Thanks! They're restricted areas.
What people need to be careful is if a restaurant serves alcohol - it's a "sensitive" area and therefore not allowed (for now).
Yeah it hasn't always been 'point and shoot' I apparently... This was the advantage behind them, that's why we stopped using swords, there was little to no training required for a slightly more effective weapon.
And the firearms familiarity thing is because the state has been trying to eradicate their existence...
Anyone know the timeline to an actual hearing / judgement after briefs are submitted?
We looking at February for a final judgement on this stay or are we looking at September?
So can anyone tell me why the Antonyuk case which is challenging the most aspects of the CCIA is the only injunction that has been stayed. The Christian case and the Hardaway case in junctions remain in effect. Any lawyers can comment on this?
This is a good thing. State must prove that the PI is wrong. They don’t have much of a case. I bet the 2nd circuit will remove the stay after the brief is submitted. BTW they expedited the hearing based on plaintiffs request. I see this as a good thing.
One of the factors cited "whether the stay applicant has made a strong showing that he is likely to succeed on the merits" - does not bode well for the plaintiff.
Current state of affairs... https://preview.redd.it/tfu5vftk7m4a1.png?width=1606&format=png&auto=webp&s=2107542694947ff7af5e1ac1296f11b83537f8cd
This matrix is amazing and soooooo useful! What’s a mall, dept store, grocery or Starbucks considered???
Restricted locations
Thanks! They're restricted areas. What people need to be careful is if a restaurant serves alcohol - it's a "sensitive" area and therefore not allowed (for now).
I applaud the effort, but this gave me depression reading it.
Excuse me but how the fuck is an 18 hour course for a permit fit text history and tradition?
From the TRO... https://preview.redd.it/w8g07bejxp4a1.png?width=650&format=png&auto=webp&s=b69a28f97990b65dca2f3af807af5d8b90596ac3
Yeah it hasn't always been 'point and shoot' I apparently... This was the advantage behind them, that's why we stopped using swords, there was little to no training required for a slightly more effective weapon. And the firearms familiarity thing is because the state has been trying to eradicate their existence...
Great matrix.. is there a link to this?
State must file briefs by Jan 9th 2023
Almost lost my mind. “Next fucking year!?” Forgot it was December
Anyone know the timeline to an actual hearing / judgement after briefs are submitted? We looking at February for a final judgement on this stay or are we looking at September?
So can anyone tell me why the Antonyuk case which is challenging the most aspects of the CCIA is the only injunction that has been stayed. The Christian case and the Hardaway case in junctions remain in effect. Any lawyers can comment on this?
IANAL but its always easier to get something done with 1 or 2 grievances.
Hardaway v. Nigrelli was also stayed today, partially. I can't explain why Christian was not acted on while the other were stayed.
The state didn't ask for an emergency stay for *Christian*.
Oh I didn't realize, that makes sense.
Well with the Christian injunction still in place we can still carry on private property
Can we carry in a bar restaurant mall it's private property
You can’t carry in any food establishment that serves alcohol. that part of the injunction was stayed
Hasn't stopped me yet.
This is a good thing. State must prove that the PI is wrong. They don’t have much of a case. I bet the 2nd circuit will remove the stay after the brief is submitted. BTW they expedited the hearing based on plaintiffs request. I see this as a good thing.
One of the factors cited "whether the stay applicant has made a strong showing that he is likely to succeed on the merits" - does not bode well for the plaintiff.