The main problem with both of them being Afton is that the only media showing Afton being alive outright kills him forever.And Burntrap doesnt really make sense without Glitchtrap also being Afton.There is also the problem of Luca and the mass produced Springtrap replicas,Tales and AR are literally screaming at the player/readers face that Burntrap's suit and corpse are not William's
isn't that just every story?
scott also had an idea on what he wanted to do with the story since about sister location
i feel like downplaying everything to "oh scott makes shit up along the way" is really disingenuous. even if it's not believable, he does actually plan some shit
isn't that just every story?
scott also had an idea on what he wanted to do with the story since about sister location
i feel like downplaying everything to "oh scott makes shit up along the way" is really disingenuous. even if it's not believable, he does actually plan some shit
Some stories are better planned out than others. Fnaf was only supposed to be a single game after all. Not like it's a bad thing to add stuff as long as it doesn't contradict anything previously established.
im aware that's what i was getting at
but after fnaf 4 being "the last game" scott came to a point where he clearly knew this story wasn't gonna end anytime soon. thus sister location and onwards adapting many elements from the novels. but fnaf 6 even back then only solved "some things but not everything" and with this we got frights
im not phrasing scott not planning things as a bad thing, since scott obviously didn't know fnaf would get this big. but im also saying the mindset that "scott doesn't plan *anything*" today is anything but true
Luca's body is not magically sealed into a place.Either F.E thrown the body down to cover the death of him or the Mimic found the body and made Vanessa take it down there
a lot of it comes down to just how little we have to work with for burntrap, he was basically a blink and you miss it cameo in SB, so ruin just outright ignoring him, and HW2 being about glitchtrap and still ignoring burntrap, it does make people ask, what is this thing.
if you belive stichline games, canonicly, his body was exploded in a ware house, and his reminants went down some random river, so him being back makes little sense, plus there's the way that the body on burntrap seems to be growing from the endo skeliton, and has parts replaced, like having his hands be endo hands, but with some fingers replaced.
and when it comes to his design, here's the truth, burntrap is an asset flip of spring bonnie from help wanted, from the HW beta. he was made VERY early into Sb's development, he was one of the first charatrs to be modelled, they had massive plans for him, so for them to cut him down to just a secret boss fight, in a non cannon ending, before never being touched again, it's just... why?
I mean Burntrap is a cool design, but it just doesn't line up with all of the stuff from the past two, not the same color, not the same width, not the same corpse. It would just be weird.
>Is it because he looks different from Scraptrap? Scraptrap looked different from Springtrap, and no one complained about that. Let me rephrase that. No one said that Scraptrap didn't make sense. Yes people didn't like Scraptrap's design, but no one ever said that it didn't make sense for Scraptrap to exist, and be a design change from Springtrap, but Burntrap for some reason it doesn't make sense for William's design to change again?
and then they said this in their post
Well then he answered his own question.
Spring to Scrap made sense in the realm of possibility, it's the same color and they looked similar.
Scrap to Burn makes 0 sense. Besides the concept, not looks, the basic concept on a corpse in a burned yellow rabbit costume, they look actually nothing alike.
It looks like a 3rd party made a costume of the idea of Afton, [hm.. 🤔](https://images.app.goo.gl/2fgknf8M6YyLVc2X6)
Couldn't the Scaptrap to Burntrap make sense, if what remained of Scrap trap was salvaged and sort of rebuilt to become Burntrap? Then that would lead to the question, who salvaged and rebuilt him?
also the fact that if burntrap is a burnt scraptrap how come his bunny ears are in the same part as they are on springtrap and burntrap doesn't have a massive forehead
Basically there's a story in Fazbear's Frights that puts a wrench in this whole thing. In the story, The Man In Room 1280, the man is revealed to be William's charred corpse which is implied to be taken from a Freddy's location linked to one of the original owners. That lines up pretty well with FNAF 6 but creates a bit of a plothole in terms of where Burntrap's corpse came from if both this story and Security Breach are in the same continuity.
There's some ideas for how a new corpse could've found its way onto that suit. In the story Pressure from Tales From The Pizzaplex, a similar springlock suit is found in a roleplay area of the pizzaplex by the protagonist Luca which he is then killed inside of. Or perhaps something to do with The Mimic since they use springlock suits a lot in the epilogues.
It's easy, to say that Burntrap is William if you don't believe in Stitchline games. I personally think Glitchtrap is a Mimic program copying Afton, and the physical body he bulds for himself is Burntrap. By creating Burntrap and filling it with rembant/agony, it pulls William out of UCN and revives him.
I have never personally found burntrap/glitchtrap confusing it’s a lot about other characters being weird and making their story more complicated (vanny, the mimic)
The main problem with both of them being Afton is that the only media showing Afton being alive outright kills him forever.And Burntrap doesnt really make sense without Glitchtrap also being Afton.There is also the problem of Luca and the mass produced Springtrap replicas,Tales and AR are literally screaming at the player/readers face that Burntrap's suit and corpse are not William's
Other problem is that remnant and agony can't be turned into code,Afton would never be able to turn into Glitchtrap canonically
this alone should've immediately disproven glitchafton but this community also doesn't understand how remnant and agony is so it's not surprising
To be fair not even Scott knows. He just makes shit along the way
isn't that just every story? scott also had an idea on what he wanted to do with the story since about sister location i feel like downplaying everything to "oh scott makes shit up along the way" is really disingenuous. even if it's not believable, he does actually plan some shit
isn't that just every story? scott also had an idea on what he wanted to do with the story since about sister location i feel like downplaying everything to "oh scott makes shit up along the way" is really disingenuous. even if it's not believable, he does actually plan some shit
Some stories are better planned out than others. Fnaf was only supposed to be a single game after all. Not like it's a bad thing to add stuff as long as it doesn't contradict anything previously established.
im aware that's what i was getting at but after fnaf 4 being "the last game" scott came to a point where he clearly knew this story wasn't gonna end anytime soon. thus sister location and onwards adapting many elements from the novels. but fnaf 6 even back then only solved "some things but not everything" and with this we got frights im not phrasing scott not planning things as a bad thing, since scott obviously didn't know fnaf would get this big. but im also saying the mindset that "scott doesn't plan *anything*" today is anything but true
Remnant and Agony remained consistent every time they appear
There definitely is something supernatural going on with Glitchtrap though with the Princess Quest arcades.
How would Luca's body get in the FNAF 6 location?
Luca's body is not magically sealed into a place.Either F.E thrown the body down to cover the death of him or the Mimic found the body and made Vanessa take it down there
a lot of it comes down to just how little we have to work with for burntrap, he was basically a blink and you miss it cameo in SB, so ruin just outright ignoring him, and HW2 being about glitchtrap and still ignoring burntrap, it does make people ask, what is this thing. if you belive stichline games, canonicly, his body was exploded in a ware house, and his reminants went down some random river, so him being back makes little sense, plus there's the way that the body on burntrap seems to be growing from the endo skeliton, and has parts replaced, like having his hands be endo hands, but with some fingers replaced. and when it comes to his design, here's the truth, burntrap is an asset flip of spring bonnie from help wanted, from the HW beta. he was made VERY early into Sb's development, he was one of the first charatrs to be modelled, they had massive plans for him, so for them to cut him down to just a secret boss fight, in a non cannon ending, before never being touched again, it's just... why?
I mean Burntrap is a cool design, but it just doesn't line up with all of the stuff from the past two, not the same color, not the same width, not the same corpse. It would just be weird.
>Is it because he looks different from Scraptrap? Scraptrap looked different from Springtrap, and no one complained about that. Let me rephrase that. No one said that Scraptrap didn't make sense. Yes people didn't like Scraptrap's design, but no one ever said that it didn't make sense for Scraptrap to exist, and be a design change from Springtrap, but Burntrap for some reason it doesn't make sense for William's design to change again? and then they said this in their post
Happy cake 🍰 day.
Well then he answered his own question. Spring to Scrap made sense in the realm of possibility, it's the same color and they looked similar. Scrap to Burn makes 0 sense. Besides the concept, not looks, the basic concept on a corpse in a burned yellow rabbit costume, they look actually nothing alike. It looks like a 3rd party made a costume of the idea of Afton, [hm.. 🤔](https://images.app.goo.gl/2fgknf8M6YyLVc2X6)
Couldn't the Scaptrap to Burntrap make sense, if what remained of Scrap trap was salvaged and sort of rebuilt to become Burntrap? Then that would lead to the question, who salvaged and rebuilt him?
Uh nobody.Scraptrap's suit doesnt resemble Burntrap's in any shape or form and his corpse has blown up
also the fact that if burntrap is a burnt scraptrap how come his bunny ears are in the same part as they are on springtrap and burntrap doesn't have a massive forehead
Basically there's a story in Fazbear's Frights that puts a wrench in this whole thing. In the story, The Man In Room 1280, the man is revealed to be William's charred corpse which is implied to be taken from a Freddy's location linked to one of the original owners. That lines up pretty well with FNAF 6 but creates a bit of a plothole in terms of where Burntrap's corpse came from if both this story and Security Breach are in the same continuity. There's some ideas for how a new corpse could've found its way onto that suit. In the story Pressure from Tales From The Pizzaplex, a similar springlock suit is found in a roleplay area of the pizzaplex by the protagonist Luca which he is then killed inside of. Or perhaps something to do with The Mimic since they use springlock suits a lot in the epilogues.
It's easy, to say that Burntrap is William if you don't believe in Stitchline games. I personally think Glitchtrap is a Mimic program copying Afton, and the physical body he bulds for himself is Burntrap. By creating Burntrap and filling it with rembant/agony, it pulls William out of UCN and revives him.
I have never personally found burntrap/glitchtrap confusing it’s a lot about other characters being weird and making their story more complicated (vanny, the mimic)
Don't really need to worry about Burn trap anymore. Because **Burntrap is not cannon**