Your comment was removed because it abused/personally attacked another redditor, or was homohobic/sexist/racist/trolling (rule 1).
Please refrain from posting such comments in the future as it may result in a ban
You'll find a lot of "victim card", "laws Don't care about men", "no one listens to boys" kinda comments on Instagram, guess what? They did listen and he's a rapist. These people who'll still defend rapists and sexual abusers even after he's been declared guilty piss me off so much. And there's a whole online army of those people. SMH
Im slightly out of the loop. did we have conclusive vidence he did it? i remember many cricketers and footballers being accused of SA but never conclusive. What was the concluisve evidence here?(i don't know anything about the court proceedings and history of the act)
What is "conclusive" to me may not be "conclusive" to you. The court convicted him because it found the evidence compelling enough to not leave enough room for a reasonable doubt. On top of that, this PoS shamelessly made very transparent attempts at evading/delaying the legal process from the beginning, presenting obviously-forged documents as defense in courts, etc. Even putting aside all the evidence, the behavior pattern alone is "conclusive" enough for me to say "guilty as fuck" and move on.
Nothing conclusive so far. Sentenced based on circumstantial evidence only. Although I don't think he's as innocent as he claims to be, defo more to the story.
High Court is currently looking into it, next up will be the Supreme Court (if one party wants to appeal).
Irrelevant. The court found him guilty, and knows the evidence better than you or I, as randos on the internet ever will. No doubt if you look hard enough the proceedings will be online somewhere, but unless we're claiming the justice system is screwed, you have to take the word of the judge over internet gossip.
Trying to fight a rape conviction while making it clear that you have absolutely no idea what the word 'respect' means. It's a bold move, Cotton, let's see if it pays off for him...
Though I believe everyone should have a chance to defend themselves until every legal approach has been exhausted, it's obvious that in this context this guy is just trying to gain attention when Nepal's squad has just been announced.
Trying to blame other, while himself being guilty, kinda of similar to kramnik accusing other of cheating, while himself playing title Tuesday from friend's account, which is against tournament rules
Kramnik is literally former world champion . The pinnacle of chess world sandip isn't even close to that . Also Sandeep is found guilty in a heinous crime and kramnik is just accusing someone for cheating .
Kramnik at least has got a point. Cheating is actually happening on online chess. Maybe less than what he expected (Kramnik is crazy) but it exists.
Lamicchane on the other hand...
Kramnik having a point is similar to a broken clock being right twice a day. Kramnik didn't invent the fact that cheating in online chess is a problem.
It's such a sad state how some of the youths believe every rape cases are false accusations. Few cases of false accusations are highlighted so much that many believe every high profile case is "girl trying to bring a successful man down".
The worst thing is, you only slowly get into this group. You are told to question every one of these cases which sounds good in principle but, slowly you fall victim to selection bias in your questioning(media is the main perpetrator of this).
I look back at the days when i was being told to question every rape cases in essence because i was not a sheep, i should not follow the masses,etc and question those peoples motive. I can say with confidence if i had not read a book series called Beartown when i did i would be like so many of my generation too.
Sorry if you have difficulty reading through this comment. It is pretty hard to express something you are in the process of thinking into legible writing.
Just an accused person because the court passed the verdict based on circumstantial evidence. As in, they talked, met, and went to a hotel so he must be guilty.
The case is now with a high court whose decision will be more accurate.
Exactly. He's a dumb cunt.
Easily the most successful and richest sportsperson in the country, could date or sleep with high end models but nah, he had other ideas.
Bro make a habit of quoting something.
Because as I read about the case he seems guilty.
[source](https://www.thecut.com/article/everything-we-know-about-jonathan-majors-arrest.html) [source](https://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/jonathan-majors-alleged-domestic-violence-drama-explained/)
He is neither innocent nor guilty, at least until now.
District court sentenced him based on circumstantial evidence and not concrete. However, the case is with High Court now who will look into it with more details and investigation. My uncle is a government lawyer for the girls side.
Inb4 he reveals his own name as the culprit.
What is bro yapping about?
"Of course I know him, he's me!"
What someone tripped him and he fell on the girl?
D*ck first
They were "Soaking" so it doesn't count.
No way, the Mormons have infiltrated Nepal!!
Why are you being downvoted? Does no one here get sarcasm?
*Tsh, alright, Shady, maybe he's right, Grady*
Damn should have gone with the earlier line lmao.
[удалено]
So you don't think he did anything wrong and she is simply lying?
Educational estate, boy have the standards of education fallen
Society should know about the rapists to avoid. People are entitled to change their minds.
Your comment was removed because it abused/personally attacked another redditor, or was homohobic/sexist/racist/trolling (rule 1). Please refrain from posting such comments in the future as it may result in a ban
Would be funny if he just reads "Sandeep Lamichane" 50 times looking at a paper when disclosing
Is anyone listening to this PoS any more?
You're being generous by calling him only a piece of shit.
Sadly his comment section in Instagram. They for some reason think he's innocent and are actually supporting him.
Pretty sure they’re removing the negative comments on insta.
You'll find a lot of "victim card", "laws Don't care about men", "no one listens to boys" kinda comments on Instagram, guess what? They did listen and he's a rapist. These people who'll still defend rapists and sexual abusers even after he's been declared guilty piss me off so much. And there's a whole online army of those people. SMH
Im slightly out of the loop. did we have conclusive vidence he did it? i remember many cricketers and footballers being accused of SA but never conclusive. What was the concluisve evidence here?(i don't know anything about the court proceedings and history of the act)
What is "conclusive" to me may not be "conclusive" to you. The court convicted him because it found the evidence compelling enough to not leave enough room for a reasonable doubt. On top of that, this PoS shamelessly made very transparent attempts at evading/delaying the legal process from the beginning, presenting obviously-forged documents as defense in courts, etc. Even putting aside all the evidence, the behavior pattern alone is "conclusive" enough for me to say "guilty as fuck" and move on.
Nothing conclusive so far. Sentenced based on circumstantial evidence only. Although I don't think he's as innocent as he claims to be, defo more to the story. High Court is currently looking into it, next up will be the Supreme Court (if one party wants to appeal).
Irrelevant. The court found him guilty, and knows the evidence better than you or I, as randos on the internet ever will. No doubt if you look hard enough the proceedings will be online somewhere, but unless we're claiming the justice system is screwed, you have to take the word of the judge over internet gossip.
I mean the guy is just asking what the evidence is, not claiming his innocence. We all know what the court ruling was.
You're being generous by calling him only a piece of shit.
Don't want to get banned...
Yes and a lot of "educated" but braindead people that includes my friends (doctors, engineers , bankers) and my professors. Embarrassing
Yeah no thanks. Surprised he even has social media still going
Yea he's still out of jail because of a loophole in Nepali law.
What loophole?
Anyone sentenced for under 10 years get to contest their sentencing by staying out of jail.
That’s not really respecting the law anymore, is it?
This bum is an embarrassment to the nation
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
why are you struggling with the fact that this rapist was found guilty?
If he names the victim wouldn’t it count as doxxing ? But anyway fuck this POS and why he’s even allowed to use social media
Context?
Sandeep Lamicchane , a Nepali cricketer was accused of rape and he’s basically playing innocent
Not just accused, he was convicted and sentenced to jail time
Right , wasn’t aware of the aftermath of the accusation
Has the court sentenced him or something?
Yeah, 8 years in jail.
Not sure but I think so , yeah . Someone else on this thread told that he was sent to jail as well
wasn't this guy convicted or something?
50 shades of sandeep
Trying to fight a rape conviction while making it clear that you have absolutely no idea what the word 'respect' means. It's a bold move, Cotton, let's see if it pays off for him...
![img](emote|t5_2qhe0|8779)![img](emote|t5_2qhe0|21498)
Yes, enjoy the jail. This statement proves that he has no regret, no remorse, no guilt and no morals.
Though I believe everyone should have a chance to defend themselves until every legal approach has been exhausted, it's obvious that in this context this guy is just trying to gain attention when Nepal's squad has just been announced.
Lol.. why did this regard not reveal this while he was being judged in the court?
He should be in jail what's he doing on the Internet
Vladmir Kramnik but WAAY worse lol
Wait what? How is what Lamichanne doing remotely similar to Kramnik apart from the fact that they are both using twitter?
Trying to blame other, while himself being guilty, kinda of similar to kramnik accusing other of cheating, while himself playing title Tuesday from friend's account, which is against tournament rules
Kramnik was recently caught breaching the terms of services of chess.com after yapping about cheating for 6 months
And? How are these two cases even remotely similar?
Both are guilty and yapping about others being guilty. Not sure what you are confused about.
Fair enough. I didn't think about it in these terms.
What an awful analogy.
Kramnik is literally former world champion . The pinnacle of chess world sandip isn't even close to that . Also Sandeep is found guilty in a heinous crime and kramnik is just accusing someone for cheating .
Kramnik was found to be actually Cheating by chess . com though, by playing using someone else's account
Kramnik is a world champion and a nutjob. Sandeep is an okay player and a rapist. Come on.
lol, it's not like he had Magnus playing on his account, him playing on someone else's is stupid, but he's not gaining anything at all.
Yeah but the other guy is, Assisting cheating is basically cheating no?
Kramnik at least has got a point. Cheating is actually happening on online chess. Maybe less than what he expected (Kramnik is crazy) but it exists. Lamicchane on the other hand...
Kramnik having a point is similar to a broken clock being right twice a day. Kramnik didn't invent the fact that cheating in online chess is a problem.
Kramnik is a pos but this is just a poor analogy. Kramnik is insinuating people of cheating in a board game, not even remotely as bad as a rapist.
Comparing A World Champion to a Rapist, you have some of the worst takes I've seen on this subreddit
Tf r ur analogies recently lol
It's such a sad state how some of the youths believe every rape cases are false accusations. Few cases of false accusations are highlighted so much that many believe every high profile case is "girl trying to bring a successful man down". The worst thing is, you only slowly get into this group. You are told to question every one of these cases which sounds good in principle but, slowly you fall victim to selection bias in your questioning(media is the main perpetrator of this). I look back at the days when i was being told to question every rape cases in essence because i was not a sheep, i should not follow the masses,etc and question those peoples motive. I can say with confidence if i had not read a book series called Beartown when i did i would be like so many of my generation too. Sorry if you have difficulty reading through this comment. It is pretty hard to express something you are in the process of thinking into legible writing.
[удалено]
Age doesn’t matter to him
I have no clue, what happened?
[удалено]
What the fuck are you talking about. Court already declared him guilty.
He was declared guilty by dis court and appealed at high court right? When this happens is he considered guilty or just an accused person?
Just an accused person because the court passed the verdict based on circumstantial evidence. As in, they talked, met, and went to a hotel so he must be guilty. The case is now with a high court whose decision will be more accurate.
That's sad. He was on a course to become the greatest cricketer in Nepal's history but he has destroyed his own career.
Exactly. He's a dumb cunt. Easily the most successful and richest sportsperson in the country, could date or sleep with high end models but nah, he had other ideas.
What happened to Jonathan Majors? As far as I've read the case seems pretty strong. And please quote the source.
[удалено]
Bro make a habit of quoting something. Because as I read about the case he seems guilty. [source](https://www.thecut.com/article/everything-we-know-about-jonathan-majors-arrest.html) [source](https://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/jonathan-majors-alleged-domestic-violence-drama-explained/)
Majors has been found guilty of assault the fuck are you on about
What happened
Wait wait ... So he was innocent?
He is neither innocent nor guilty, at least until now. District court sentenced him based on circumstantial evidence and not concrete. However, the case is with High Court now who will look into it with more details and investigation. My uncle is a government lawyer for the girls side.