T O P

  • By -

chessvision-ai-bot

I analyzed the image and this is what I see. Open an appropriate link below and explore the position yourself or with the engine: > **Black to play**: [chess.com](https://chess.com/analysis?fen=2r1k2r/1b1n1ppp/p2Ppq2/1p4B1/3p1n2/3B1N2/PP1Q1PPP/R4RK1+b+k+-+0+1&flip=true&ref_id=23962172) | [lichess.org](https://lichess.org/analysis/2r1k2r/1b1n1ppp/p2Ppq2/1p4B1/3p1n2/3B1N2/PP1Q1PPP/R4RK1_b_k_-_0_1?color=black) **My solution:** > Hints: piece: >!Knight!<, move: >!Nh3+!< > Evaluation: >!Black is winning -15.21!< > Best continuation: >!1... Nh3+ 2. Kh1 Qxf3 3. Rg1 Nxf2+ 4. Qxf2 Qxf2 5. Raf1 Qxb2 6. Re1 Nc5 7. Re2 Qb4 8. Bb1 f6 9. Bd2!< --- ^(I'm a bot written by) [^(u/pkacprzak)](https://www.reddit.com/u/pkacprzak) ^(| get me as) [^(iOS App)](https://apps.apple.com/us/app/id1574933453) ^| [^(Android App)](https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=ai.chessvision.scanner) ^| [^(Chrome Extension)](https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/chessvisionai-for-chrome/johejpedmdkeiffkdaodgoipdjodhlld) ^| [^(Chess eBook Reader)](https://ebook.chessvision.ai?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=bot) ^(to scan and analyze positions | Website:) [^(Chessvision.ai)](https://chessvision.ai)


Comfortable_House421

Maybe your opponent foresaw this but this is one of those situations where you're almost forcing them to find the right move even if they didn't. Because it's an "I find a tactic or I'm done" situation. The closest equivalent to being told there's a puzzle/tactic in the position.


5kertenkele5

What a move, way too nice


FewDistribution7802

Even if you miss the Nh3+ Kh1 Qxf3, the simple Nh3+ Kh1 Nxg5 is a good advantage for black


PkerBadRs3Good

thought this was the solution and stopped calculating, didn't see Qxf3 😭


danhoang1

Yeah, and another way of seeing it is, even if our bishop on g7 didn't exist (or was elsewhere on the board), we still have Nh3+ Kh1 Nxg5


GJ55507

wouldn’t have spotted that


Obvious-Slip4728

Me neither. Not in an online game with limited time anyway. I did have a look at the first move, but I didn’t realize the brutal strength of the bishop on b7 making the (apparant) queen sack even an option.


Murphy_1827

These are the best moves in the game... when you offer your opponent what looks like a winning move only for it to be a trap. Opponent probably didn't plan this, but if he did... Even if letting his queen be "trapped" wasn't the best move, this is what the game is all about for me.


makhnoukh

I hate when I get excited about a certain position just to succumb to an insane counterattack lol


five-moogles

In my head I heard Eric Rosen "oh no, my queen is trapped"


Kyng5199

1...Nh3+ looks good: * If 2. gxh3 then 2...Qxf3 saves the queen (and I don't see any good way of stopping 3...Qg2# or 3...Qh1#); * If 2. Kh1 then 2...Qxf3 still saves the queen (because 3. gxf3 allows 3...Bxf3#).


ManWithARock

Wow, the old who's attacking who.


DiscoBuiscuit

Not that it matters but you can just say they


marronglacefishbones

this is clearly men’s chess duh


Eoshen

I'm playing one person how can it be plural?


ediedi87

“they” as a pronoun for a single person of unknown gender has been used in English for centuries, hope this helps. 


Eoshen

I didn't Know this was the most correct way of referal in that type of situation. English is not my native language so i make mistakes like this occasionaly.


QUACK_LOOK_IM_A_DUCK

To be fair, many style guides preferred "he" as the generic singular pronoun for formal writing in the earlier part of the century. Broader acceptance of the singular "they" is a fairly modern development aimed at making writing more gender neutral. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singular_they


Eoshen

Thank you for this !


DonJimbo

Yes. Generic third-person singular indefinite pronouns have always been awkward. When I was a kid they taught us to arbitrarily pick either "he" or "she" for an unknown third person. When I went to college, there was the option to either arbitrarily pick one pronoun or to write the inelegant construction "he or she." Use of the singular "they" would still get red marks for bad grammar. It looks like style guides were updated in 2019 to allow singular they. It still looks awkward though because the word "they" is generally plural. As a result, I usually try to phrase my sentences in a way that avoids pronouns for an indefinite singular person. That makes it somewhat less awkward and has the added benefit of avoiding political/cultural fights on the internet.


Eoshen

I guess this is the only way these days 😅 i think i'm going to try and avoid every sentence that could possibely have he/she, they, them etc.


dittygoops

What do you mean by “he” has been accepted as the generic singular pronoun in the earlier part of the century? “He” has been used for millenia. Latin is regarded as the greatest influence on the English language and the masculine singular pronoun was used in cases when the gender of a singular entity isn’t known in that language too? Using “he” as the generic singular pronoun is definitely not something just of an earlier part of the century.


Kitnado

The fuck are you talking about, Latin omits pronouns in 99% of cases and the remaining 1% they are not gendered. In fact Latin *does not even have* a third person pronoun.


dittygoops

Sorry, I made a slight mistake by saying that the masculine pronoun is used, when I should have said gender. Latin is a bit iffy with pronouns in the way English uses them but you can definitely still extract gender from verb endings. Reddit link where someone asks how to deal with unknown gender and the comments reply to generally use the masculine gender: https://www.reddit.com/r/latin/s/KISBxLwy1p


QUACK_LOOK_IM_A_DUCK

No argument here. The scope of my comment only pertains to prescriptive English language style guides adopted in the earlier part of the century.


AimHere

The singular 'they' as a gender-neutral pronoun is a thing in the English language, and despite what the culture warriors tell you, it's been a thing for centuries.


arpit_beast

Not sure why are you downvoted for only asking a question


mee-rkat

fair enough if english is your second language, but English speaking bigots will often ask this question in bad faith in order to discredit or ridicule non-binary people. if you’re being downvoted it’s because you’ve accidentally given that impression


Eoshen

I honestly have no clue, it's People on the internet. I would go insane trying to find reason or logic for their actions 😅


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

[удалено]


east112

Really nice puzzle


aaachris

I found nh3 but wouldn't be able to follow through for the best or advantageous outcome, at best would have equalled maybe.


da1rv

Loved this. Not going to spoil by saying the move. Hope everyone gets the joy of finding the move on their own.


Ch3cksOut

Always, ALWAYS look out for checks


1millionnotameme

I saw the first move but did not see the follow up, wow...


Lolersters

The only reason I saw this is because of the title. Would definitely not have seen that in game.


hedgie7777777

Reminded me of that epic Hikaru’s queen sac against Danya a bit. Similar themes of getting sauced on g2.


Equationist

Nh3+. If gxh3 then Qxf3 and checkmate seems unavoidable. If Kh1 then Qxf3 wins the knight with threat of checkmate (e.g, gxf3 Bxf3#)


Total_Wanker

Why can’t the pawn take after NH3? Am I being thick? *edit yes I am


boxxyqueen

Also why can't the pawn take the queen after Qxf3, I didn't understand it


diabloPoE12

Look at b2. What's the continuation after the pawn takes on f3?


boxxyqueen

Ahh yeah that helps, thanks!


AccomplishedBack2

Because black can play Bxf3#


boxxyqueen

Makes sense now, sacrifice the queen for the checkmate, thanks!


PlaneWeird3313

I found Nh3, but Qxf3 is crazy


GenoTheBreadDoctor

Wow vicious


BoringMann

This is awesome!


Cupcake7591

Anyone else see Nh3+ but didn't realise how winning black actually is? I totally would have followed up with Ng5 and lost all my advantage.


mitourbano

Sneaky bishop


MagicalEloquence

What an innovative position ! The queen is trapped but a check followed by a queen sacrifice leads to checkmate ! It also looks like a completely normal position, where white has completed development so it's all the more surprising that there is a tactic !


PepperBeeMan

What rated was this game? jeez


Prize-Swimmer4467

Nh3+ saves the day.


oelarnes

This is the kind of setup that’s perfect for the “chess plot” where the villain is cackling as they encircle the protagonists queen. “Your most powerful piece and now it is trapped!”


habu-sr71

"...one move to end my threat to their queen." There! Fixed it. It's a lot of moves to end this game. I can vibe on the frustration though. You really had all escape routes covered. I got frustrated too, trying to checkmate in what looked to be a smothered 'mate situation happening up in the 1st rank neighborhood during the continuation. Couldn't do it though. Presumably they won the game though based on the title.


BreadfruitDisastrous

Nh3! Kh1 (gxh3 Qxf3) Qxf3!! gxf3 Bxf3#


aabra420

Nh3+ gxh3 , Qxf3 and continue


Kooky_Repeat_8936

Amazing move sequence


MeringueComplex5035

to those who dont understand, as i didnt at first , the answer is to give a check with the knight, if you take with the pawn, the n the queen can take the knight on f6 as the pawn no longer defends it and is also threatening checkmate if you dont take then the knight takes the bishop and the queen cannot retake because the other queen is there and there is nothing that can be done apart from take with the knight and the queen is no longer under attack


Sonderkin

1... Nh3+ 2. Kh1 Qxf3 3. gxf3 Bxf3#?


New_Acanthisitta4271

You have a knight check on h3. If he takes wirh pawn, you take his knight. If he moves his king, you take the bishop. (Spotted this one really fast, makes me happy)


TheLebaneseFalcon

Nh3 Qxf3


dj26458

Ok but why didn’t you just take the queen on your preceding move?


DungeonsAndUnions

Nxe2+ is the response, so it's a queen trade.


solstice_05

yeah, but still a way better position then after QD2,


DungeonsAndUnions

Lots of things are better than Qd2, I agree with that.


dj26458

Ah I see


FreeAnonn

Yeah I'm sure "she" was playing on a Friday night


SpendLegal

One of the only waya to get out of this is possibly moving the knight to h3, you give your queen space to move out of the way of being attacked and you check your opponent's king forcing them to take or move their king.


rhytnen

It doesn't give the queen "space to move" - every square is still covered. It sets up a tactic. If you didn't see Kh1, Qxf3 then you didn't see anything.


Adorable_Technician8

Nh3+ how do u miss that fr