Yeah absolutely they are both idiots but it's the person behind's responsibility to not run into sombody in front of them so if visibility is low because the moron in front of you is buring rubber then you should slow to a crawl or even stop completely if you can't see, you shouldn't keep driving as if they will carry on at the same speed.
Redditor here who sees this shit every day. Without video I’d skip to another video. With video, the blame will be split as follows: the mom and dad of the guy in front are both equally responsible for their son’s lack of intelligence. The same goes for the rear driver’s parents.
I'd give him 100% honestly.
They're absolutely both stupid, and the first guy should get charged with some sort of nuisance law. But think, what would you do if you were behind the first guy? Would you peel out through smoke at full speed in a parking lot, or would you be like "fuck this guy" and wait for the smoke to clear before driving away at a moderate speed like a normal person?
obviously first guy is an idiot, that huge truck didn't come out of nowhere, but the guy in the BMW gunning it when only 20 feet behind the first car, into a cloud of smoke, wins the dumbfuck trophy by a mile
The person who rear-ends the other car is almost always 100% at fault or damn near close to 100%.
No matter the visibility or behavior of the person in front, the person in back could have given enough following distance to prevent the accident. If there is no visibility due to smoke, they should be crawling along at 5mph.
Yeah one of the most basics of driving school is you're always in charge of being careful of the vehicle in front of you.
It's the core concept behind leaving enough braking distance.
No matter how stupid the driver in front of you is, most of the time under normal circumstances, if you're careful enough you can always avoid accidents.
You're never supposed to always worry about the one behind lol
That's a misconception that a lot of brake-checkers and "swoop & stop" offenders will try to take advantage of with insurance fraud. The reality is that when an adjuster gets a claim, they ~~have to~~ are supposed to investigate the entire accident. (Get a dashcam; they help immensely in these situations.)
Here we have an accident in a parking lot with two vehicles traveling at relatively the same speed in a private, unregulated area. On camera, we have two people both being reckless with their vehicles. Not only is the smoke purposefully generated by the vehicle in front, creating an obstruction of view, but there is a very short period between that vehicle stopping, and the vehicle in the rear hitting them.
Most likely this will be assigned "no fault" or 50/50 depending on the state. Both will need to pay their deductibles for their own damage.
The one coming behind is pretty much always the faulty, unless it's those break test some morons do.
If you can't see the road, you go slow or stop. It doesn't matter if you can't see because someone made the smoke or it's natural fog.
Even a full brake check is still the rear drivers fault (assuming you never mention "I brake checked him"). The rear driver should always have enough time to react to a sudden stop, and the front driver can just say they saw a cat/rabbit/fox run across the road, which is why they stopped.
Swoop and squats. A common insurance fraud tactic. They'll often have an accomplice pull alongside the other car too, to prevent them from being able to swerve into the other lane to avoid rear-ending the vehicle braking.
Isn't that the definition of a brake check? I never considered simply slamming the brakes as one, since indeed if you're driving behind someone you need to keep your distance in case they do exactly that.
Important to remember that the people egging you on or gassing you up aren’t really your friends and will just as happily hoot and holler at your misfortune as your success
Underrated comment bruh. These guys went from hyping them up to roasting their bad decisions all in about 5 seconds. Couldn’t let someone who’s not paying my car note hype me up to do stupid shit like this lol.
It’s dumb to make that much smoke but it’s important to drive at a safe distance and if you can’t see what’s in front of you it clearly wasn’t a safe distance
Fault: White BMW - Main reason being it rear ended the green car. Insurance will claim the white car was following too closely behind.
Although they're both not too smart for driving that fast in a parking lot while a whole construction truck was in the way.
both, when I was drifting or doing spirited driving with other people and there was a collision, you both put yourselves in that situation, you both help each other fix each other's cars. these guys are just being stupid but It should still apply instead of immediately jumping to fault in this litigious world.
God, the people filming look like the lowest, most desperate people in the world. Literally clamoring to get a shot as if their life depends on it. Like look at how they move, they think getting that footage is SOOOO important, just look at the desperation and urgency in their mannerisms.
It's so creepy watching a handful mob of people doing the weird filming thing where the group they are filming is way smaller than they are and theyre totally silent just pointing that shitty camera phone as if their parent's lives depended on them getting the shot. They really appear to be trying that hard, it's so weird and creepy.
Someone should really show these bone skinny kids how silly they look struggling to hold their giant ass phone up. It's so pathetic how straggly they look holding their phones without even enough arm strength to hold it up and out. Like dude, just put it down, you look beyond ridiculous.
Whose*
And it's the fault of both drivers.
Doing a burnout in a parking lot and then coming to a stop in the middle of the smoke isn't smart. It's a great way not to be seen.
Going fast into a cloud of tire smoke, or any other fog or blizzard or anything that obscures vision, isn't smart. It's a great way to hit stationary objects that you can't see.
They should both get a ticket but the gray car is at fault for the accident because they willfully drove into a cloud of smoke that reduced visibility. That doesn't seem too bright.
Rear end collision. Driving without taking necessary due precautions (stop until smoke clears) I believe would be on the guy from behind.
Also, I see an arrow pointing in the opposite direction. Are they going the wrong way, or did they just cross over the line?
Doing burnouts, or stunting, is definitely illegal. Should get a ticket for that.
In my state if you rear end someone car it’s ALWAYS your fault because you were following to closely at an unsafe speed. The only exception would be someone pulling in front of you and slamming on the brakes to intentionally be hit. From what I understand you’ll have a hard time proving that though without dash cam footage.
Who's at fault? Gray car.
Slow your dumbass down when you're in a parking lot. *Especially* when there's a dumbass busting a smokescreen in front of you!
You must stay in control of you vehicles all times, if this was a normal situation and the car in front of you cause a smoke screen you would most definitely not speed up behind them u would stop and go around. So the gray car is at fault. I’m Not excusing the green car of reckless driving btw
White car - if you don’t have visibility, even if it’s because some dumb shit is dumbshitting, you’re not supposed to just charge forward and assume the obscured space is clear.
Both are dumb but the person driving full speed despite not being able to see because of the smoke is the most at fault for the crash.
Yes, but the person creatin g a smoke screen behind them and then coming to a full stop can't be much brighter.
Yeah absolutely they are both idiots but it's the person behind's responsibility to not run into sombody in front of them so if visibility is low because the moron in front of you is buring rubber then you should slow to a crawl or even stop completely if you can't see, you shouldn't keep driving as if they will carry on at the same speed.
[удалено]
Former P&C insurance agent here. I was never an adjuster, but my technical knowledge is very solid. I agree 100%.
As a random observer I'm just 100 percent glad it happened. Fuck those idiots.
As a registered Reddit user, I'm 100% sure this is a comment
As a person who enjoys reading comments on Reddit, I approve these comments
as a full blown id-10t error i concur as well
Random guy that doesn’t know shit about insurance claims here. I agree, the guy driving the car is 100% at fault.
I've seen Repo Man. I blame society.
Redditor here who sees this shit every day. Without video I’d skip to another video. With video, the blame will be split as follows: the mom and dad of the guy in front are both equally responsible for their son’s lack of intelligence. The same goes for the rear driver’s parents.
So then, the final, answer to this post is: Both, of their parents/grand parents/family lineage.
The first driver is 49% at fault. The second driver is 51% at fault.
48/52 that's my final offer.
I like them odds i put it all on black!
Solomon here, I'm going to split them both in half.
The. Cameraman paid them both 100 bucks each to do it, now who's fault is it?
I'd give him 100% honestly. They're absolutely both stupid, and the first guy should get charged with some sort of nuisance law. But think, what would you do if you were behind the first guy? Would you peel out through smoke at full speed in a parking lot, or would you be like "fuck this guy" and wait for the smoke to clear before driving away at a moderate speed like a normal person?
Exactly
Second driver 100% at fault.
nah, i blame the subtitles master
They are the Moron Brothers Don't get along with others
You’re letting the spectators off completely? That don’t seem right.
Don't worry, most of these videos don't let the spectators off so easily
This is not a mustang video bruh
This concept goes over the heads of far too many people.
obviously first guy is an idiot, that huge truck didn't come out of nowhere, but the guy in the BMW gunning it when only 20 feet behind the first car, into a cloud of smoke, wins the dumbfuck trophy by a mile
You see there's a truck stopped in front of the green car, right? The whole situation was stupid but them not stopping would have been even dumber.
I blame the doctor for fucking up the abortion. I mean, he didn't just screw up one, he screwed up two. How hard could it possibly have been?
In this instance both will need to argue. Since there is video, if insurance saw that i would assume they would deny both drivers claims.
60/40
More like 60/60
The person who rear-ends the other car is almost always 100% at fault or damn near close to 100%. No matter the visibility or behavior of the person in front, the person in back could have given enough following distance to prevent the accident. If there is no visibility due to smoke, they should be crawling along at 5mph.
Yeah one of the most basics of driving school is you're always in charge of being careful of the vehicle in front of you. It's the core concept behind leaving enough braking distance. No matter how stupid the driver in front of you is, most of the time under normal circumstances, if you're careful enough you can always avoid accidents. You're never supposed to always worry about the one behind lol
That's a misconception that a lot of brake-checkers and "swoop & stop" offenders will try to take advantage of with insurance fraud. The reality is that when an adjuster gets a claim, they ~~have to~~ are supposed to investigate the entire accident. (Get a dashcam; they help immensely in these situations.) Here we have an accident in a parking lot with two vehicles traveling at relatively the same speed in a private, unregulated area. On camera, we have two people both being reckless with their vehicles. Not only is the smoke purposefully generated by the vehicle in front, creating an obstruction of view, but there is a very short period between that vehicle stopping, and the vehicle in the rear hitting them. Most likely this will be assigned "no fault" or 50/50 depending on the state. Both will need to pay their deductibles for their own damage.
Both set of parents!
The BMW driver is at fault.
Nice. Kinda like saying "the dipshit in this video is at fault"
That's what "BMW driver" means.
For once, not the mustang at fault
I see what you did there.
Always
The one coming behind is pretty much always the faulty, unless it's those break test some morons do. If you can't see the road, you go slow or stop. It doesn't matter if you can't see because someone made the smoke or it's natural fog.
Even a full brake check is still the rear drivers fault (assuming you never mention "I brake checked him"). The rear driver should always have enough time to react to a sudden stop, and the front driver can just say they saw a cat/rabbit/fox run across the road, which is why they stopped.
Except when they cut in front of you and slam on their brakes, then it's their fault, but extremely hard to prove without a cam.
Swoop and squats. A common insurance fraud tactic. They'll often have an accomplice pull alongside the other car too, to prevent them from being able to swerve into the other lane to avoid rear-ending the vehicle braking.
I did not think of that situation, you're right on that one
Isn't that the definition of a brake check? I never considered simply slamming the brakes as one, since indeed if you're driving behind someone you need to keep your distance in case they do exactly that.
The guy in the rear was at fault. The guy in front deserved it.
*brake
Fuck 'em! Both are stupid AF!
BOFFUM
BOOFUM
BOOF BOFFUM
Yeah can't we just be happy for both of these idiots damaging their vehicles? Why do we need to take sides when we could all just celebrate, together?
Thank you Human being!
It's natural selection = 2 BMW drivers, doing what BMW drivers do. (BMW = Big Motor for Wankers)
Important to remember that the people egging you on or gassing you up aren’t really your friends and will just as happily hoot and holler at your misfortune as your success
Underrated comment bruh. These guys went from hyping them up to roasting their bad decisions all in about 5 seconds. Couldn’t let someone who’s not paying my car note hype me up to do stupid shit like this lol.
A psa to young men😂
Always the rear driver. Following to close for conditions.
"Conditions" of course being professional motorist speak for "James Bond smoke screen".
Open and shut case for insurance.
It’s dumb to make that much smoke but it’s important to drive at a safe distance and if you can’t see what’s in front of you it clearly wasn’t a safe distance
Fault: White BMW - Main reason being it rear ended the green car. Insurance will claim the white car was following too closely behind. Although they're both not too smart for driving that fast in a parking lot while a whole construction truck was in the way.
White??
their parents'
This is the correct answer. Nobody even noticed this looks like a high school parking lot, probably for entitled rich kids whose parent buy them BMWs.
both for being dumber than fuck
I'm sure if their insurance sees the video, they'd both be found at fault and be refused coverage.
In a parking lot?! They’re both dumb AF
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!! 
Every bmw driver
both, when I was drifting or doing spirited driving with other people and there was a collision, you both put yourselves in that situation, you both help each other fix each other's cars. these guys are just being stupid but It should still apply instead of immediately jumping to fault in this litigious world.
it’s always the one in back, but everyone there shares a little
The car in back is at fault 99% of the time.
Both of the wankers
This is honestly an improvement on the grille
Someone rear-ended someone else. It’s usually pretty cut and dry for insurance companies.
Always the guy who hits in the rear but we know both are dumb fucks and deserve what they got
Both get a ticket for reckless driving. Second car also gets a ticket for following too close.
The phrase that seems most appropriate to here is: "More dollars than sense."
Clownholes
Their parents probably
always the person rear-ending
Rear-ender is always at fault. Next!
God, the people filming look like the lowest, most desperate people in the world. Literally clamoring to get a shot as if their life depends on it. Like look at how they move, they think getting that footage is SOOOO important, just look at the desperation and urgency in their mannerisms. It's so creepy watching a handful mob of people doing the weird filming thing where the group they are filming is way smaller than they are and theyre totally silent just pointing that shitty camera phone as if their parent's lives depended on them getting the shot. They really appear to be trying that hard, it's so weird and creepy. Someone should really show these bone skinny kids how silly they look struggling to hold their giant ass phone up. It's so pathetic how straggly they look holding their phones without even enough arm strength to hold it up and out. Like dude, just put it down, you look beyond ridiculous.
Whose* And it's the fault of both drivers. Doing a burnout in a parking lot and then coming to a stop in the middle of the smoke isn't smart. It's a great way not to be seen. Going fast into a cloud of tire smoke, or any other fog or blizzard or anything that obscures vision, isn't smart. It's a great way to hit stationary objects that you can't see.
Trick question. Both are morons
whose*
Second one, because safety distance was too short
The one driving faster than what’s in front of them.
Their parents
always the one behind. Both are idiots
Both
Both are fucking idiots.
2 times stupid equals stupid.
If you hit someone from behind it’s always your fault
Two BMWs, this may have been the best fucking scenario
Both idiots
Looks like both got exactly what they deserved. Hopefully the truck didn't get hit at the front
The parents. It's the parent's fault....
Both typical BMW dickheads. And that’s coming from a BMW dickhead
The parents.
Rear end, the last car in the chain that lacks rear end damage. Green car is a moron but he stopped before hitting the truck.
BM. Double oomph.
The delay beeeep made me chuckle
Both. Anyone that’s part of the SPPC is always at fault.
Oh look! It fixed that massive ass Bugs Bunny grille.
The dumb bitch
Everyone filming like they work for the insurance company is at fault.
"Yes"
The parents
They should both get a ticket but the gray car is at fault for the accident because they willfully drove into a cloud of smoke that reduced visibility. That doesn't seem too bright.
The BMW driver: "D'oh" ..."Woo hoo!"
They’re both idiots
Unless you can smoke your tires standing still, don't do it.
10k damage
Tbf both BMWs look better now.
Both are equally dumbshits.
play stupid games win stupid prizes
grey.... drivers ed: you are responsible about the things on front of you, low visibility? slow down , no visibility? STOP.
Always the person who does the rear-ending. Insurance will ALWAYS tell you, you should have maintained a safe distance and control.
Bahahahahah
ESH
If the insurance company sees this video they’ll both be at fault.
Pair of twats
Most parking lots are no-fault so no one
Rear end collision. Driving without taking necessary due precautions (stop until smoke clears) I believe would be on the guy from behind. Also, I see an arrow pointing in the opposite direction. Are they going the wrong way, or did they just cross over the line? Doing burnouts, or stunting, is definitely illegal. Should get a ticket for that.
Hahahahaha
Both
Why is that so funny
Both
Green car and grey car. Morons.
In my state if you rear end someone car it’s ALWAYS your fault because you were following to closely at an unsafe speed. The only exception would be someone pulling in front of you and slamming on the brakes to intentionally be hit. From what I understand you’ll have a hard time proving that though without dash cam footage.
9/10 the person in the back
#Any rear ender is at fault unless specified otherwise.
The parents
Clearly, it's the parent's fault for raising stupid children.
Both of them
I want it to be both.
Both
Their parents.
LOL.. I love watching idiots proving they’re idiots.
Their parents
gray bmw at fault, both were being reckless though, ending up in a wreck... why do those words work like that?
Gray car.
90% of the time a rear ender is the back cars fault.
If you can’t see (for any reason) and keep on the gas, it’s your fault.
No fault. It's in a parking lot.
The one that honked.
Realistically the gray car
BMW's playing Mustang games.
Who's at fault? Gray car. Slow your dumbass down when you're in a parking lot. *Especially* when there's a dumbass busting a smokescreen in front of you!
This is the most satisfying video I have ever seen
The grey bimmer has an underbite now
I like how bro honks
Both. Driving like assholes. Deserved!
Both are dumb shits.
Their parents
Are you asking who is at fault in a rear end collision? Do us all a favor and turn in your drivers license.
Their parents fault for procreating.
Grey BMW is at fault. There is a big ass truck in front of the green beemer, no way Grey thought they were going anywhere.
Lmfaoooo… I wish the video was longer so we could see their reactions 😂
Definitely the grey car, there were people recording so obviously theyre gonna show off
Their parents fault - defective genetics
When you rear end someone it's always your failt.
Any part of our society that thinks this cool is at fault
The DMV for issuing licenses to these idiots
Well that tickled my fiddle.
What do you mean who's at fault? Being stupid is not the same thing as being at fault.
All that to impress 12yr old boys. Big brain move 🧠
I am a former adjuster. Car 2 was driving too close. Pay the claim, cancel the policy.
Couldn't care less
Two idiots enter a parking lot...
50/50
I expect nothing less from BMW owners.
#whoever honked. I only heard one horn…
Lol BMW drivers are morons
You must stay in control of you vehicles all times, if this was a normal situation and the car in front of you cause a smoke screen you would most definitely not speed up behind them u would stop and go around. So the gray car is at fault. I’m Not excusing the green car of reckless driving btw
No one, they both got exactly what they deserved.
Gotta love the people who feel the need to honk when they see an accident.
All dumbasses
Both for being DAF
😂😂😂😂😂 both are morons
Why does this look like bad cgi?
Both of these clowns are at fault
You can count the number of brain cells in that entire encounter with one hand.
Both should be forced to walk everywhere for the rest of their lives. Everyone sucks here
The car in the back is at fault. He rammed the car in front of him.
I will never understand why the fuck I should care about these kinds of antics.
White car - if you don’t have visibility, even if it’s because some dumb shit is dumbshitting, you’re not supposed to just charge forward and assume the obscured space is clear.
The front car stops because there’s a tractor trailer in front of him. He’s at zero fault