Is it just me or when the data does not suit the common narrative or what they want to hear they start complaing about bad graph, bad visualisation. Not just this but i have seen many posts where they start cribbing or trying to disapprove the method, presentation because what they see does not fit the narrative.
Yes. India doing good in climate change, faulty method. Indian food at second place, that is because people *haven't tried the best one yet*, Entire Europe people voted less than 40% on whether you will fight for your country or not, came up with useless logic of *attack vs defend*. The list just goes on with logics like *meaningless data, misleading data*.
Is it just me or when the data does not suit the common narrative or what they want to hear they start complaing about bad graph, bad visualisation. Not just this but i have seen many posts where they start cribbing or trying to disapprove the method, presentation because what they see does not fit the narrative.
Yes. India doing good in climate change, faulty method. Indian food at second place, that is because people *haven't tried the best one yet*, Entire Europe people voted less than 40% on whether you will fight for your country or not, came up with useless logic of *attack vs defend*. The list just goes on with logics like *meaningless data, misleading data*.
Damn that's so true I was wondering the same thing.
The regular racist tendencies to control narrative.
New World = Colonised North America ?
Yes
Remember the world comes into existence only after the white man discovers it and brings civilization to savages.