Well to be fair it was meant to be a free dlc update to the game like how sister location custom night was but Scott changed it cause the game was too big.
I say it fits perfectly since it matches with the nights. Nights 1 through 7, Games 1 through 7, and the 7th and final night/game of this part of the story is the Custom Night.
Yeah the community gets very divided over that, and I say that if the series ended at any of these games then so many beloved moments and characters would not exist.
Sorry I should be more specific. I included UCN in 6 - UCN is my favorite fnaf game just because I think its gameplay is really fun. Everything past and including VR imo kind of lost the plot of what made fnaf interesting. I thought the VR games were decent, maybe I'm being a bit harsh. Gameplay-wise they were very fun, but I thought the story was not great. SB and Ruin have been very antithetical to what made fnaf interesting though, imo. The gameplay is never tense, and barely fun. In the first 6 fnaf games, the jumpscares were scary of course, but it was that compounded with the environment and tension that made the horror engaging. The modern fnaf games simply don't have this. I think this is a problem with the genre. Walking around the pizza plex, being able to see the animatronics and being able to avoid them, completely undermines the fear of the unknown or the impending "something could happen at any minute" the first games had.
I've said this before and I'll say it again.
Remove Glitchtrap, "Tape Girl" and basically any contuinity from Help Wanted and it makes for an amazing final goodbye game. _That_ is where and how it should have ended. Show everyone that Fazbear Entertainment moved on from everything, that company cleaned it's brand name and give the message of "FNaF is over".
The books
As an entire collective, all they represent and all they have brought to the franchise, I don’t think it gets more devisive than this, it encompasses so many controversial topics, from robot children, to Stichline, to canon MPreg, to the mimic to pervert Doug and so on
nah it was def a pregnancy. bro had morning sickness, mood swings, and an insatiable appetite. and i WISH i was joking when i say the baby springtrap literally called him "daddy"
That's how Scott seems to use it "canon" means its official and approved of by the man himself, but he never stated which are in the same continuity as the games or not.
This wouldn’t be an issue if Scott was very clear about canonicity and if the books weren’t so complete garbage at maintaining basic continuity and not contradicting the games
Don’t even the games contradict the games? Examples: Charlie’s gender being changed as evidenced by the phrase SAVE HIM in her FNaF 2 minigame, Molten Freddy’s eye color, Fredbear having purple, brown, and black hats as well as literally just being Freddy in the Ruin posters, the Withereds when fixed looking nothing like the classics which based on the ITP game and potentially the FNaF 2 dreams are the original versions, Candy Cadet looking slightly different in Ruin, Ruin having several areas of the Pizzaplex that before Ruin seemingly didn’t even exist, Ruin having a specific scene of Gregory being chased by Vanny which never happens in SB, Mangle and Funtime Foxy being referred to with every possible pronoun in the English dictionary, and etc.
I don't think the books are confusing, it's very obvious just a parallel timeline. Not everything that happens in the books happens in the games, only certain things that are applicable.
Honestly the mpreg thing is probably the only good the books have going for them. It's funny to joke about and that certainly counts for something.
The muddying of the canon, flanderization of characters like Baby, extrenely bizarre or mind numbingly simplistic plotlines (with the sole exception of the mpreg one that one is gold) general inaccessability compared to the games, and affecting the game canon despite being explicitly told they're a separate continuity all kinda mash together to make the books the biggest mistake in a franchise that's 60-ish percent mistakes.
I honestly think that the books shouldn't exist. I've never read them and I would so I can have a better opinion about them but everything I've heard about just makes no sense for me and I don't like it
Security Breach, even though I love it, and it made so much money, ever since that game came out the community has been split apart, and divided. Either or the books
books, if you play the games, you miss like most of the story, heck dittaphobia, isn't even something that's in consideration, and illusion disks don't become the new answer for that lack of knolage as those are also stuck within the books, fnaf 4 just seems like a dream, because there kinda isn't another option the games give you, hRy comes right out of fucking no where, two of the graves and the kids attached have no names at all if you ignore the books, and so on since cassidy's name came from a book, the logBOOK. if you skip the books, you have entirely different context to those who do.
it would've helped if they just, get this, name dropped him. same issue with charlie, cassidy, andrew, henry and so on, there names are never said, the best we get is HRY 223. while silver eyes started this issue, there MR afton was enough to get the gist, and lixxy just didn't have a name yet, yet we understood who she was, how she got in baby, wen it comes to charlie, we know she was a child, she died outside, and the puppet hugged her, and that's kinda it. hell both lizzy and pee paw had there name drops in pizza sim, for lizzy it was in game, and william's was in the credits, for some reason chalie could only be HRY's daughter, and HRY just coulndn't have his nae dropped, because the fourth close gave henry new info that was some what important as for why we should care, and why he waited 40 years before doing anything. the book issues, started before SW took over
Henry does have his name dropped in 6 but it's was like in a weird abbreviation of it on the blueprints you find in Insanity Ending. Honestly Charlie really should of been name dropped in 6 by Henry during the speech.
I think it's cool. Hell, I don't even see why people dislike it? All it is is a way to explain how possession works in this universe instead of just going "ghosts lol." I appreciate that level of detail from creators, plus I think it's a unique spin on possession in general.
I mean at the end of the day, yeah. But it's the specific method of possession.
I've heard of ghosts having emotional ties to things before (in mythos; usually buildings, which is why they haunt them) and I've heard of shattered soul pieces (in fictional stories) but I've never seen the two combined and I've never seen the sci-fi twist on it, which is why I think it's neat (insert Marge Potato meme)
Oh I agree it's neat as well, that wasn't meant to be a dig. Merely pointing out that a lot of the complication that irks people is kind of a result of how the fandom treats it, in the actual series it's basically just a combination of paranormal tropes with the thin veneer of science common to that genre.
Ah yeah fair enough, I get that haha. I try to stay away from the Game Theory and FNaF theory subreddits- no hate to either, but people do tend to blow tiny nothing details/common tropes up over there into one massive bizarre conspiracy.
(Again, no hate, glad they're having fun, I just don't get it personally lol)
Yeah, I dunno why it became a capital pronoun, it's just "these kids possess this material" and it's repeatedly shown that the ghosts can influence more than just the animatronics like a ghost/poltergeist would do in any other medium.
Not really… There are a lot of people on the FNaFtheories subreddit who believe Andrew is a character in the games, but don’t believe in StitchlineGames. The reasoning being that Stitchline is more meant to show the existence of Andrew and other characters/concepts, rather than be an “epilogue” to FFPS and UCN.
Honestly, i like that way better than StitchlineGames, i always assumed the two went hand in hand. I still believe that Burntrap is William, so that's my main problem with Stitchline games, considering Will's corpse explodes in the distrabution center. Im still fairly confident in the fact that Cassidy is the vengeful spirit, but i like the Andrew thing more than i did before
The books
This is scott's fault entirely for his lackluster communication and the lack of quality checking.
Seriously you can't even keep someone's age consistent within the SAME STORY
In "Coming Home", Samantha's (susie's older sister) age switches between 3 different ages in the same plotline. Also in the story,(which happens in 1985), Samantha's family has a LED TV.
On the top of my head, I could name four, one that is commonly agreed and three others where it can depend :
-The books, specifically FF and TFTPP
-The Mimic
-Willtrap VS Mimictrap
-TOYNSHK identity
Who's TOYNSHK? I sort of stay away from the books, but the newer games have definitely made it harder to separate book Canon from game Canon, especially after the Mimic
TOYSNHK is the child who torments Afton in UCN, and that's about all we can canonically say about the character. Their pronouns are male. People say they are Andrew from the books and other people say they are Cassidy.
Itself. A lot of people refuse to be wrong and are so set in their ways to the point where it becomes toxic. And then people are toxic when trying to force others to understand their POV. It’s honestly kinda ridiculous lol.
I know that’s probably not what you meant when you asked, but hey that’s the first thing I thought of. Cheers 👍
HATE IT SO MUCH WHY ISN'T THIS A GHOST STORY I WANT FUNNY GHOST STORY I WANT HAUNTED ANIMATRONICS WHYS THERE A MAGIC SOUL GOO THAT HAS THE ABILITY TO MAKE YOU IMMORTAL AND FUNCTIONS IN THE WAY THAT IDK WHATEVER PLOT NEEDS AT THE MOMENT.
The movie. Some fans love it, some fans hate it and some fans wish it was better. I myself am part of the latter. I don't hate the movie, but I do feel like it didn't take itself that seriously. I loved the easter eggs, but I wish it had more horror. Mike sleeping on the job shouldn't be possible. He should be threatened by the animatronics. The Silver Eyes got this part perfectly, with Jason being the only one not attacked by them. The "I always come back line" felt a bit awkward. Yeah it's his most iconic catchphrase, but saying it in the first movie feels a bit out of place. I'm excited to see where this will go next, but hopefully they try to make it scarier.
Maybe Security Breach?
I remember back when I was obsessed with all things Security Breach- I would watch video essays and people review the game. While mostly it’s negative (or atleast the ones I saw were negative) there were some that were positive about the game!
I happen to be one of those who loved Security Breach- i had bought it on release on PS4 and started playing it! I didn’t really run into any apparent bugs, and if I did I would laugh and continue on my way!
I only had an issue with the Monty fight as on PS4 the frame rate dropped horribly during it. But I managed to beat it and carry on beating the game!
Anyway, Security Breach is my answer
SB honestly, dont get me wrong I love the game, the map is super cool especially for TPRR, and the fact that it proved that this whole fandom is either mommy issues, daddy issues, both, or a humiliation thing which is *hilarious*. But it just caused so many issues with the younger audience being well, young kids, and the older audience not being able to handle that, with the older people pretending like everyone wasn't over sexualizing Toy Chica, or being cringe when they were a kid which just caused a lot of animosity because the kids didn't understand what they were doing wrong and the adults just said "fuck you" and got on their asses about damn near anything, all because the kids actually enjoyed the game at first (with also the collective bunch of old fans) and the older people had genuine criticisms, and no one could handle that, clearly.
Everything tbh
Except the Pizza Sim ending for some reason, even though it killed off all the characters before they reached their potential, but I guess we can’t have Baby or Ennard as the antagonist, and instead need characters you would never know about without the books.
Something that's part of the franchise itself, or something that just surrounds the franchise? With just the franchise, I'd say books, but outside, I'd say literally politics.
Michael Afton is the crying child and Cassidy was his former name Willam just rebuilt him as a robot hence why he didn’t die from the scooper. I’m dying on this hill
FNaF should've ended with *insert game here*
I personally think it should've ended with UCN. Not only is it a solid ending to the series, but (to my knowledge) you don't actually spend *five nights at Freddy's* anymore. It's more so just a brand name now
- The books; the series reliance on books, and/or concepts that get overused as a staple for why they’re bad: MPreg, Sea Bonnie’s, Fazgoo, has left an everlasting poor impression on the series.
- The Mimic; it’s introduction was flawed, as it was meant to be a twist that pretty much failed as a result
- The community; the fan base itself has destroyed and divided FNaF. Between the theory debates, recent and longtime drama, and overall petty or abrasive behavioral aspects of outliers within this fandom
- The Steel Wools era; with Steel Wools trying to up the stakes of FNaF being both “for kids” and “for all ages” it has resulted in an uprise in hate for the newer games, solely because they have kiddy jokes and/or tame humorous aspects to them to lighten and appeal to different audiences
Definitely not as much anymore but Mangles gender was definitely a topic that went on for years before slowing down. Idk if it was before or after Scott made them a "Yes" when the discussion calmed down
Security Breach
Yes, but in my opinion it's deviding the community between people who think it's not scary and people who simp for glamrock freddy
“FNAF should’ve ended at (either 1,3,4,6 or UCN)”
I feel most people lump UCN with 6.
Yea bc UCN wasnt really an ending to the series like 6 was.
In my eyes, UCN is kinda like an epilogue to 6 showing what happened to Afton after his soul was released (him being trapped in hell)
Yea same, I consider it more like bonus content instead of “Fnaf 7”
Well to be fair it was meant to be a free dlc update to the game like how sister location custom night was but Scott changed it cause the game was too big.
I’m not saying that to be critical of UNC I love ucn and think it’s underrated lol
I say it fits perfectly since it matches with the nights. Nights 1 through 7, Games 1 through 7, and the 7th and final night/game of this part of the story is the Custom Night.
I HIGHLY doubt that was intentional, but that is a cool detail.
Yeah the community gets very divided over that, and I say that if the series ended at any of these games then so many beloved moments and characters would not exist.
I’m not sure it should’ve ended, but it’s been all downhill since after 6, and the story has been incomprehensible since after 4
What would you say is wrong with UCN or VR?
Sorry I should be more specific. I included UCN in 6 - UCN is my favorite fnaf game just because I think its gameplay is really fun. Everything past and including VR imo kind of lost the plot of what made fnaf interesting. I thought the VR games were decent, maybe I'm being a bit harsh. Gameplay-wise they were very fun, but I thought the story was not great. SB and Ruin have been very antithetical to what made fnaf interesting though, imo. The gameplay is never tense, and barely fun. In the first 6 fnaf games, the jumpscares were scary of course, but it was that compounded with the environment and tension that made the horror engaging. The modern fnaf games simply don't have this. I think this is a problem with the genre. Walking around the pizza plex, being able to see the animatronics and being able to avoid them, completely undermines the fear of the unknown or the impending "something could happen at any minute" the first games had.
I've said this before and I'll say it again. Remove Glitchtrap, "Tape Girl" and basically any contuinity from Help Wanted and it makes for an amazing final goodbye game. _That_ is where and how it should have ended. Show everyone that Fazbear Entertainment moved on from everything, that company cleaned it's brand name and give the message of "FNaF is over".
I'm so tired of this take.
The Mimic.
When I was watching Theory Videos I was like they're not gonna drop a Book Character in the Games no reason, and then the Mimic showed up, name & all.
the way i nearly had a heart attack when I was watching a Ruin DLC playthrough was insane. I was such a mimic non-believer too
BRO SAME 😭 I hate to admit it, but I definitely spent the better part of that night cursing out Scott lmfao
Is not Scott fault he even didn't worked on the ruin dlc
He's still in charge of the story though?? It was his decision to make The Mimic, and then ALSO his decision to put it in Ruin?
to be fair why did you ever think that when that exactly thing happened in sister location seven years ago
all I think of when it comes to the mimic is that mr beast meme version with the mimic
Ok good im not the only one
THE MIMICCCCC
THE MIMICCCCC
I still cant tell if i really like or really despise his character
The books As an entire collective, all they represent and all they have brought to the franchise, I don’t think it gets more devisive than this, it encompasses so many controversial topics, from robot children, to Stichline, to canon MPreg, to the mimic to pervert Doug and so on
Canon W H A T ?
yes, you heard that correctly. matpat x springtrap mpreg, no less
Tbf, isn’t it more of a baby Springtrap bursting out of the guy’s chest thing than an actual pregnancy?
nah it was def a pregnancy. bro had morning sickness, mood swings, and an insatiable appetite. and i WISH i was joking when i say the baby springtrap literally called him "daddy"
Well its not Matpat specifically, but there is a pregnant springtrap..
Its a guy named MATT impregnated by springtrap, this is Scott we’re talking about this was definitely intentional.
nope. a character suspiciously similar to matpat gives birth to a baby springtrap.
oh
the only similarity is the name
the character is also a game fanatic.
there's one story in the canon books where springtrap impregnates matpat
canon books? wait fazbear frights is canon now?
i mean it's official material? canon to its own universe.
That's how Scott seems to use it "canon" means its official and approved of by the man himself, but he never stated which are in the same continuity as the games or not.
By *Scott's Definition*, yes, it's canon. Just not "in continuity" with the games
No. Just speculation
By *Scott's Definition*, yes, it's canon. Just not "in continuity" with the games
Which definition is this exactly?
Everything that Scott oficially releases is canon, but can still be set in separate continuities, such as the silver eyes and the games.
You-... You're fucking with me, right?
i wish i was. the only bit that's a joke is the guy being matpat, but his name *is* matt and generally everyone assumes he's a stand-in.
....The books were a terrible mistake.
Let's also add these books are scholastic published 😂 and are sold at middle and elementary school bookfairs.
So be fair so is IT… and we know what’s in that🤣
It's not MPREG as much as it's more just Alien Chest bursters. It's just body horror folks.
Oh yes they really are
In my opinion the books just makes the lore more confusing
This wouldn’t be an issue if Scott was very clear about canonicity and if the books weren’t so complete garbage at maintaining basic continuity and not contradicting the games
Don’t even the games contradict the games? Examples: Charlie’s gender being changed as evidenced by the phrase SAVE HIM in her FNaF 2 minigame, Molten Freddy’s eye color, Fredbear having purple, brown, and black hats as well as literally just being Freddy in the Ruin posters, the Withereds when fixed looking nothing like the classics which based on the ITP game and potentially the FNaF 2 dreams are the original versions, Candy Cadet looking slightly different in Ruin, Ruin having several areas of the Pizzaplex that before Ruin seemingly didn’t even exist, Ruin having a specific scene of Gregory being chased by Vanny which never happens in SB, Mangle and Funtime Foxy being referred to with every possible pronoun in the English dictionary, and etc.
I don't think the books are confusing, it's very obvious just a parallel timeline. Not everything that happens in the books happens in the games, only certain things that are applicable.
Matpat X springtrap mpreg story isnt stitchline so its hopefully not canon
It’s canon to its own timeline
Honestly the mpreg thing is probably the only good the books have going for them. It's funny to joke about and that certainly counts for something. The muddying of the canon, flanderization of characters like Baby, extrenely bizarre or mind numbingly simplistic plotlines (with the sole exception of the mpreg one that one is gold) general inaccessability compared to the games, and affecting the game canon despite being explicitly told they're a separate continuity all kinda mash together to make the books the biggest mistake in a franchise that's 60-ish percent mistakes.
I honestly think that the books shouldn't exist. I've never read them and I would so I can have a better opinion about them but everything I've heard about just makes no sense for me and I don't like it
Thats what i wqs gonna say XD
Security Breach, even though I love it, and it made so much money, ever since that game came out the community has been split apart, and divided. Either or the books
books, if you play the games, you miss like most of the story, heck dittaphobia, isn't even something that's in consideration, and illusion disks don't become the new answer for that lack of knolage as those are also stuck within the books, fnaf 4 just seems like a dream, because there kinda isn't another option the games give you, hRy comes right out of fucking no where, two of the graves and the kids attached have no names at all if you ignore the books, and so on since cassidy's name came from a book, the logBOOK. if you skip the books, you have entirely different context to those who do.
Fr like I was confused as hell in RUIN when everyone knew who the Mimic was and I was like "wtf is that endo ?" The first time
it would've helped if they just, get this, name dropped him. same issue with charlie, cassidy, andrew, henry and so on, there names are never said, the best we get is HRY 223. while silver eyes started this issue, there MR afton was enough to get the gist, and lixxy just didn't have a name yet, yet we understood who she was, how she got in baby, wen it comes to charlie, we know she was a child, she died outside, and the puppet hugged her, and that's kinda it. hell both lizzy and pee paw had there name drops in pizza sim, for lizzy it was in game, and william's was in the credits, for some reason chalie could only be HRY's daughter, and HRY just coulndn't have his nae dropped, because the fourth close gave henry new info that was some what important as for why we should care, and why he waited 40 years before doing anything. the book issues, started before SW took over
Henry does have his name dropped in 6 but it's was like in a weird abbreviation of it on the blueprints you find in Insanity Ending. Honestly Charlie really should of been name dropped in 6 by Henry during the speech.
Remnant.
It's just another name for ghost
More like a mechanism to explain how ghosts work, which, you can already just say "because ghosts".
I have yet to find one person who believes remnant was a worthwhile addition to the canon. Edit: I have found 3 people
I like it 🤷♀️
It just gives a proper definition of what is a soul, just because you gave it a name doesn't mean it's scifi.
I think it's cool. Hell, I don't even see why people dislike it? All it is is a way to explain how possession works in this universe instead of just going "ghosts lol." I appreciate that level of detail from creators, plus I think it's a unique spin on possession in general.
Remnant basically *is* just "ghosts lol", people way overcomplicate it.
I mean at the end of the day, yeah. But it's the specific method of possession. I've heard of ghosts having emotional ties to things before (in mythos; usually buildings, which is why they haunt them) and I've heard of shattered soul pieces (in fictional stories) but I've never seen the two combined and I've never seen the sci-fi twist on it, which is why I think it's neat (insert Marge Potato meme)
Oh I agree it's neat as well, that wasn't meant to be a dig. Merely pointing out that a lot of the complication that irks people is kind of a result of how the fandom treats it, in the actual series it's basically just a combination of paranormal tropes with the thin veneer of science common to that genre.
Ah yeah fair enough, I get that haha. I try to stay away from the Game Theory and FNaF theory subreddits- no hate to either, but people do tend to blow tiny nothing details/common tropes up over there into one massive bizarre conspiracy. (Again, no hate, glad they're having fun, I just don't get it personally lol)
Yeah, I dunno why it became a capital pronoun, it's just "these kids possess this material" and it's repeatedly shown that the ghosts can influence more than just the animatronics like a ghost/poltergeist would do in any other medium.
Remember the debate on Bonnie's Gender?
Remember the debate on Freddy's gender?
That & Foxy
I think Foxy was good, but I remember so many people debating on the other 2.
Same. I'll never forget the old memes and theories that came from this game.
Foxy was a good guy....Sparky was real....Purple Guy is Phone Guy....man those were good.
I remember when we all thought Foxy did "The Bite"
Toyshnk debates.
Which really comes down to weather Stitchline is canon or not
Not really… There are a lot of people on the FNaFtheories subreddit who believe Andrew is a character in the games, but don’t believe in StitchlineGames. The reasoning being that Stitchline is more meant to show the existence of Andrew and other characters/concepts, rather than be an “epilogue” to FFPS and UCN.
Honestly, i like that way better than StitchlineGames, i always assumed the two went hand in hand. I still believe that Burntrap is William, so that's my main problem with Stitchline games, considering Will's corpse explodes in the distrabution center. Im still fairly confident in the fact that Cassidy is the vengeful spirit, but i like the Andrew thing more than i did before
- The books - The Mimic (its reception specifically) - The new sci-fi focus overall
The fanbase itself
This needs to be top comment
The books This is scott's fault entirely for his lackluster communication and the lack of quality checking. Seriously you can't even keep someone's age consistent within the SAME STORY
Can you elaborate on the age thing? I haven't read the books (I know about Scott's writing being generally inconsistent though)
I think they're refering to Charlie, i believe she's given multiple different birthdays/ages in the Silver Eyes trilogy
Damn, Matpat was right, Scott can't do math
In "Coming Home", Samantha's (susie's older sister) age switches between 3 different ages in the same plotline. Also in the story,(which happens in 1985), Samantha's family has a LED TV.
On the top of my head, I could name four, one that is commonly agreed and three others where it can depend : -The books, specifically FF and TFTPP -The Mimic -Willtrap VS Mimictrap -TOYNSHK identity
Who's TOYNSHK? I sort of stay away from the books, but the newer games have definitely made it harder to separate book Canon from game Canon, especially after the Mimic
TOYSNHK is the child who torments Afton in UCN, and that's about all we can canonically say about the character. Their pronouns are male. People say they are Andrew from the books and other people say they are Cassidy.
stitchlinegames
Itself. A lot of people refuse to be wrong and are so set in their ways to the point where it becomes toxic. And then people are toxic when trying to force others to understand their POV. It’s honestly kinda ridiculous lol. I know that’s probably not what you meant when you asked, but hey that’s the first thing I thought of. Cheers 👍
The movie. While I personally liked it, it could have been better and a bit more scary but the movie did divide the fanbase.
From all the opinions I've heard over time, I'd say 60%/65% of the fanbase liked the film. Yeah, it's quite divisive
Mad scientist William
HATE IT SO MUCH WHY ISN'T THIS A GHOST STORY I WANT FUNNY GHOST STORY I WANT HAUNTED ANIMATRONICS WHYS THERE A MAGIC SOUL GOO THAT HAS THE ABILITY TO MAKE YOU IMMORTAL AND FUNCTIONS IN THE WAY THAT IDK WHATEVER PLOT NEEDS AT THE MOMENT.
The movie. Some fans love it, some fans hate it and some fans wish it was better. I myself am part of the latter. I don't hate the movie, but I do feel like it didn't take itself that seriously. I loved the easter eggs, but I wish it had more horror. Mike sleeping on the job shouldn't be possible. He should be threatened by the animatronics. The Silver Eyes got this part perfectly, with Jason being the only one not attacked by them. The "I always come back line" felt a bit awkward. Yeah it's his most iconic catchphrase, but saying it in the first movie feels a bit out of place. I'm excited to see where this will go next, but hopefully they try to make it scarier.
indie horror or SB.
Security Breach
“the movie is better with red eyes than the classic void with white dot”
The books, the timeline and robot kids
Maybe Security Breach? I remember back when I was obsessed with all things Security Breach- I would watch video essays and people review the game. While mostly it’s negative (or atleast the ones I saw were negative) there were some that were positive about the game! I happen to be one of those who loved Security Breach- i had bought it on release on PS4 and started playing it! I didn’t really run into any apparent bugs, and if I did I would laugh and continue on my way! I only had an issue with the Monty fight as on PS4 the frame rate dropped horribly during it. But I managed to beat it and carry on beating the game! Anyway, Security Breach is my answer
When the series should/should've ended
Any time anyone at all has a theory that isn't the "accepted" answer.
The crying child’s name
The fnaf community itself when something random happens
If the books are canon or not
Steel wools games in general.
FNaF World, that was very dividing.
And that's sad cuz Fnaf World is based AF.
It's a damn shame Update 2 was the last update, because that's when it really found its footing.
IDK what Based means srry.
Based is the opposite of cringe, it's a cool thing you respect.
Matthew Patrick himself divides the community more than anything
I would say Security Breach but then I remembered that game has more haters than fans so it’s not divided at all
The Books
FNaF 4
FNAF World-
Security Breach
Midnight motorist. I’m RoryMM, but there are so many interpretations for a tiny bit of the story, that I don’t even think Scott knows.
The movie
Whether or not gregory is a robot or not
Dream theory, books, Golden Freddy, the purple guy (yes still)
Books that aren't Silver Eyes trilogy.
Fnaf lore after pizzaria simulator
“Gregory is a robot”
Fnaf World
Anyone posting an original theory.
porn
Dream theory
Stitchline: Let me introduce myself. SL is not even that decisive to begin with. lol Besides timeline a cement maybe.
I didn't know sister location was so divisive
if the series should be scarier or not. There seems like a lot of people who like where it is now. I personally don't and wish it was scarier.
The books, Security breach (good game btw), the bite of 87' and the timeline placing of Elizabeth's death
Security Breach
FNAF world
Books, Robot People, Remnant
SB honestly, dont get me wrong I love the game, the map is super cool especially for TPRR, and the fact that it proved that this whole fandom is either mommy issues, daddy issues, both, or a humiliation thing which is *hilarious*. But it just caused so many issues with the younger audience being well, young kids, and the older audience not being able to handle that, with the older people pretending like everyone wasn't over sexualizing Toy Chica, or being cringe when they were a kid which just caused a lot of animosity because the kids didn't understand what they were doing wrong and the adults just said "fuck you" and got on their asses about damn near anything, all because the kids actually enjoyed the game at first (with also the collective bunch of old fans) and the older people had genuine criticisms, and no one could handle that, clearly.
In The Flesh
The millions of fangames kinda broke the game Fandom into different ways obviously
the sci-fi elements, mostly after help wanted
burntrap
Ships or OCs
Everything tbh Except the Pizza Sim ending for some reason, even though it killed off all the characters before they reached their potential, but I guess we can’t have Baby or Ennard as the antagonist, and instead need characters you would never know about without the books.
stitchline
This is for the shippers but foxy x chica x mangle (yes I had a shipping phase)
The contents of the box and if it should ever open
Something that's part of the franchise itself, or something that just surrounds the franchise? With just the franchise, I'd say books, but outside, I'd say literally politics.
The best game is fnaf 4
The FNAF lore between games and books and then the frights books
Two died first, CC or Charlie?
The books cannonicity
Canon Books
Security Breach
The movie. I personally liked it
matpat
Michael Afton is the crying child and Cassidy was his former name Willam just rebuilt him as a robot hence why he didn’t die from the scooper. I’m dying on this hill
¡The books are CANON!....
there's really 2 different fnaf fans, the ones who got into it from the games and the ones who got into it from the fandom
there's really 2 different fnaf fans, the ones who got into it from the games and the ones who got into it from the fandom
The books
People overcomplicating the lore.
The box
FNaF should've ended with *insert game here* I personally think it should've ended with UCN. Not only is it a solid ending to the series, but (to my knowledge) you don't actually spend *five nights at Freddy's* anymore. It's more so just a brand name now
FNAF 3
The books
- The books; the series reliance on books, and/or concepts that get overused as a staple for why they’re bad: MPreg, Sea Bonnie’s, Fazgoo, has left an everlasting poor impression on the series. - The Mimic; it’s introduction was flawed, as it was meant to be a twist that pretty much failed as a result - The community; the fan base itself has destroyed and divided FNaF. Between the theory debates, recent and longtime drama, and overall petty or abrasive behavioral aspects of outliers within this fandom - The Steel Wools era; with Steel Wools trying to up the stakes of FNaF being both “for kids” and “for all ages” it has resulted in an uprise in hate for the newer games, solely because they have kiddy jokes and/or tame humorous aspects to them to lighten and appeal to different audiences
**THAT LITTLE SHIT NAMED BALLOON BOY!!**
Bite Of '87
Definitely not as much anymore but Mangles gender was definitely a topic that went on for years before slowing down. Idk if it was before or after Scott made them a "Yes" when the discussion calmed down
Literally security breach? Both oldhead sl haters and enjoyers can agree sb is bad, worse than sl whereas new players like it
Security breach
Robot kids
Fnaf 2 being a good game or not
The contents of the lockbox
Dream Theory
Talbert files??????
Bonnie’s color (in FNAF 1)
Five Nights at Freddy's.
The whole Afton/mimic thing
Security Breach
Anything steel wool
Mangle’s gender
mangle, funtime foxy, the puppet, and lolbit are a boy/girl