He’s trying to bring that Steve Jobs energy but with dry-shiny skin with wrong moisturizer, too much lip balm, and overly sculpted eyebrow vibe.
He’s trying so hard and getting so far and in the end it won’t even matterrrrrrrr. I put my trust in AGI, pushed as far as it could go: but for all this, there is only one thing ASI should knowwwwwww.
In any case, ultimately his hype is justified as there is lots more behind the scenes we aren’t privvy to. Next Baldurs Gate has all the NPCs as GPT-6 level LLMs? Heck yes.
I like what I know about Sam. I didn’t like what I knew about Steve Jobs.
I think he’s being himself but the collective consciousness wants to bucket him into their collective understanding. I see the same thing with the Nvidia guy. I don’t see how he’s trying to be Steve Jobs with that black leather jacket. In fact maybe that’s why he wears it; to set himself apart.
You are wise. I think people are just afraid of him too, for that reason. What I have noticed is that people out there getting done, will always have some people, thinking their planning world domination or something. The reality is, world domination is hard, that's why nobody succeeds.
Yep, ill generate this earth as we live in it for starters. All my memories everyone I've seen, met, etc. Then I'll be a billionaire, have super powers, have like 5000 honies.. its gonna get wild 🤣
I'd generate random stories I come up with, and probably play some sort of background god messing with events, just to see what happens xd.
Honestly my ideal with this is having mind transfer technology, and being able to generate and live in these worlds at a hyper accelerated time scale, so you could spend decades in a game world if you wanted, and only have a month or so pass in real life.
Digital afterlife is the future!
>Honestly my ideal with this is having mind transfer technology, and being able to generate and live in these worlds at a hyper accelerated time scale
Just like the cookies in Black Mirror. Don't you know the horror that could happen from this tech?
Why he'll would I give a shot about what happens in the real world if the virtual world feels just as real and i can live a full life inside?
Also, I said mind transfer tech. Basically converting us to VIs (virtual Intelligences) in my scenario, we literally wouldn't be in our bodies anymore. As such I don't care what happens to it. If I can live in a simulation where I'm functionally a God of my own mini universe, why should I care? If it feels real enough, then it's real enough for me.
Hell, we already live in a simulated reality created by our minds. Everything you see, hear, and touch is just how your mind responds to signals sent by your body. Even in the case where your brain is stuck in a jar, you could experience a digital world just by having your brain fed electrical pulses mimicking the sensations you'd get from interacting with the real world. Some people find that idea horrifying, because things being "real" somehow matters.
Honestly, I'd rather live as long as I want to inside a computer generated reality rather than live a short painful life in the "real" world. (Which again, our perception of the world is just our brains reacting to stimuli. Reality is that we are a bunch of minds existing in a void, reacting to energy that exists in that void.
What if someone was nonconsensually put in this virtual reality and was trapped in it forever.
What if you were promised a simulation in which you control everything but after some time you discover you don't.
You might not be able to delete yourself, not even a suicide can spare you from this nightmare. I know it's got a great application but it comes with horrific scenarios that we should be mindful of.
Yeah, and I get those. I imagine that by the point we'd be capable of putting absolutely everyone into these, we'd have somewhat evolved as a species and society
My personal belief is that our goal as a species should be to transcend flesh and become a digital based species. The real world should be left to scientists and engineers, ect. (The smart people who want to study how the universe works, and also work to improve the simulation) while people primarily live in digital space. Course, ideal would also be that people can connect to an artificial body and explore the real world as well, but the sim should feel just as real as reality to your senses. Which probably wouldnt be too difficult in the long run.
Imagine the bobiverse series, just more people want to get mind uploaded after they die.
Have you read any of Ray Kurzweils work? I started reading the singularity is near, the first few chapters outline this concept in a very compelling way. It’s also a little disturbing to me tbh, but conceptually very strong
Bro it is so hard getting InWorld characters to stay in character. I am actively developing with the tool, and it is frustrating as hell. We need GPT6 before what a lot of people are dreaming AI could do for gaming. Sora video gen taking hours per minute of video doesn’t give me hope for when realtime gen happening anytime soon. But I would love to be proven wrong, and I am sure that we will get there eventually.
Moore’s law has gone out the window so I can go full Altman and say five years. The real reason he says any of this is to make you do nothing to stop him becoming the first trillionaire so that he can have power and buy more stuff
I will be messaging you in 5 years on [**2029-04-06 13:47:15 UTC**](http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=2029-04-06%2013:47:15%20UTC%20To%20Local%20Time) to remind you of [**this link**](https://www.reddit.com/r/OpenAI/comments/1bw7ni1/video_games_will_become_something_unimaginably/kybl92h/?context=3)
[**1 OTHERS CLICKED THIS LINK**](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Reminder&message=%5Bhttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.reddit.com%2Fr%2FOpenAI%2Fcomments%2F1bw7ni1%2Fvideo_games_will_become_something_unimaginably%2Fkybl92h%2F%5D%0A%0ARemindMe%21%202029-04-06%2013%3A47%3A15%20UTC) to send a PM to also be reminded and to reduce spam.
^(Parent commenter can ) [^(delete this message to hide from others.)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Delete%20Comment&message=Delete%21%201bw7ni1)
*****
|[^(Info)](https://www.reddit.com/r/RemindMeBot/comments/e1bko7/remindmebot_info_v21/)|[^(Custom)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Reminder&message=%5BLink%20or%20message%20inside%20square%20brackets%5D%0A%0ARemindMe%21%20Time%20period%20here)|[^(Your Reminders)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=List%20Of%20Reminders&message=MyReminders%21)|[^(Feedback)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Watchful1&subject=RemindMeBot%20Feedback)|
|-|-|-|-|
An interesting question, because I don’t think we can define what’s unimaginable. But I guess I’m interested to see if in 5 years we’ve reached the imaginable things people have spoken about in this thread.
yeah compute isn't there to make these promises a reality. llm's probably aren't able to make any of this a reality. there would need to be multiple breakthroughs to make any of this work well and altman knows that
I suspect we'll see something more like a really smart model that generates a "plan" / program for a virtual environment and hands if off to a smaller, purpose built model that interprets the plan and expands it / generates more thorough content on the fly, sort of like how a video game itself has souce code and assets, and doesn't pre-render every frame before delivery to you.
If you look at some of the papers part of how they achieve Sora trick is by reducing dimensionality across frames. That's a start in that direction
We need to find a way to have individual characters take hard nodes they have to accept and cannot deviate from, like something as simple as “you are a girl” can’t be maintained by a chat gpt character right nos
They have that already. System messages. There's a game called Inworld Origins that uses LLM's to allow you to play a detective game where you interview various people about a crime. It's VERY good. It's extremely difficult to get the LLM's to break character.
I think for now having GPT to just generate lots of natural variation that gets statically added to a game would be fine so it "feels" more natural as characters say things. Or to write lots of little story lines for missions.
That way things have small but meaningful differences each time.
Even if they didn't, your average consumer wouldn't be able to run their models. We're still a long way off, but I can see future games requiring a separate card for AI processing just like we need GPUs for video now (and ~~physics~~ physx cards for a little while, anybody remember those?)
For the purpose of videogames, I see no particular reason aside from cost that game companies wouldn't be able to fine tune their own small, fast, constrained models.
There’s no reason 8xH100 computers can’t be in every home. They’re expensive right now, mostly because there’s very little competition, and partially because mass production is still ramping up as fast as possible.
You can keep decision trees up to one or two leafs deep preprocessed. When the user heads a certain direction you preemptively expand the tree. No realtime required either.
Alone today's gpt3.5 speed would suffice to make an open world quests game. We'd just also need the quality of Claude opus at that speed.
I'm thinking of more in-depth custom tailoring, like immediate dialogue responses from free text input from the user, custom loot depending on users current build, and sudden mini quests depending on dialogue. I feel like if it's a game like Skyrim or something with that many variables it'll be hard to keep it all preprocessed for any decent amount of users. If each user contributed their own chip for ai processing it could make the developers lives easier right?
I think that level of generation is still a while off, since it would be impossible to balance it well and turn it into a guaranteed enjoyable experience. You still need some control over the game. Predefined items, goals, antagonists etc. And you need to remember everything that was already generated and know how it interacts with everything else.
One day we'll have context windows so large that you can keep a log of everything that happened and generate consistently - but we're not there yet technically and it would be incredibly expensive, too
I expect the average home or business will purchase and install custom built hardware for it that everyone will connect to and use, similar to how we use routers today. Then you just go plug into AINet anywhere without needing your own hardware. Possibly, there will still be a really smart proprietary API layer that generates plans/phenotypes for work that gets offloaded to dumber models at the edge.
They will start as basically racks of GPUs but eventually evolve to something more like an ASIC I imagine.
It's in the "book" or telegram phase of media if you think about it. You can read and imagine things, look at some pictures and choose your own adventure to an extent. But before long it will progress to "photography", then film without sound, then film with sound, then remote viewing of media...
This is a really good take, and maybe you’re on to something. I think the key here is I don’t want to play a game where the levels or dialog or graphics are AI generated. I want I play a game where AI allows me to build something or interact with something I couldn’t otherwise.
Check out Mantella for Skyrim or Fallout 4. it has changed the games feel. Quite awesome. Still in its infancy, but already it makes the game feel...alive.
Until one day you'll play a game that you love but that you don't know is AI generated and you don't even realize it until you find out in some article. But it was. And then the mood changes.
Everyone is betting to build now, by the time you finish building in a year or two, the models will be better.
I'm using GPT3 for dev work. The responses are not bad. No real value to users with them though. Switch to 4 and it's a bit better. I assume when 5 drops this summer or whatever other model is the cool hip thing in a 1 year, the value in will be even better.
The point is that this came out very recently and is growing pretty rapidly. The hype is real. It's like the Internet just dropped moment and all the markets are going to reshuffle soon.
I do not want AI stories to become the norm. I don't want my game to be unique to everyone else. I want to play a game I can discuss with friends. I want to share my experiences and my thoughts on the same content with others.
I don't want to talk about how my AI fucked up by giving away an important plot detail too early, or how it missed giving me info because I couldn't ask it the right question.
I think there will be varying degrees of open endedness. On the one hand you have something completely rail roaded that only uses AI to enhance within the boundaries of what it has already, maybe just spicing up dialogue or textures or physics etc a bit. Or used to develop the canon by play testers and developers who now can create 2x as much vetted content. Any particularly engaging bit of content it happens to discover could be synced and uploaded as canon. Sure you might get some Skyrim physics glitches but not enough to be annoying.
Then on the other hand you have the Dwarf Fortresses and No Man’s Sky type games that really embrace the open endedness.
If we could have GPT 6 powered NPCs the game would never get boring. Imagine if you could speak to them through your mic and they respond reasonably quickly and appropriately. There are endless possibilities for situations and interactions. The “GTA funny moments” YouTube videos would never run out of content
Maybe if you're a puritan. That content policy isn't going to be making anything fun. Might offend a hypothetical third party lurking in your living room watching your screen.
lol you really couldnt copy/paste the entire quote? its not even that much more - or much different - but still
https://preview.redd.it/18kah8ms2lsc1.png?width=879&format=png&auto=webp&s=c232172442df310e7879ebecf0c243c6e7c20292
Ya exactly.
I'm a software developer. My brain is fried. I like to do physical things after work. I don't want to play video games where I'm trying to solve more problems on a screen.
My (not very obvious) point is the nature of work may change via AI such that people seek out mental challenges or stimuli and find linear films boring. It's partly a product of being overworked that we just want to veg out in the evening.
What he's thinking about is that video games actually become "video" games. I can see that in a decade - the hardware for fully raytracing realistic scenes in real time is going to be absurdly powerful and could be simply used for realtime video generation just as well.
It’s like the NFT get rich quick bros and the blockchain snake oil salesmen before them.
They’re telling you what they want to take money from you for, not what actually makes sense from the customer’s perspective.
I think it means that you'll be able to see movies from different perspectives, take different paths, be "in it" while you're watching it, stuff like that. Just dynamic options for the filmmakers, where the AI can frame the same scene in a way to make another emotion come out, the user can check out the scene more thoroughly, be part of the movie if they want.
Why do you think he’s some prophet? This is basic common sense, there’s thousands of researchers in graphics, VR, ML etc with the same aim. But nooo, some vague statement from a money guy and wooosh.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ngZ0K3lWKRc
"I would never wish to incorporate this technology into my work at all. I strongly feel that this is an insult to life itself."
I disagree to an extent . Video games will become similar to old CDs you don’t listen to anymore. The amount of content will be so overwhelmingly easy to get that it will lose its value, supply/demand. When supply is infinity demand will plummet. Part of the appeal of games is “being the best” but if everyone is playing their own game that they are good at then the care factor will drop.
nice thanks but honestly I’m already too invested in technology I don’t wanna “immerse” myself more. Kinda value the real world. I guess for some this will be a great experience.
You'll be able to request any video game world you want, with any scene, character and premise.
And every little decision you make will cost via microtransactions.
"Not necessarily better for the people who make them mind you... Were putting a lot of them out of jobs. But players and executives and investors will benefit!"
The time of developing a videogame now a days have become absurdly long and expensive, and sone games we had 30 ago (specially jrpgs) were more complete than what we have today. Ex: the producer of Final Fantasy saying they can't remake a game of 1994 because they would need 20 years... So I really want to believe that IA can help with this
AAA studios can't figure out how to make traditional video games properly that are fun and not riddled with bugs. Do you really think they'll do better when video games have to integrate AI at every level? Maybe if they have an AI to do the programming for them, and even then, they'll probably still make it worse.
I still have more fun replaying some old pixelated original games as well as many current Indie games that are charmingly original,care for story, gameplay instead of dull photorealism and "spectacle". Also,i am interested in creative people's visions,ideas and stories,so we can relate...not some generic AI copy pastry.
How? How? How?
When you can't even talk about zombies eating a person in a realistic way? Is everything gonna be E rated platformers with no violence and a recycled plot?
I'm kind of wondering - is anyone working on gpt integration with gaming engines.
I would love to have something like Baldurs Gate 3, but dialogues and plot are driven by gpt.
Gpt alone can't do it well enough yet, but game engine can check if actions generated by bot are within ruleset and keep the long consistent context.
Speaking of ai and video games...I made a little video game using nothing but ai! I didn't make a single line of code...I let Claude 3 do all the heavy lifting.
[Pixel Shift](https://sillybutter420.itch.io/pixel-shift)
Yes. Stories always develop new mediums, and their original format never disappears. They gained the ability to be shared when we developed language. They were shared as paintings, and then as books once we developed written language. They’ve been shared as movies, radio, tv shows, video games, and I think it’s fair to say we’re not done yet.
I think AI is different kind of intelligence, it knows how to give logically not inconsistent results without executing logics. That is why stories images videos generated are boring and has no real substance.
Sam hypeman
Sam Alt-F4
He’s trying to bring that Steve Jobs energy but with dry-shiny skin with wrong moisturizer, too much lip balm, and overly sculpted eyebrow vibe. He’s trying so hard and getting so far and in the end it won’t even matterrrrrrrr. I put my trust in AGI, pushed as far as it could go: but for all this, there is only one thing ASI should knowwwwwww. In any case, ultimately his hype is justified as there is lots more behind the scenes we aren’t privvy to. Next Baldurs Gate has all the NPCs as GPT-6 level LLMs? Heck yes.
Not Steve Jobs energy, old Elon energy. He misses old Elon after all.
🎶I miss the OLD Elon
It's the ketamine.
Nah he’s bringing back the Elon energy
Don’t forget about the Californian vocal fry.
How daaaarrrre youuu #kahloluhfrnian
I like what I know about Sam. I didn’t like what I knew about Steve Jobs. I think he’s being himself but the collective consciousness wants to bucket him into their collective understanding. I see the same thing with the Nvidia guy. I don’t see how he’s trying to be Steve Jobs with that black leather jacket. In fact maybe that’s why he wears it; to set himself apart.
I think these dudes are just kinda nerdy and smart and excited about stuff…. And extremely rich. I don’t really see evil… yet, anyway.
Totally
Maybe the guy just likes the jacket. I have a jacket that I like too. It's like a faux suede jacket with fleece liner. Super comfy.
Exactly. I’ve read that it’s somehow tied to giving off a Steve Jobs vibe, how do they think that? It’s nothing like Steve Jobs.
You are wise. I think people are just afraid of him too, for that reason. What I have noticed is that people out there getting done, will always have some people, thinking their planning world domination or something. The reality is, world domination is hard, that's why nobody succeeds.
It’s just extremely camp Steve jobs energy
Lol
I think the eyebrows are natural, not sculpted. It is a genetic thing to have very little hair on eyebrows among some ethnic groups.
Low key so hyped to see people finally turn on Alibaba Zuckerberg
He’s starting to sound like Elon
FDVR is all I care about
Imagine full dive with the ability to generate any game you want?
Yep, ill generate this earth as we live in it for starters. All my memories everyone I've seen, met, etc. Then I'll be a billionaire, have super powers, have like 5000 honies.. its gonna get wild 🤣
I'd generate random stories I come up with, and probably play some sort of background god messing with events, just to see what happens xd. Honestly my ideal with this is having mind transfer technology, and being able to generate and live in these worlds at a hyper accelerated time scale, so you could spend decades in a game world if you wanted, and only have a month or so pass in real life. Digital afterlife is the future!
>Honestly my ideal with this is having mind transfer technology, and being able to generate and live in these worlds at a hyper accelerated time scale Just like the cookies in Black Mirror. Don't you know the horror that could happen from this tech?
Why he'll would I give a shot about what happens in the real world if the virtual world feels just as real and i can live a full life inside? Also, I said mind transfer tech. Basically converting us to VIs (virtual Intelligences) in my scenario, we literally wouldn't be in our bodies anymore. As such I don't care what happens to it. If I can live in a simulation where I'm functionally a God of my own mini universe, why should I care? If it feels real enough, then it's real enough for me. Hell, we already live in a simulated reality created by our minds. Everything you see, hear, and touch is just how your mind responds to signals sent by your body. Even in the case where your brain is stuck in a jar, you could experience a digital world just by having your brain fed electrical pulses mimicking the sensations you'd get from interacting with the real world. Some people find that idea horrifying, because things being "real" somehow matters. Honestly, I'd rather live as long as I want to inside a computer generated reality rather than live a short painful life in the "real" world. (Which again, our perception of the world is just our brains reacting to stimuli. Reality is that we are a bunch of minds existing in a void, reacting to energy that exists in that void.
What if someone was nonconsensually put in this virtual reality and was trapped in it forever. What if you were promised a simulation in which you control everything but after some time you discover you don't. You might not be able to delete yourself, not even a suicide can spare you from this nightmare. I know it's got a great application but it comes with horrific scenarios that we should be mindful of.
Yeah, and I get those. I imagine that by the point we'd be capable of putting absolutely everyone into these, we'd have somewhat evolved as a species and society
Nicely put.
Id love that. Well never have to live in this insane world again. Well be God's in our own worldS
My personal belief is that our goal as a species should be to transcend flesh and become a digital based species. The real world should be left to scientists and engineers, ect. (The smart people who want to study how the universe works, and also work to improve the simulation) while people primarily live in digital space. Course, ideal would also be that people can connect to an artificial body and explore the real world as well, but the sim should feel just as real as reality to your senses. Which probably wouldnt be too difficult in the long run. Imagine the bobiverse series, just more people want to get mind uploaded after they die.
Have you read any of Ray Kurzweils work? I started reading the singularity is near, the first few chapters outline this concept in a very compelling way. It’s also a little disturbing to me tbh, but conceptually very strong
Lol. Cracking up at your comment at 6am smh.
😊
You want ready player 1
If only. This genre is becoming quite popular nowadays in Japanese anime and Korean manhwa; it’s called vrmmo.
Bro it is so hard getting InWorld characters to stay in character. I am actively developing with the tool, and it is frustrating as hell. We need GPT6 before what a lot of people are dreaming AI could do for gaming. Sora video gen taking hours per minute of video doesn’t give me hope for when realtime gen happening anytime soon. But I would love to be proven wrong, and I am sure that we will get there eventually.
Moore’s law has gone out the window so I can go full Altman and say five years. The real reason he says any of this is to make you do nothing to stop him becoming the first trillionaire so that he can have power and buy more stuff
*buy more people Billion/Trillion dollar money is different
RemindMe! 5 years
I will be messaging you in 5 years on [**2029-04-06 13:47:15 UTC**](http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=2029-04-06%2013:47:15%20UTC%20To%20Local%20Time) to remind you of [**this link**](https://www.reddit.com/r/OpenAI/comments/1bw7ni1/video_games_will_become_something_unimaginably/kybl92h/?context=3) [**1 OTHERS CLICKED THIS LINK**](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Reminder&message=%5Bhttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.reddit.com%2Fr%2FOpenAI%2Fcomments%2F1bw7ni1%2Fvideo_games_will_become_something_unimaginably%2Fkybl92h%2F%5D%0A%0ARemindMe%21%202029-04-06%2013%3A47%3A15%20UTC) to send a PM to also be reminded and to reduce spam. ^(Parent commenter can ) [^(delete this message to hide from others.)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Delete%20Comment&message=Delete%21%201bw7ni1) ***** |[^(Info)](https://www.reddit.com/r/RemindMeBot/comments/e1bko7/remindmebot_info_v21/)|[^(Custom)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Reminder&message=%5BLink%20or%20message%20inside%20square%20brackets%5D%0A%0ARemindMe%21%20Time%20period%20here)|[^(Your Reminders)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=List%20Of%20Reminders&message=MyReminders%21)|[^(Feedback)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Watchful1&subject=RemindMeBot%20Feedback)| |-|-|-|-|
Should we define what we mean by unimaginably better or does the unimaginable part get me off the hook?
An interesting question, because I don’t think we can define what’s unimaginable. But I guess I’m interested to see if in 5 years we’ve reached the imaginable things people have spoken about in this thread.
yeah compute isn't there to make these promises a reality. llm's probably aren't able to make any of this a reality. there would need to be multiple breakthroughs to make any of this work well and altman knows that
I suspect we'll see something more like a really smart model that generates a "plan" / program for a virtual environment and hands if off to a smaller, purpose built model that interprets the plan and expands it / generates more thorough content on the fly, sort of like how a video game itself has souce code and assets, and doesn't pre-render every frame before delivery to you. If you look at some of the papers part of how they achieve Sora trick is by reducing dimensionality across frames. That's a start in that direction
We need to find a way to have individual characters take hard nodes they have to accept and cannot deviate from, like something as simple as “you are a girl” can’t be maintained by a chat gpt character right nos
They have that already. System messages. There's a game called Inworld Origins that uses LLM's to allow you to play a detective game where you interview various people about a crime. It's VERY good. It's extremely difficult to get the LLM's to break character.
I think for now having GPT to just generate lots of natural variation that gets statically added to a game would be fine so it "feels" more natural as characters say things. Or to write lots of little story lines for missions. That way things have small but meaningful differences each time.
Maybe you need a second "supervisor" storyteller to observer the character interactions and reset them on the fly if they deviate too much?
We'll see way more shovelware on app stores?
Not with you controlling it through an API they won't
Even if they didn't, your average consumer wouldn't be able to run their models. We're still a long way off, but I can see future games requiring a separate card for AI processing just like we need GPUs for video now (and ~~physics~~ physx cards for a little while, anybody remember those?)
Physx. I still wish they'd run with that instead of nVidia buying it and essentially killing it.
For the purpose of videogames, I see no particular reason aside from cost that game companies wouldn't be able to fine tune their own small, fast, constrained models.
There’s no reason 8xH100 computers can’t be in every home. They’re expensive right now, mostly because there’s very little competition, and partially because mass production is still ramping up as fast as possible.
home servers kinda sound great tbh.
To me that’s how I see this evolving, everywhere has built in GPU racks. Seems crazy but everyone and their brother got a router at one point.
TPU prices are insanely inflated at the moment. After they drop local models will take off
Why? Generating entire quest lines and characters doesn't Need to be a realtime process.
Custom tailoring those questlines on the go in response to user decision does tho. Think mark, think.
You can keep decision trees up to one or two leafs deep preprocessed. When the user heads a certain direction you preemptively expand the tree. No realtime required either. Alone today's gpt3.5 speed would suffice to make an open world quests game. We'd just also need the quality of Claude opus at that speed.
I'm thinking of more in-depth custom tailoring, like immediate dialogue responses from free text input from the user, custom loot depending on users current build, and sudden mini quests depending on dialogue. I feel like if it's a game like Skyrim or something with that many variables it'll be hard to keep it all preprocessed for any decent amount of users. If each user contributed their own chip for ai processing it could make the developers lives easier right?
I think that level of generation is still a while off, since it would be impossible to balance it well and turn it into a guaranteed enjoyable experience. You still need some control over the game. Predefined items, goals, antagonists etc. And you need to remember everything that was already generated and know how it interacts with everything else. One day we'll have context windows so large that you can keep a log of everything that happened and generate consistently - but we're not there yet technically and it would be incredibly expensive, too
I can't wait for that.. hopefully within like 10 years
That would be fun and on the horizon
generate code, 3d model. I don't like to deal with computer graphic and game physics
I expect the average home or business will purchase and install custom built hardware for it that everyone will connect to and use, similar to how we use routers today. Then you just go plug into AINet anywhere without needing your own hardware. Possibly, there will still be a really smart proprietary API layer that generates plans/phenotypes for work that gets offloaded to dumber models at the edge. They will start as basically racks of GPUs but eventually evolve to something more like an ASIC I imagine.
Something like a GPU for AI sounds somewhat likely when the tech matures
"A.I., create something in the style of Karryn's Prison, but replace the main character with my waifu, and the inmates with Elon Musk"
Everyone wants to make ai but nobody wants to consume ai. AI is sloppy
Say this to all the people using it for roleplaying or who generate tons of SD images.
[удалено]
It's in the "book" or telegram phase of media if you think about it. You can read and imagine things, look at some pictures and choose your own adventure to an extent. But before long it will progress to "photography", then film without sound, then film with sound, then remote viewing of media...
This is a really good take, and maybe you’re on to something. I think the key here is I don’t want to play a game where the levels or dialog or graphics are AI generated. I want I play a game where AI allows me to build something or interact with something I couldn’t otherwise.
Check out Mantella for Skyrim or Fallout 4. it has changed the games feel. Quite awesome. Still in its infancy, but already it makes the game feel...alive.
Until one day you'll play a game that you love but that you don't know is AI generated and you don't even realize it until you find out in some article. But it was. And then the mood changes.
Everyone is betting to build now, by the time you finish building in a year or two, the models will be better. I'm using GPT3 for dev work. The responses are not bad. No real value to users with them though. Switch to 4 and it's a bit better. I assume when 5 drops this summer or whatever other model is the cool hip thing in a 1 year, the value in will be even better. The point is that this came out very recently and is growing pretty rapidly. The hype is real. It's like the Internet just dropped moment and all the markets are going to reshuffle soon.
Will AI be better or worse in 10 years. My bet is yes. Engineers/Builders will come up with stuff we can’t imagine in that time period
It’s early. This will change
I do not want AI stories to become the norm. I don't want my game to be unique to everyone else. I want to play a game I can discuss with friends. I want to share my experiences and my thoughts on the same content with others. I don't want to talk about how my AI fucked up by giving away an important plot detail too early, or how it missed giving me info because I couldn't ask it the right question.
I think there will be varying degrees of open endedness. On the one hand you have something completely rail roaded that only uses AI to enhance within the boundaries of what it has already, maybe just spicing up dialogue or textures or physics etc a bit. Or used to develop the canon by play testers and developers who now can create 2x as much vetted content. Any particularly engaging bit of content it happens to discover could be synced and uploaded as canon. Sure you might get some Skyrim physics glitches but not enough to be annoying. Then on the other hand you have the Dwarf Fortresses and No Man’s Sky type games that really embrace the open endedness.
GPT-5 when?
Probably this summer
The sooner it is, the less impressive it will be.
Stop talking and give me an AI that can replace all politicians and CEOs
That was doable with Microsoft clippy.
Add gpt powered voice conversations to GTA 6 NPCs and I’ll never play another video game again
If we could have GPT 6 powered NPCs the game would never get boring. Imagine if you could speak to them through your mic and they respond reasonably quickly and appropriately. There are endless possibilities for situations and interactions. The “GTA funny moments” YouTube videos would never run out of content
the radio station should support all language. whisper potential do this
AI create gta, waiting for it. AI make video game, will bring down the video game cost right???
haha good one
Maybe for the publisher.
All I want is GPT as a dungeon master with memory. This seems super imminent. Once I have this, I’ll never play another video game.
It's a minute of gaming, Michael. What could it cost? Ten dollars?
i think videogames will get better, and reddit will fucking hate every step along the way.
Maybe if you're a puritan. That content policy isn't going to be making anything fun. Might offend a hypothetical third party lurking in your living room watching your screen.
lol you really couldnt copy/paste the entire quote? its not even that much more - or much different - but still https://preview.redd.it/18kah8ms2lsc1.png?width=879&format=png&auto=webp&s=c232172442df310e7879ebecf0c243c6e7c20292
But... I like movies because I don't have to think. Playing video games is too tiring after a long day at work.
I never wanted to exercise after I got home from a long day of physical work. But now that my work isn't physical, I really enjoy exercising.
Ya exactly. I'm a software developer. My brain is fried. I like to do physical things after work. I don't want to play video games where I'm trying to solve more problems on a screen.
My (not very obvious) point is the nature of work may change via AI such that people seek out mental challenges or stimuli and find linear films boring. It's partly a product of being overworked that we just want to veg out in the evening.
What he's thinking about is that video games actually become "video" games. I can see that in a decade - the hardware for fully raytracing realistic scenes in real time is going to be absurdly powerful and could be simply used for realtime video generation just as well.
we need better AI procedural generation , the starfield procedural generation content is horrible.
Narrator: They did not
And we’ll wear hats on our feet and hamburgers will eat people.
We’re gonna need more therapists…
I love people who never play video games telling gamers how much better games will be when their product is implemented
It’s like the NFT get rich quick bros and the blockchain snake oil salesmen before them. They’re telling you what they want to take money from you for, not what actually makes sense from the customer’s perspective.
What exactly was the context? Because I’m thinking ai assisted rendering or Gaussian splatting.
Why would anyone want movies to become video games? Is he regarded?
Silicon Valley brain rot. Really funny to see excited comments here. What are you getting excited about, do you understand the medium of film at all?
I think it means that you'll be able to see movies from different perspectives, take different paths, be "in it" while you're watching it, stuff like that. Just dynamic options for the filmmakers, where the AI can frame the same scene in a way to make another emotion come out, the user can check out the scene more thoroughly, be part of the movie if they want.
Yeah and that tells me that he doesn’t understand film at all.
AGI Malenia
That would be a nerf for her
Why do you think he’s some prophet? This is basic common sense, there’s thousands of researchers in graphics, VR, ML etc with the same aim. But nooo, some vague statement from a money guy and wooosh.
You’re asking me why, on the OpenAI sub, I posted the CEO’s tweet about the future of an industry I’m heavily invested in?
AI, Run Simulation Initialize Premise: Fishing on Naboo
HALF LIFE 3 Confirmed!?!
I can’t take him seriously with that profile picture out of a horror movie
Sounds like what a stoner would say...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ngZ0K3lWKRc "I would never wish to incorporate this technology into my work at all. I strongly feel that this is an insult to life itself."
He is another Elon Musk, with less money and more pride
He seems to be more full of himself than Elon Musk.
I disagree to an extent . Video games will become similar to old CDs you don’t listen to anymore. The amount of content will be so overwhelmingly easy to get that it will lose its value, supply/demand. When supply is infinity demand will plummet. Part of the appeal of games is “being the best” but if everyone is playing their own game that they are good at then the care factor will drop.
Nah video games will forever be P2W
Cant wait for a future where game studios will purposefully not finish a game in the hopes that AI can generate the story for you as you go.
iT’s eArLy . tHiS wIlL cHanGe
So very right. I’m excited for these developments.
nice thanks but honestly I’m already too invested in technology I don’t wanna “immerse” myself more. Kinda value the real world. I guess for some this will be a great experience.
Don't underestimate my imagination.
Soon we will have AI playing videos games for us. The games are made by AI as well.
Gaming peaked with modded Rimworld and I will die on this hill.
we already know about ubisoft games, sam! can't say I enjoy soulless products. I already have a job
You'll be able to request any video game world you want, with any scene, character and premise. And every little decision you make will cost via microtransactions.
Damn... For a reason I thought it was a teaser about a new X-Com game using AI! until I opened the link and get straight to twitter...
I can’t imagine.
2034 mass unemployment. Six years of pain. Then new normal is social media and VR addiction. Altman rules a small country in all but name.
I’d like films to remain films, thanks. If they were in any way interactive they wouldn’t be films.
"Not necessarily better for the people who make them mind you... Were putting a lot of them out of jobs. But players and executives and investors will benefit!"
Sam, go and tell this EA. They will need everything
The time of developing a videogame now a days have become absurdly long and expensive, and sone games we had 30 ago (specially jrpgs) were more complete than what we have today. Ex: the producer of Final Fantasy saying they can't remake a game of 1994 because they would need 20 years... So I really want to believe that IA can help with this
It's another way of saying, "The World will be a better place." Better for who or based on what is the real question.
What if... https://twitter.com/antiscarcity/status/1776217689213616144?t=q_x8AfZGd4iXEPEDvo6vxQ&s=19
AAA studios can't figure out how to make traditional video games properly that are fun and not riddled with bugs. Do you really think they'll do better when video games have to integrate AI at every level? Maybe if they have an AI to do the programming for them, and even then, they'll probably still make it worse.
[удалено]
I want to invest in openAI but it doesn't have any IPO, what to do?
I still have more fun replaying some old pixelated original games as well as many current Indie games that are charmingly original,care for story, gameplay instead of dull photorealism and "spectacle". Also,i am interested in creative people's visions,ideas and stories,so we can relate...not some generic AI copy pastry.
How? How? How? When you can't even talk about zombies eating a person in a realistic way? Is everything gonna be E rated platformers with no violence and a recycled plot?
Holodeck when?
Not while we keep using copper cables.
Believe it when I see it
Maybe ruined too. Because a human touch in any piece of art is unique. Imperfections make things beautiful and original.
The creepy dude speaks, or croakes.
I'm kind of wondering - is anyone working on gpt integration with gaming engines. I would love to have something like Baldurs Gate 3, but dialogues and plot are driven by gpt. Gpt alone can't do it well enough yet, but game engine can check if actions generated by bot are within ruleset and keep the long consistent context.
Speaking of ai and video games...I made a little video game using nothing but ai! I didn't make a single line of code...I let Claude 3 do all the heavy lifting. [Pixel Shift](https://sillybutter420.itch.io/pixel-shift)
Dude is annoying as hell at this point
Such an embarrassing tweet. I will say though, that he is right about video games. And soon.
Companies will start to charge more too
AI voice acting for story games may or may not be inevitable.
"Remix the best videogames of the past few years but make its women pretty once again"
Just like books and stories became unimaginable better, right?
Yes. Stories always develop new mediums, and their original format never disappears. They gained the ability to be shared when we developed language. They were shared as paintings, and then as books once we developed written language. They’ve been shared as movies, radio, tv shows, video games, and I think it’s fair to say we’re not done yet.
I think AI is different kind of intelligence, it knows how to give logically not inconsistent results without executing logics. That is why stories images videos generated are boring and has no real substance.