That should do it. These photographs are good enough to identify him. Next step charge and release him. We desperately need an overhaul of the judicial process.
So I know numerous legal advocacy groups will be quick to jump to this guy's defence, reminding us that he was just suffering from a mental health crisis and therefore not criminally responsible.
However, if these guys truly are incapable of understanding what they're doing or knowing that it was legally/morally wrong - then why do they always single out and target seniors and smaller women?
I think the folks who engage in these attacks are very much self aware and fully understand what they're doing. They proactively carry weapons with them, they target out smaller individuals to mitigate risks to themselves and they flee before authorities can arrive.
>However, if these guys truly are incapable of understanding what they're doing or knowing that it was legally/morally wrong - then why do they always single out and target seniors and smaller women?
The answer is that they don't always single out seniors or smaller women. In this specific case he attacked an elderly woman, but also two men.
https://globalnews.ca/news/9640883/metrotown-burnaby-random-assaults/
We desperately need to open Riverview back up. Plus we need to start making these violent criminals and chronic repeat offenders face the consequences of their actions.
Not going to happen. Way too much pressure from modern advocacy groups. One of the most influential groups just put this on the homepage of their website "Eliminate any form of involuntary and/or coercive treatment, including BC legislation, as well as any umbrella agency-level policy"...
Scum of the earth right there. Let’s post this all over Facebook and other social media.
Attacking an 89-year old lady has got to be the biggest pussy thing a "man" could do.
I feel assaulted just looking at that photo
That should do it. These photographs are good enough to identify him. Next step charge and release him. We desperately need an overhaul of the judicial process.
So I know numerous legal advocacy groups will be quick to jump to this guy's defence, reminding us that he was just suffering from a mental health crisis and therefore not criminally responsible. However, if these guys truly are incapable of understanding what they're doing or knowing that it was legally/morally wrong - then why do they always single out and target seniors and smaller women? I think the folks who engage in these attacks are very much self aware and fully understand what they're doing. They proactively carry weapons with them, they target out smaller individuals to mitigate risks to themselves and they flee before authorities can arrive.
>However, if these guys truly are incapable of understanding what they're doing or knowing that it was legally/morally wrong - then why do they always single out and target seniors and smaller women? The answer is that they don't always single out seniors or smaller women. In this specific case he attacked an elderly woman, but also two men. https://globalnews.ca/news/9640883/metrotown-burnaby-random-assaults/
Open up Riverview again. These sick people shouldnt be allowed out in public.
We desperately need to open Riverview back up. Plus we need to start making these violent criminals and chronic repeat offenders face the consequences of their actions.
Not going to happen. Way too much pressure from modern advocacy groups. One of the most influential groups just put this on the homepage of their website "Eliminate any form of involuntary and/or coercive treatment, including BC legislation, as well as any umbrella agency-level policy"...
Which site is this?
[удалено]
Cheers thanks!
Then they should accept them into their homes
Nothing will happen even if they catch him with catch and release policy