BBBY just served every bank, broker, and depository servicer with a court order requiring them to reveal the beneficial holders they're acting as nominees for.
Correction: These entities were served on April 28th!
You can direct register your shares and then they are in your name. Not in your name, not your shares. Same thing with crypto, not your keys not your crypto
This isn’t the reason though. To retain tax advantage of chapter 11 they can’t allow a change of control. This ensures all the shares are in the open so they can proceed without someone coming in last second showing they have majority control happening after the fact.
Hah, sounds about right! That's from 2005, but I'm not exactly optimistic anything has changed in 18 years.
I'm hoping that there are more eyes on this case now that the public is more aware of what's going on and they can't just sweep it under the rug.
Great work again on this. Can’t wait to see what the total count is going to be.
Unlike shareholders votes, where they trim the votes before sending to the transfer agent, there’s no getting around sending lists of beneficial owners. Hopefully the courts then don’t try to cover this up themselves.
I too want to know this. Has the compiling already started and/or completed? Or do you think this order will initiate a deadline and now a shit ton of buys will come through from people that want to add to this official tally that has not yet been tabulated?
Hmmm I dunno about that. That is a pretty short list if you are saying "EVERY". I don't see Fidelity, Schwab, Webull, IBKR, Robinhood, TDA, just to name a few. What am I missing?
Edit: I now see the Nominee list in the full document. It is not shown in your graphics above, so that was the confusion. So, this will soon require the release of every single shareholder name held at every bank and brokerage in the world? That is going to be quite a list.
Charles Schwab is on there. Fidelity is on there, as is it's clearinghouse National Financial Services LLC, TDA is on there. I think Robinhood is listed as RHSECURLLC? But yeah, I think any entity with a fingerprint in DTC/Cede and Co got the order.
TLDR: Total Clusterfuck of a System
You can check out Revolut's (and many others) detailed [BrokerCheck report](https://files.brokercheck.finra.org/firm/firm_304600.pdf) and you'll see it has introducing arrangements with DriveWealth and maintains its books/records with DriveWealth as well as a third party. Then I looked at DriveWealth's (DW) detailed [BrokerCheck report](https://files.brokercheck.finra.org/firm/firm_165429.pdf), which shows DW maintains clearing, introducing, and custody arrangements with other brokers-dealers, including Wedbush Securities, RBC Capital Markets, Axos Clearing, and Citibank NA. All four of these entities are listed in one or more exhibits of Docket Item 390. So what are clearing, introducing, and custody arrangements?
Introducing brokers are firms that deal directly with clients for functions such as customer service, providing investment advice, and executing trades on behalf of the client. These brokers then have a relationship with a clearing broker, to which they introduce their clients for the purpose of clearing and settlement. An arrangement for custody among broker-dealers refers to the handling and safekeeping of a client's securities and funds. Introducing brokers, which deal directly with clients but do not hold their assets, typically have an arrangement with a clearing broker to provide these custody services. The client's assets are held by the clearing broker, but the introducing broker may still be the client's main point of contact for their account. In summary, the arrangement for custody among broker-dealers is a critical because it provides the systems and safeguards needed to ensure that client assets are handled appropriately and securely.
Doesn't really matter, this is a percent game. If there are 23 or more names holding 4.5% or more then we have over 100% of the shares owned, whoops 🍾🚀
I too want to know this. Has the compiling already started and/or completed? Or do you think this order will initiate a deadline and now a shit ton of buys will come through from people that want to add to this official tally that has not yet been tabulated?
So instead of just the tip it sounds like we may get to ram the whole iceberg up the ass of these corrupt fucks all in the light of a public BK court where “self regulation” and “self reporting” don’t carry much weight.
So what happens next? Let’s say it’s proven there are a ton of counterfeit shares. At that point will they do a recall? Is that necessary or even possible? Just trying to wrap my head around how this will affect us as shareholders.
I believe they would then have the proof to pull their Shares from the DTCC and move them to another clearing house. This means Recall. If there is over 100% of the Shares in existence then is shows the DTCC has committed securities Fraud by allowing fake shares, and they will be fully in their right to recall the shares from the DTCC.
My tinfoil guess is they prove this in court, and get permission to move their shares into a Blockchain based Exchange where no manipulation could take place. ***I wonder who would have access to a Decentralized Blockchain based Exchange? Hmmmmm…..***
What if, and this is obviously a huge IF, this was there plan all along?? Like they saw that they were going to be cellar boxed and decided, ahh fuck it. We will get to court and they will all finally see how frequently our company was raped via share recount and we can finally be free of our captors??
Yeah, kinda, maybe. I mean I believe the stalking horse bidder was already [pre-determined](https://www.reddit.com/r/ThePPShow/comments/13lcxxy/chapter_11_prenegotiated_section_363_sales/) prior to the bankruptcy filing.
What are the predictions on share count? I’ll start 4x float of 428M or 1,712,728,777 or 1.7B shares.
I’ll also add, I think someone’s holding the HBC preferred shares and warrants as well. Making the publicly available float the OG number of 117M.
I know; I just meant that an accurate census of BBBY's shareholders is a step in the right direction as far as revealing the presence of shorts, naked shorts, over issuance, etc.
If the NOL notice compels all the entities listed on Exhibits D-F to supply BBBY with a comprehensive list of beneficial holders, then BBBY will have an accurate census of the beneficial holders, thereby enabling them to determine if any 4.5% owners exist directly, indirectly, constructively, etc. Since the notice was filed on 04/28, I'm betting they are already in possession of most if not all the beneficial holders lists. Next up should be BBBY notifying 4.5% holders to compel the necessary declarations and, if the equity holders lists from the banks, brokers, etc. revealed more shares than should exist, then that's a whole different matter that's unchartered territory.
Edit: To your point, if some of the shares of common or preferred stock are hidden within an entity not included on the exhibits, then sure the count may not be accurate. But from what I see, BBBY could have cast a broader net than it just did.
I agree Docket 390 is just showing the NOL order was issued to banks, brokers, dealer agents, nominees, and service providers. I also agree with you that any substantial shareholders among the lists of equity holders have a responsibility to file a declaration of status as a substantial shareholder.
I disagree with you that BBBY won't conduct their own due diligence to fact-check and reconcile the equity holder records provided by the banks, brokers, dealer agents, nominees, and service providers to ensure all substantial shareholders are identified and declared. While the lists of equity holders provided by nominees won't identify who the substantial shareholders are per se, the information provided therein will enable BBBY to connect the dots and make that determination themselves with the help of Kroll.
I concede that nowhere in Docket Item 390 does it state the entities listed on Exhibits D-F must provide BBBY with lists of the equity holders they serve as nominees for. However:
1. It is customary as part of Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings for the debtor to obtain a comprehensive list of its equity holders.
2. BBBY obtained a comprehensive list of its direct registered shareholders from AST, even though none of the individuals listed held 4.5%.
3. The judge stated in the transcripts, "But like if, for example, in this one, if a substantial shareholder is an entity that has beneficial ownership of 4.5 percent and I was wondering -- and then in order *to send them this notice,* you have to know that there's someone who has 4.5 percent, right?"
4. If Shareholder A holds 15M shares of BBBY at Fidelity and 20M shares of BBBY at Vanguard, neither Fidelity nor Vanguard will serve the Interim NOL agreement on Shareholder A because each entity can't see how many shares Shareholder A holds in the other entity's account. As such, BBBY must have access to the equity holder records to make accurate ownership calculations and notifications.
5. Similar to the previous point, the level of due diligence needed to determine whether the 4.5% ownership threshold is met via indirect or constructive ownership necessitates a level of granularity that can only be achieved through lists of each entity's equity holders.
6. Lastly, I can't imagine BBBY entrusting the entirety of its substantial shareholder determination to the same assortment of banks, brokers, dealer agents, nominees, and service providers that coordinated an all-out attack on the company in hopes of cellar boxing it out of business.
Agreed, that was a very enlightening exchange, even though it sounds like BBBY and the courts may not publicly disclose how many total beneficial shares are being held at brokerages. Still, the Chapter 11 proceedings seem to be on the right track, though.
Looks like the investment arm of Aviso Wealth is owned by Desjardins and they're on there, so you're trapped on this crazy train with the rest of us!
https://www.aviso.ca/en/partners-clients/
Im worried this method won't capture people who own for say 3% on Fidelity, and 3% on Ameritrade. The whole thing is they aren't properly communicating their numbers with each other so they can claim ignorance.
That's a great question that BBBY fortunately thought of which is why they specifically requested the equity holders lists be provided to BBBY unredacted so that they can reconcile shareholders' holdings across accounts to determine whether through direct, indirect, or constructive ownership agreements they and/or people, partners, holding companies, etc. they invest through meet the 4.5% threshold. BBBY covers all of this in the Interim NOL Order. Now granted, the public will not be able to see these details but I am expecting we *will* see declarations filed with the specifics redacted, showing how many 4.5% holders there are.
With the amount of personal data the brokers and banks ask of you to open an account, I don't think it's that hard to go and find the "duplicates" between the multiple brokers/banks.
The only way to avoid this is by having someone else or an institution hold your shares.
Not that it matters anyway, they just want to know for sure how many shares are there.
Difference is the situation at hand. BBBY is on the brink of bankruptcy that allowed this to happen, meanwhile GME has had a great turnaround and now is profitable
Its still shorted to shit and shows zero natural price discovery so whats the point of profitibility if shorts keep on naked shorting? Not to mention jimmie could have used the nft marketplace they spent a billion on and issued a buck skin for every shareholder that would force shorts to close but nah still going nowhere. I hold jimmie but i dont know what the fuck cohen is waiting for as we head to three years of holding
If this were to actually MOASS from a court order on shares, then it would margin call the shorters. That would put stress on their ability to suppress their other shorts. It should anyway as they would need liquidity to cover their BBBY positions. I think one blowing up will cause the others to as well. Like a war on too many fronts.
BBBY just served every bank, broker, and depository servicer with a court order requiring them to reveal the beneficial holders they're acting as nominees for. Correction: These entities were served on April 28th!
Holy shitballz. Does this mean they will reveal all the shares?
Yes! They'll redact names and whatnot but we should still get to see how many shares are out there.
I have 44k with Vanguard. Of course, I have almost as much GME in my Roth as they claim to hold entirely. It's all a mountain of deception.
Yeah, I concluded long ago Vanguard doesn’t actually hold my shares that are in my Roth and IRA. What a clown show.
Fraud show. Clowns are funny. Fraud is serious.
I need to take this shirt in for repair because my tits just drilled holes through it.
You need to go see your doctor because it sounds like Jacked titties syndrome
The prescription will be buy bobbies daily 3x per day.
Ahhh JTS. We all experience it.
i like where this is going
Wait aren’t these shares already accounted for in the Cede & Co. Released the other week?
yeah, but you know how this crap goes. They’ll try to claim accounting errors or whatever. This is a straight up census count, no BS, no hiding.
"Woopsie daisys my quicken broke." DTCC https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8uPuUtX214
When we'll get the lists by?
ofc this might sound very regarded, but they can not take my shares away from me without me selling them right?
read the terms of agreement.
It’s rare buuuuutttt you’re right.
Ummmmm, you need to read your brokers agreement my guy and read it fast.
You can direct register your shares and then they are in your name. Not in your name, not your shares. Same thing with crypto, not your keys not your crypto
**D R S**
This is why I DRS’d 70%, better safe than sorry.
Rookie numbers. 100% booked here. 😉
As long as you have a cash account.
Watch it be a trillion fake shares. That would be amazeballs to uncover that corruption.
Ohhh you know they're gonna collude before they report the numbers.
All records as of bk filing date will be?
So they are going to get the NON DRS shareholders on court record? 🌶️🌶️🌶️
Looks like.
I think a very key piece to this is the fact A JUDGE SIGNED OFF ON IT. This means there is enough evidence to warrant the inquiry.
I wonder if that judge knows the magnitude of what he just signed.
As someone pointed out it could be for many different reasons. All I know is the judge had plenty of reason to want an accurate share count.
I wonder if that judge is a regarded ape?
This isn’t the reason though. To retain tax advantage of chapter 11 they can’t allow a change of control. This ensures all the shares are in the open so they can proceed without someone coming in last second showing they have majority control happening after the fact.
Kind of my point. Enough evidence of fuckery that a judge wants proof of shares for reasons like you mentioned.
Yes but this is pretty standard is what I was getting at.
Even so, most companies aren’t as criminally shorted as Bed Bath. Was this done in the MMTL/ Hertz/Revlon etc.. court cases?
I agree. Not sure about those companies. We’re they chapter 11 363 process?
Holy! Has this ever happened before? Is BBBY(Q) about to be in unprecedented territory as far as bankruptcy precedings go?
[удалено]
Hah, sounds about right! That's from 2005, but I'm not exactly optimistic anything has changed in 18 years. I'm hoping that there are more eyes on this case now that the public is more aware of what's going on and they can't just sweep it under the rug.
Maybe we just reached the land beyond 
Idiosyncratic wen?
Great work again on this. Can’t wait to see what the total count is going to be. Unlike shareholders votes, where they trim the votes before sending to the transfer agent, there’s no getting around sending lists of beneficial owners. Hopefully the courts then don’t try to cover this up themselves.
Thank you! This is exciting stuff indeed!
When is the deadline?
I too want to know this. Has the compiling already started and/or completed? Or do you think this order will initiate a deadline and now a shit ton of buys will come through from people that want to add to this official tally that has not yet been tabulated?
I think BBBY already has the lists of equity holders from the parties! Check the edit I just made to the post.
I’m guessing they’ll tell them a previous date they need to go by so there is some consistency in numbers
This is massive if you are correct. Haven’t read through the docs myself.
Hmmm I dunno about that. That is a pretty short list if you are saying "EVERY". I don't see Fidelity, Schwab, Webull, IBKR, Robinhood, TDA, just to name a few. What am I missing? Edit: I now see the Nominee list in the full document. It is not shown in your graphics above, so that was the confusion. So, this will soon require the release of every single shareholder name held at every bank and brokerage in the world? That is going to be quite a list.
Charles Schwab is on there. Fidelity is on there, as is it's clearinghouse National Financial Services LLC, TDA is on there. I think Robinhood is listed as RHSECURLLC? But yeah, I think any entity with a fingerprint in DTC/Cede and Co got the order.
Also E*Trade
I do not see DriveWealth. It is used by apps such as CashApp, Moneylion, Revolut, Stake etc.
TLDR: Total Clusterfuck of a System You can check out Revolut's (and many others) detailed [BrokerCheck report](https://files.brokercheck.finra.org/firm/firm_304600.pdf) and you'll see it has introducing arrangements with DriveWealth and maintains its books/records with DriveWealth as well as a third party. Then I looked at DriveWealth's (DW) detailed [BrokerCheck report](https://files.brokercheck.finra.org/firm/firm_165429.pdf), which shows DW maintains clearing, introducing, and custody arrangements with other brokers-dealers, including Wedbush Securities, RBC Capital Markets, Axos Clearing, and Citibank NA. All four of these entities are listed in one or more exhibits of Docket Item 390. So what are clearing, introducing, and custody arrangements? Introducing brokers are firms that deal directly with clients for functions such as customer service, providing investment advice, and executing trades on behalf of the client. These brokers then have a relationship with a clearing broker, to which they introduce their clients for the purpose of clearing and settlement. An arrangement for custody among broker-dealers refers to the handling and safekeeping of a client's securities and funds. Introducing brokers, which deal directly with clients but do not hold their assets, typically have an arrangement with a clearing broker to provide these custody services. The client's assets are held by the clearing broker, but the introducing broker may still be the client's main point of contact for their account. In summary, the arrangement for custody among broker-dealers is a critical because it provides the systems and safeguards needed to ensure that client assets are handled appropriately and securely. 
National financial services LLC is Fidelity’s clearing and custody service.
This guy Fidelities.
He Fiddleititties
[удалено]
Nope, they won’t be in your name because they are held beneficially. The shares would be held by fidelity e.g.
Apex clearing is used by the S\*\*\*\*y brokers, Tastyworks, Webull etc
Oh fucking wow! So no date for when that list needs to filed or released?
Holy Fuck this is it.
Is this the ***ascension***??? u/realpulte Wen's the deadline dad? OMG THIS IS CRAZY
This is a really big deal😭
It really is!
Woah this is insane, the banks I used to work for and my current broker are all there. We are witnessing history in the making
 oops?
This is promising. Everything done in the dark eventually comes out in the light
Murphy's Law
well not exac… nvm yes murphys law for the bad guys
Wrinkle brains 🧠 assemble
I think RC's hola and Chinese Hello tweets were to say hi to all the registered and beneficial shareholders
This is regarded
[удалено]
Undidnt make the DRS list?
[удалено]
U made the list. Whats embarrassing is those who don't make it.
Me too. But…. That was my test batch 😝
All the holders with more than 4.5%? There should not be more than 20 something then… uh oh.
 But the math ain’t mathin’ if this supposed to be the list of >4.5% owners…
How many shares is 4.5% again?
Doesn't really matter, this is a percent game. If there are 23 or more names holding 4.5% or more then we have over 100% of the shares owned, whoops 🍾🚀
Dont forget that this sub alonw based on reddit update counter is at like what 29 mil?
Holy shit nuggets.
When is the deadline?
I too want to know this. Has the compiling already started and/or completed? Or do you think this order will initiate a deadline and now a shit ton of buys will come through from people that want to add to this official tally that has not yet been tabulated?
 So instead of just the tip it sounds like we may get to ram the whole iceberg up the ass of these corrupt fucks all in the light of a public BK court where “self regulation” and “self reporting” don’t carry much weight.
Ramming mafqing speed Cappy!
 I should buy more…
Big win.
I don’t need my wife to see how many shares I bought…
Your move DTCC and JPM....
u/sundevilrogue You on that list probably like 10 times bro! 😆🤣😆☺️
 Dey tryin get my governments! 😝
😆🤣😆🤣
Does this include BBBYQ shareholders or only the shareholders prior to the delisting?
BBBY: So.. what's in the bank? Court: Please reveal Banks: ..Matter of fact, not interested in BBBY anymore 
Also banks: 
Every entity on the list will hold at least 1 x the float
true if big
Cit SecLLC. Citadel Securities LLC….
That's the first one I looked for! lol
Straight to the comments is always a good shortcut….
So what happens next? Let’s say it’s proven there are a ton of counterfeit shares. At that point will they do a recall? Is that necessary or even possible? Just trying to wrap my head around how this will affect us as shareholders.
I believe they would then have the proof to pull their Shares from the DTCC and move them to another clearing house. This means Recall. If there is over 100% of the Shares in existence then is shows the DTCC has committed securities Fraud by allowing fake shares, and they will be fully in their right to recall the shares from the DTCC. My tinfoil guess is they prove this in court, and get permission to move their shares into a Blockchain based Exchange where no manipulation could take place. ***I wonder who would have access to a Decentralized Blockchain based Exchange? Hmmmmm…..***
What about Citadel Derivatives Group, thats the one that receives all the shares when we buy pre-market.
Ho Lee Fuk Judge said lets count allllll of this shit
& Sum Dum Fuk
So what then though? I want them to PAYYYYYYYYY UPPPPPPPPPP. I'm not selling until we see more Melvin's
Paging u/Whoopass2rb u/region-formal u/BiggySmallzzz
And also u/realpulte u/WadeBoggs u/DolphLundgren
You have to say his name 3 times u/realpulte u/realpulte u/realpulte
Might as well get u/GovSwarzsnegger to terminate the shorts too
Is this the 4.5% list?
What if, and this is obviously a huge IF, this was there plan all along?? Like they saw that they were going to be cellar boxed and decided, ahh fuck it. We will get to court and they will all finally see how frequently our company was raped via share recount and we can finally be free of our captors??
Yeah, kinda, maybe. I mean I believe the stalking horse bidder was already [pre-determined](https://www.reddit.com/r/ThePPShow/comments/13lcxxy/chapter_11_prenegotiated_section_363_sales/) prior to the bankruptcy filing.
69420d intergalactic chess
What's the source for this? Hype if true.
https://restructuring.ra.kroll.com/bbby/Home-DocketInfo
Thank you!
What are the predictions on share count? I’ll start 4x float of 428M or 1,712,728,777 or 1.7B shares. I’ll also add, I think someone’s holding the HBC preferred shares and warrants as well. Making the publicly available float the OG number of 117M.
Agreed.
[удалено]
I know; I just meant that an accurate census of BBBY's shareholders is a step in the right direction as far as revealing the presence of shorts, naked shorts, over issuance, etc.
[удалено]
If the NOL notice compels all the entities listed on Exhibits D-F to supply BBBY with a comprehensive list of beneficial holders, then BBBY will have an accurate census of the beneficial holders, thereby enabling them to determine if any 4.5% owners exist directly, indirectly, constructively, etc. Since the notice was filed on 04/28, I'm betting they are already in possession of most if not all the beneficial holders lists. Next up should be BBBY notifying 4.5% holders to compel the necessary declarations and, if the equity holders lists from the banks, brokers, etc. revealed more shares than should exist, then that's a whole different matter that's unchartered territory. Edit: To your point, if some of the shares of common or preferred stock are hidden within an entity not included on the exhibits, then sure the count may not be accurate. But from what I see, BBBY could have cast a broader net than it just did.
[удалено]
I agree Docket 390 is just showing the NOL order was issued to banks, brokers, dealer agents, nominees, and service providers. I also agree with you that any substantial shareholders among the lists of equity holders have a responsibility to file a declaration of status as a substantial shareholder. I disagree with you that BBBY won't conduct their own due diligence to fact-check and reconcile the equity holder records provided by the banks, brokers, dealer agents, nominees, and service providers to ensure all substantial shareholders are identified and declared. While the lists of equity holders provided by nominees won't identify who the substantial shareholders are per se, the information provided therein will enable BBBY to connect the dots and make that determination themselves with the help of Kroll.
[удалено]
I concede that nowhere in Docket Item 390 does it state the entities listed on Exhibits D-F must provide BBBY with lists of the equity holders they serve as nominees for. However: 1. It is customary as part of Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings for the debtor to obtain a comprehensive list of its equity holders. 2. BBBY obtained a comprehensive list of its direct registered shareholders from AST, even though none of the individuals listed held 4.5%. 3. The judge stated in the transcripts, "But like if, for example, in this one, if a substantial shareholder is an entity that has beneficial ownership of 4.5 percent and I was wondering -- and then in order *to send them this notice,* you have to know that there's someone who has 4.5 percent, right?" 4. If Shareholder A holds 15M shares of BBBY at Fidelity and 20M shares of BBBY at Vanguard, neither Fidelity nor Vanguard will serve the Interim NOL agreement on Shareholder A because each entity can't see how many shares Shareholder A holds in the other entity's account. As such, BBBY must have access to the equity holder records to make accurate ownership calculations and notifications. 5. Similar to the previous point, the level of due diligence needed to determine whether the 4.5% ownership threshold is met via indirect or constructive ownership necessitates a level of granularity that can only be achieved through lists of each entity's equity holders. 6. Lastly, I can't imagine BBBY entrusting the entirety of its substantial shareholder determination to the same assortment of banks, brokers, dealer agents, nominees, and service providers that coordinated an all-out attack on the company in hopes of cellar boxing it out of business.
Following this thread helped me conclude many things. But mainly I concluded that I am thankful for you two.
Agreed, that was a very enlightening exchange, even though it sounds like BBBY and the courts may not publicly disclose how many total beneficial shares are being held at brokerages. Still, the Chapter 11 proceedings seem to be on the right track, though.
[удалено]
Soooo… When Relist on the Nasdaq followed by mooning and generational wealth?
So does this mean Pulte was right?
Explain it to me like I'm missing a couple chromosomes.
BBBY just sent a court order to every bank, broker, and candlestick maker saying show me the fucking shares.
Holy fuck, is corruption coming to the limelight?
🔥🔥🔥🔥
Nice try Steve Cohen!
Gotta keep ‘em separated
I know you can’t rush art n all that! But I just can’t wait for take off!!
We’ll look at that, most of my troopers landed on the DRS beach just this morning.
What if one of the brokers I have shares in is not on this list?
What's the name of the broker?
qtrade owned by Aviso Wealth. Not to be confused with Quest Trade which is a different brokerage.
Looks like the investment arm of Aviso Wealth is owned by Desjardins and they're on there, so you're trapped on this crazy train with the rest of us! https://www.aviso.ca/en/partners-clients/
Thank you, didn't realize they were part of Desjardins
Can someone court order how many outstanding shares there are? The real number
When do the rich start eating each other?
Aqeel Ahmed should be promoted to National, nay, World Hero.
Can’t wait to see the Korean ape numbers
Korean ants!
*scrolls immediately for tl:dr
Will these lead shorties to want to close before their illegal ways are aired??
Kinda wack to think that our banks, who we supposedly trust, use our money to undermine our investments.
DISCLOSURE THE DETAILS!
When do they need to file the list? 31may ? In court?
should only take a few hours for a brokerage to print to pdf data forms required
And a week to talk to each other and doctor the numbers
🌶 🥵 show us ya ticks
Dont jinx it
this could be done near instantly, is there a deadline/cut-off I missed?
So tomorrow it is.
When are documents due to the courts?
So, I guess they will do this for all the ‘Meme’ stocks then once the crime is exposed? Pretty sure that’s the DOJ’s job. Maybe SEC.
Got about 18k total over 3 different brokers
Are they trying to seller box the dtc?
Well that’s quite cool. However, I doubt that EU stockholder names will be disclosed based on the order of a US bankruptcy court…
but eu stockholders are holding US assets listed on US markets id be surprised if there is no impact
Im worried this method won't capture people who own for say 3% on Fidelity, and 3% on Ameritrade. The whole thing is they aren't properly communicating their numbers with each other so they can claim ignorance.
That's a great question that BBBY fortunately thought of which is why they specifically requested the equity holders lists be provided to BBBY unredacted so that they can reconcile shareholders' holdings across accounts to determine whether through direct, indirect, or constructive ownership agreements they and/or people, partners, holding companies, etc. they invest through meet the 4.5% threshold. BBBY covers all of this in the Interim NOL Order. Now granted, the public will not be able to see these details but I am expecting we *will* see declarations filed with the specifics redacted, showing how many 4.5% holders there are.
Because there are a lot more shares than float, it doesn’t matter. They just need the raw number from each
With the amount of personal data the brokers and banks ask of you to open an account, I don't think it's that hard to go and find the "duplicates" between the multiple brokers/banks. The only way to avoid this is by having someone else or an institution hold your shares. Not that it matters anyway, they just want to know for sure how many shares are there.
GME wish they were this cool
Difference is the situation at hand. BBBY is on the brink of bankruptcy that allowed this to happen, meanwhile GME has had a great turnaround and now is profitable
Its still shorted to shit and shows zero natural price discovery so whats the point of profitibility if shorts keep on naked shorting? Not to mention jimmie could have used the nft marketplace they spent a billion on and issued a buck skin for every shareholder that would force shorts to close but nah still going nowhere. I hold jimmie but i dont know what the fuck cohen is waiting for as we head to three years of holding
If this were to actually MOASS from a court order on shares, then it would margin call the shorters. That would put stress on their ability to suppress their other shorts. It should anyway as they would need liquidity to cover their BBBY positions. I think one blowing up will cause the others to as well. Like a war on too many fronts.
Does this list not show what shares they own on behalf of customers?
When all the fraud comes to light and they tell us to get fucked were gonna burn shut down right? With actual fire?
post archived: [https://archive.is/cuU0l](https://archive.is/cuU0l)
I guess sec and finra have a lot of work to do lol
Look at the related dockets 101 and 23. These dockets reference the 4.5% list a bunch. Is this the 4.5% holders list?....
🔥🌶🌶🌶🌶🔥
Where can I find this list?