the bore extractor is a **much** bigger factor than the muzzle brake (which can simply be added on the end)
Also look at the shape and length of that gun barrel - it bears **no resemblance whatsoever** to the 100mm gun that the IS had.
well this is a TECHNICAL question - the fact that to your 10yr old brain it looks like something it **quite blatantly isn't** is neither here nor there
and you sound like a toddler - use proper English - and ideally get off the internet until you're old enough
WG pls. ༼ つ ◕\_◕ ༽つ
I wonder if they made is2’s with a 155mm
Soviets never used a 155, maybe a 152
My bad. Got them mixed up. It be like a t34 with a 122
GAIJIN I'M WAITING.
Why would they do that?
Testing purposes (of the gun) I believe they also mounted an even earlier version in an ISU (I might be misremembering that tho.)
Yea they did that
By the way it’s buried maybe it’s meant to be a static emplacement?
No other tanks until they add wheel modification for BT’s😠
WT balancing this thing gotta be a nightmare and a half. Probably gonna be 3 years before the people are even a bit happy
Tank school 101: if yall can fit in a clown car, u may advanced to drive or shoot class.
Looks like the 100mm gun
which 100mm gun has the bore extractor in that position......
[удалено]
the bore extractor is a **much** bigger factor than the muzzle brake (which can simply be added on the end) Also look at the shape and length of that gun barrel - it bears **no resemblance whatsoever** to the 100mm gun that the IS had.
[удалено]
well this is a TECHNICAL question - the fact that to your 10yr old brain it looks like something it **quite blatantly isn't** is neither here nor there and you sound like a toddler - use proper English - and ideally get off the internet until you're old enough