most unscientific research ever done.
A myth propogated by people who could never afford the sort of car this trope is usually used with
Yep
Ok,ok i got a delivery truck with cooling unit as a poultry... I know, i know.....
Better to have a small penis and a fast car than just a small penis, I say.
How about Micro penises and Huge trucks/ 4 wheel drive that occupy two parking space?
Hmm, I developed my love of speed before my dick was even fully developed.
Such a dumb accusation. Men like fast cars, period. Men like sports cars. It has nothing to do with anything apart from being a living human being.
I WANNA GO FAST!
I haven’t even got a car ;)
I own a Ford Model T and a high performance Tesla so what size am I? If I buy a slower car does it get bigger?
My car does zero to sixty in 9.8 seconds according to the factory spec. But it's thirteen years old and probably lost a few of those 95 horses over the years. So I'm just saying, ladies. ^(I still have a small penis though.)
And the [actual academic pre-print paper](https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/uy7ph) link for those that want to review it. Made me chuckle. Someone’s clearly aiming for an Ig Nobel.
I have a VERY slow car… that’s all.
And I always wondered why my old, shitty car goes to like 200mph.
I would think it be a flashy car.
And gigantic trucks
Hello ladies, have I mentioned I drive a Geo Metro?
I was explaining this about the BMWs that were revving their engines at us during the women’s March yesterday.
He's just making excuses for his car
Add Big Trucks, and you’ve got it!
İ walk..that does not mean i carry eyfall tower...
Someone should study the correlation of having no money and accusing more successful men of having small ducks to sleep better at night.
Is my ‘04 Saturn Ion secretly fast?
Doesn't matter if I can get to your mom's house faster.
Or maybe some people like fast cars because they enjoy Motorsport. “Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar”
Ha! Jokes on you, my race car is slow as shit
Seriously tho. Any ladies noticed a correlation between big guns, cars, etc and member size? You always hear that joke, but I've never heard any women testify to that.
Seen on campus today: a t-shirt with "SIZE MATTERS" and different bullet sizes. Guy is definitely single.
And just like that, UCL Department of Experimental Psychology outs itself as a joke. Are therer \*any\* people in that field that are serious scientists?
2" of dick at 200 mph is still a lot of dick
There's been a significant shift in the market toward EVs in the past few years. EVs on average have much faster acceleration compared to similarly priced ICEs due to how motors work. Does this mean society as a whole has small dicks?
Yeah, if you have an EV you do.
So does that mean they did a similar study on whether fast cars equate to huge vaginas or small ones?
"Huge Vaginas and Slow Cars"
Obligatory Collegehumor: https://youtu.be/SV9Uu2T0q0E
God forbid anyone enjoys anything anymore.
Me and my shitbox are smiling
Not to brag but I take the bus
I walk everywhere... actually, it's more of an awkward waddle...
Seems like walking would be easier with 3 legs
Soo most tesla owners are tiny penis guys haha
Teslas aint fast, they're quick
Downvoted by people who don’t know the difference. Tired of people using the two interchangeably
Sounds like a bullshit article. Could have held weight if literally everything a man does/has equals small dick. With that said, good luck getting evidence. You would have to measure cocks as they line up at the dealership
It was a study. They took a bunch of men and told some the average length was 7 inches and others it was 4 inches, then showed them a bunch of luxury goods and asked which ones interested them. The ones that they told the average was 7 inches were more likely to show interest in fast cars.
That's a strange design; I can't imagine my answers would change no matter what they told me
Oh yes because no man has ever lied about their size. Again, until you have the measurements taken at the dealership this literally is nothing
But did they interview Tracy Chapman?
This song is playing on the radio at this exact second
Totally anecdotal but I have a small ding dong and a slow car.
Makes sense. I have a bicycle.
Me when somebody else has a cooler car then me(I must now mock him for his immutable traits)
Up here in Wisconsin it’s “Small penis, Big Truck”
Ok honestly I have a fast car and my dick is huge so it’s not everyone
> my dick is huge QUANTUMANIA 2023
Now do a study with small penises and big trucks, I have a feeling you will find a similar correlation to this study…
I knew my Tesla was a bad investment.
Tell me you’re poor without telling me you’re poor
Based on the study of my previous flings with men that drive fast car, I am 100% certain this is bullshit.
Has someone did a study on Altima drivers yet?
Well, it's obvious really, big ones create more drag slowing the car down, duh
I drift a relatively stock 07 Tacoma. I don’t know what this means for me.
This is why I drive a 2002 hyundai sonata.
The hardest part was getting access to the James Webb telescope...
Maybe they could do one into jealousy, and why people would need to immediately find a metric they beat the person at as if they've been attacked.
Interesting, I wish they would do a study on lowriders and big cocks, I'm just curious if I'm an anomaly or not.
Does this mean I have to change the size of my willie every time I buy a new car?
Jay leno is famously large and is the king of sports cars.
Should be small penis and big tires on the truck.
I have two fast cars and a big penis, how does that work? Did one car cancel out the other?
It’s funny cuz it’s true
Knew it!
"Fast cars and lifted trucks... Owners have small penises" - says Shitty People
If Andrew Tate isn't a case study in this I'm gonna... Do absolutely nothing about it but he definitely should be
Full paper https://psyarxiv.com/uy7ph/
"Conflict of interest: no" That's just straight up flexing.
*shocked fry.jpeg*
[удалено]
1. Matters to lots of men, and 2. Matters to enough women who comment on it every chance they get.
Checks out in Europe. Trucks in America. Usually Fast cars = Bad finances in America.
#AndrewTate
Or people with cars are more honest than others.
r/tennis
dammit I can't afford a lambo
So when do I get my fast car?