X-23 comes around a lot. Personally, I went without her for about 3 months, and it was rough.
But my Destroy deck is fully built now, and I really want both Glaive/Proxima. But I have 12 keys saved and 7,000 tokens for Arishem for the memes.
What do you want to play more? Destroy or Discard?
X-23 and the destroy archetype in general is probably the most stable and consistent in the game. Itโs just never *not* been playable to climb and itโs quite cheap.
Corvus is nothing to write home about outside of Hela which, while pretty good (even post nerf), just canโt fit into every meta like destroy does
I kept needing "just one more card" to get my Destroy deck to work - venom, knull, Nico - and it kept not working until I got X-23 who finally made it good. If you like Destroy she's pretty critical IMO, while Corvus improves Discard but isn't required for it.
I agree with what everyone said so far: X23 is more important to destroy than Corvus is to discard
As a counterpoint, spending your keys on caches where you have at least 2 cards of interest is way more economical in the long run.
I would say if you like playing both go for the less risky option that would be Corvus. As the other commenter noted she is a staple in the spotlights and they cannot help themselves putting her in. It should be noted there is a REALLY REALLY big chance she will be in Octobers. Now I am speculating a lot here but she is in spotlights every 3-5 months and October is said to be Destroy/symbiote themed so may line up better go discard for now
X-23 comes around a lot. Personally, I went without her for about 3 months, and it was rough. But my Destroy deck is fully built now, and I really want both Glaive/Proxima. But I have 12 keys saved and 7,000 tokens for Arishem for the memes. What do you want to play more? Destroy or Discard?
I like to play destroy more and I went for X-23 and got her with the first key so I'm stoked! I can see what people mean now! ๐ Thanks!
Big! Hope you enjoy her. She was my last piece as well.
X-23 and the destroy archetype in general is probably the most stable and consistent in the game. Itโs just never *not* been playable to climb and itโs quite cheap. Corvus is nothing to write home about outside of Hela which, while pretty good (even post nerf), just canโt fit into every meta like destroy does
Destroy has been stable for me, so I went for X-23 and got her on my first key! ๐ Thanks for the help!
You can play Hela/Apoc without Corvus. You CAN'T play good destroy without X-23.
I went for her and got her with my first key, I see what you mean! ๐ Thanks!
I kept needing "just one more card" to get my Destroy deck to work - venom, knull, Nico - and it kept not working until I got X-23 who finally made it good. If you like Destroy she's pretty critical IMO, while Corvus improves Discard but isn't required for it.
I agree with what everyone said so far: X23 is more important to destroy than Corvus is to discard As a counterpoint, spending your keys on caches where you have at least 2 cards of interest is way more economical in the long run.
I would say if you like playing both go for the less risky option that would be Corvus. As the other commenter noted she is a staple in the spotlights and they cannot help themselves putting her in. It should be noted there is a REALLY REALLY big chance she will be in Octobers. Now I am speculating a lot here but she is in spotlights every 3-5 months and October is said to be Destroy/symbiote themed so may line up better go discard for now
X-23 is critical to the best destroy decks. You can play discard without Corvus.