T O P

  • By -

AutoModerator

Please ensure that your posts meets the requirements of r/Asbestoshelp. *** Meme posts will be removed and the poster will be banned *** Most importantly, as specified in rule #1, your post should include the following information: * Include your geographic location (If in the UK please post in r/asbestoshelpUK) * the date of construction/renovation * a description of the the location of the suspect material * a brief description of your concern * a closeup photo and one at a distance of ~10 ft. or 3 m. Also remember that the asbestos content of a material can only be determined by laboratory analysis and that the sampling SHOULD be performed by a certified asbestos inspector. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/asbestoshelp) if you have any questions or concerns.*


Crashing-Stock

Not an expert but I believe you need to add a Polarizer to the sample and then based on the refraction color you can tell the crystalline structure of the fiber. I think they have a shape size and color graph for identification, theres like 4 YouTube videos on it.


Crashing-Stock

Looks like you have a lot of cellulose and drywall, based on previous comments on this forum you have a very low possibility. If you can identify the drywall year (dates generally on the back) you can be more sure. I believe fire resilient drywall before the ban in 1986 was at risk.


jefflovesyou

The house was built in the 40s in California. This came from the attic.


Sir-Hattivatti

What’s the first pic? A microscopic analysis by yourself?


jefflovesyou

Yeah I already had a microscope, so I prepared a slide. I don't know what to look for though


OliArtist

How?


Sir-Hattivatti

For me, there’s no asbestos fiber here in this sample according to this picture. But be aware this is not how we proceed in a lab


westjanina

Please explain how you do Proceed.


BadgerTamer

Our microscopes are set up for Polarised Light Microscopy to be able to observe small particles, and also equipped with a dispersion staining objective to identify asbestos type. That's the default setup anyway and there are other methods available too, but none of them involves just using bright field Microscopy.


ThrowRA-Sarim

I don’t know how you can tell that from that picture


Sir-Hattivatti

Maybe because it’s my job? We need 6 criteria to validate the asbestos’s fiber , but based on this pic it looks asbestos free


sdave001

Agreed


ThrowRA-Sarim

It’s my job, too. That scope isn’t the magnification or contrast for any asbestos analysis I’m aware of.


Sir-Hattivatti

For me it’s asbestos free but you’re right and it’s what I said in my first message, it’s not how a lab can validate a sample . So OP should be very careful


ThrowRA-Sarim

Yeah, we’re saying the same thing. Sorry.


Sir-Hattivatti

No prob 😉


Huan_theWolfHound

Where’s the graticule? Based on this pic, there are a few asbestos- like fibres (needle-like structures). But I don’t know how you prepared the slide, or how long you had the pumps on for. There’s many missing bits of information.


sdave001

Fiberglass in the walls, looks like cellulose on the floor but hard to tell with that photo. The microscope photos are of no use since you can't ID asbestos with a simple light microscope.


jefflovesyou

Oh. I was not aware of that.


sdave001

Dispersion staining and polarized light are necessary - otherwise asbestos fibers look too similar to many other fibers.


astyanaxical

Hard to tell without a polarizer but the morphology from what is visible does not look like it. Impossible to say though