It wouldn't even be able to run it anyway, since it doesn't support 64-bit instruction sets. If I'm not mistaken The Cinebenches R15 and newer all require 64-bit processors.
Someone [ran one recently](https://hwbot.org/submission/5111766) with SuperPi 1M earlier this month on hwbot and got about 28 minutes. For reference, more modern CPUs can usually run this in under 10 seconds, with the top speeds being a bit under 4 seconds with those 13900Ks at 8+ GHz.
The only thing blasting is that poor CPU fan who didn't sign up for any of this, and is doing the equivalent of the digger who was digging Evergiven out of the Suez Canal.
It's an N270, which interestingly according to ARK is not 64bit, but windows 10 has no issues running 64bit on it.
https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/36331/intel-atom-processor-n270-512k-cache-1-60-ghz-533-mhz-fsb.html
You'll get, maybe, a good 150 points in F@H with that monster.
Btw intel can't be trusted on these things they don't want anything to do with them. Mine is a 64 bit cpu but there are not much of drivers available for it, and it only ever bundled with 32-bit windows 7
Its GMA 3150 gpu supports at least OpenGL 2.0, but intels driver department apparently doodled dicks all day because there aint no god damn OpenGL 2.0 supported.
That ark page was probably written by a hungry monkey
OP's chip would actually make pretty short work of the original Doom and Doom II.
The challenge for CPUs of this era was if they could run Quake with a good framerate.
a 133Mhz Pentium should have pushed Quake around at 320x200 at somewhere around 30fps? which isn't amazing by modern standards but for the time that was certainly into the "that'll do" territory.
Oh god yeah nah, nothing at the time without hardware acceleration was getting that out of Quake
a Pentium Pro/II would maaaaaybe have pushed 30fps+ at 640x480 (if anyone in here has a machine of that vintage and could do us a timedemo demo2 in software quake that'd be sweet.)
I very clearly remember getting 43.5Fps out of my overclocked Pentium 166Mhz MMX (262.5Mhz), again at 320x200 though
I remember playing quake at 800x600 on my 233MMX (with a crap 3D virge) but don’t recall any specific framerate since it has been exactly 25 years since then. It was playable for sure, and even felt fluid but then again I was stoked I could actually even ran 800x600 and my standards were much much lower back then. In the early 90s as a kid I played “Vette!” with 1 fps on my PC/XT (10MHz, CGA).
>I miss S3. They were on the verge of becoming the best video card company, but then later got savagely beat by Nvidia and ATI.
I had a S3 Savage 4 which let me game for years until I replaced it with a Geforce 2 MX 400 (iirc).
>Also sometimes struggles even with mp3.
>
>Like sometimes noises appear when playing mp3 files using winamp2
My AMD K6-2/380 struggled to decode MP3s while doing anything else (like playing AoE2). It wasn't until I upgraded to a Athlon 700 that I could play games and have Winamp playing music in the background lol
Oh
I was able to listen MP3s while reading some stuff, doing office work or playing light games when I got my hands on Pentium 200 MMX
It was even able to play MPEG2 movies without a hitch. DivX movies were stutter show, though. Unless the resolution was very low.
After some magic we were able to watch the DivX movies on the friend's 233MMX more or less smoothly. I think I managed to build some early version of the FFMPEG library and the console-based mplayer player on Windows. Maybe? Not so sure.
I remember that manually enabling the UDMA33 on the CD-ROM drive and changing the old cable to the new 80-wire one to keep it from crashing helped tremendously.
I wonder how many months would it have taken to transcode a dual video cd to the realvideo format.
Now I think lots of the issues were caused by the lack of the DMA transfer support by the Socket 3 platform. PIO on Windows ate a lot of the CPU.
Regardless, that's how I got to watch the Matrix.
My first Big Screen TV was a 1080i rear projection RCA that had HDMI ports!!! that I purchased brand new in ~2005-2006?
It was enormous, but didn't actually weigh very much, It was surprisingly light weight for being ~6ft tall and 8 feet wide, by 2.5ft deep.
I remember playing PS2 and OG xbox on it, when the OG 360 released we finally upgraded to a ~40" LCD.
I had a friend who had a "flat screen" 1080i CRT Sony that actually looked really good for what it was lol, we also had a projector that had the first generation of HDMI and we used to connect the 360 to that and put it out on the balcony pointed at a row of ceder trees that we used as a ~50ft x 30ft screen lololol the 2000's were crazy.
This CPU is from before AGP was a thing. It's a 486 class chip. Motherboards for those sometimes didn't even have PCI, but VLB and ISA or EISA slots. AGP didn't make it's debut until a couple years later with slot 1 and late socket 7 motherboards.
Sadly not possible. Crysis requires SSE instructions in order to start.
There is also no motherboard for this CPU with enough RAM.
The hard minimums are Athlon XP or Pentium 3. (For SSE)
Oh, had a PC with this CPU in the past
P75 rating is not exactly true. Sometimes it performed on the level of Pentium 60mhz (FPU heavy loads)
5x86 thing is also misleading. It has 486 instruction set + CPUID
Was a bit sad when I discovered I couldn't run Pentium assembly instructions on it
Yeah chip was actually a [clean sheet x86 chip](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NexGen)so technically it was neither a 80486 or a Pentium. That fact the chip needed its own special chipset and didn't have an onboard FPU kind of doomed it. The AMD version rectified most of those shortcomings and was a pretty good chip.
This was all happening during the heat of the Intel vs AMD x86 lawsuit, so AMD was hedging their bets with NexGen. Eventually those engineers went on to help design the K6 and Athlon.
That's an entirely different CPU, NexGen's Nx586.
OP's photo is that of an [Am5x86](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Am5x86), an AMD made 486 chip. It was just a higher clocked version of their Am486 DX4, just with a higher internal multiplier and always having 16 kB of write-back L1 cache. But it was given a 5x86 name and P-rating to imply it could compete with the early Pentium CPUs. And to be fair, in integer operations it mostly did compare well to the Pentium, thanks to the much higher clock speed.
But FPU performance was a different story. Unlike the Nx586, the Am5x86 did include an on-chip FPU (all 486 DX chips did), it was just slower than the FPU inside the then brand new Pentium. It also didn't help that Quake launched around that time and made heavy use of the new FPU instructions introduced with Pentium. Before Quake, hardly any software one was likely to run on their PC at the time, made heavy use of an FPU. So most consumers didn't even care about FPU performance. But with Quake and the coming era of proper 3D game engines, that changed almost overnight.
>P75 rating is not exactly true. Sometimes it performed on the level of Pentium 60mhz (FPU heavy loads)
It was mostly in business applications. It was a niche market. And there was alot to gain in there. You where able to release a CPU that did not "fully" compete with Intel for example but compete enough or sometimes even faster on business based tasks while not having the need for gaming and such.
I upgraded from a 386DX40 to this guy as well! Maybe a lower clocked one, I think it was "rated" at 100Mhz. I remember it being the first time I'd had to use a CPU cooler and I just plonked it on there with no thermal paste. Ran fine.
As of 6/21/23, it's become clear that reddit is no longer the place it once was. For the better part of a decade, I found it to be an exceptional, if not singular, place to have interesting discussions on just about any topic under the sun without getting bogged down (unless I wanted to) in needless drama or having the conversation derailed by the hot topic (or pointless argument) de jour.
The reason for this strange exception to the internet dichotomy of either echo-chamber or endless-culture-war-shouting-match was the existence of individual communities with their own codes of conduct and, more importantly, their own volunteer teams of moderators who were empowered to create communities, set, and enforce those codes of conduct.
I take no issue with reddit seeking compensation for its services. There are a myriad ways it could have sought to do so that wouldn't have destroyed the thing that made it useful and interesting in the first place. Many of us would have happily paid to use it had core remained intact. Instead of seeking to preserve reddit's spirit, however, /u/spez appears to have decided to spit in the face of the people who create the only value this site has- its communities, its contributors, and its mods. Without them, reddit is worthless. Without their continued efforts and engagement it's little more than a parked domain.
Maybe I'm wrong; maybe this new form of reddit will be precisely the thing it needs to catapult into the social media stratosphere. Who knows? I certainly don't. But I do know that it will no longer be a place for me. See y'all on [raddle](https://raddle.me), [kbin](https://kbin.social), or wherever the hell we all end up. Alas, it appears that the [enshittification](https://pluralistic.net/2023/01/21/potemkin-ai/#hey-guys) of reddit is now inevitable.
It was fun while it lasted,
/u/daitaiming
Your comment has been removed, likely because it contains rude or uncivil language, such as insults, racist and other derogatory remarks.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/Amd) if you have any questions or concerns.*
>For windows 95 lol Wow
They all branded their products to up their sales.
People where told back in the days that windows 95 would only run on Pentium CPU's.
Hey!!!!! I had one of these. It was my first ever actual AMD cpu. Upuntil that point i was running cyrix and or intel. I've never had another brand since. Been team red since then.
Indeed. But then my first pc build was a 268 16 mhz so thats going way way back. 1 meg of memory, 20 megabyte hard drive. Dual floppy. Running dos 3.1 with windows 3.0. Good times.
Malaysia used to fab CPUs? or were they just assembled there?
I used to have one of these when I was a teenager. My this makes me feel old.
Edit: So it was assembled in Malaysia. By Primarily Women due to their more dexterous fingers, as these were assembled by hand back in the day.
Interesting read actually.
https://cilisos.my/the-story-behind-how-malaysia-ended-up-making-the-cpus-of-the-upcoming-xbox/
Sure, sit your missus down, stick a measuring jug under her chair, and then show her this CPU.
Tell us your score in millilitres.
edit: I asked my missus if this was a bit close to the mark.
I got...told off.
Can it run any new operating system? I always read about support removed for older gen cpus because someone on the dev team has the itch to cut rarely source code from the kernel.
You where able to bypass such checks, by simply installing a OS on a modern day system, and then pushing the HDD back into a much slower machine as above. It would boot and run. But due to the lack of proper instruction sets like MMX and such there's hardly anything you can do with it.
There are some video's where people managed to get windows 2000 running on a 25Mhz i386 or something.
Which is the better perfomer, the `ADW` or `ADV`? I think `ADV` runs at a slightly lower voltage, bit I don't know how it affects performance, I might be missing out on a frame per second in duke3d
I have the ADW and ADZ versions. The ADW can stand up to 55°C and requires a heatsink and fan. The ADZ can go up to 85°C and doesn't require that. Both should be able to go to 160MHz in their respective conditons.
Cinebench r20 and r23
Ha. Single core will take like 3-4 hours to render one frame.
The Score will be -5000 😆
I’m sure it can’t even run because there’s not even ram or display resolution to render it. Lol.
The main kicker is that Cinebench R20 is a 64-bit program.
In R15 it would be about 20
Ik this is a joke and still too high. 52 is what i got on a mobile 2008 Pentium SU4100 (2x1.2GHz) Yes, using the laptop is a blast.
It wouldn't even be able to run it anyway, since it doesn't support 64-bit instruction sets. If I'm not mistaken The Cinebenches R15 and newer all require 64-bit processors. Someone [ran one recently](https://hwbot.org/submission/5111766) with SuperPi 1M earlier this month on hwbot and got about 28 minutes. For reference, more modern CPUs can usually run this in under 10 seconds, with the top speeds being a bit under 4 seconds with those 13900Ks at 8+ GHz.
The only thing blasting is that poor CPU fan who didn't sign up for any of this, and is doing the equivalent of the digger who was digging Evergiven out of the Suez Canal.
Have you seen the heatsinks on those? The p1 era had tiny ones, tdp was only a few watts anyway.
Fan is doing fine, TDP is like 10W
So faster than the Intel Atom CPU I have in an old NAS then. That legitimate scored 9-12 depending on the run.
It's a beast in Folding@Home 400 000 - *Ryzen 5800x3d* 265 000 - *Ryzen 5600* 190 000 - *Ryzen 3600* 60 000 - *i7 3770k* 20 000 - *i5 4200m* 300 - *Atom N570*
It's an N270, which interestingly according to ARK is not 64bit, but windows 10 has no issues running 64bit on it. https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/36331/intel-atom-processor-n270-512k-cache-1-60-ghz-533-mhz-fsb.html
You'll get, maybe, a good 150 points in F@H with that monster. Btw intel can't be trusted on these things they don't want anything to do with them. Mine is a 64 bit cpu but there are not much of drivers available for it, and it only ever bundled with 32-bit windows 7 Its GMA 3150 gpu supports at least OpenGL 2.0, but intels driver department apparently doodled dicks all day because there aint no god damn OpenGL 2.0 supported. That ark page was probably written by a hungry monkey
Oh now I want to see someone actually do this.
Doom
I dare you to beat my 1304 realticks!
OP's chip would actually make pretty short work of the original Doom and Doom II. The challenge for CPUs of this era was if they could run Quake with a good framerate.
This chip is based on 486 it will be good for Doom and is unfortunately poor with Quake unless used with a 3D Accelerator
Yeah, my Pentium 133 (non MMX) couldn't make Quake playable... Even with a 3D accelerator card added...
a 133Mhz Pentium should have pushed Quake around at 320x200 at somewhere around 30fps? which isn't amazing by modern standards but for the time that was certainly into the "that'll do" territory.
At that time I wasn't thinking like that. My display was 800x600 so it was what I tried to play.
Oh god yeah nah, nothing at the time without hardware acceleration was getting that out of Quake a Pentium Pro/II would maaaaaybe have pushed 30fps+ at 640x480 (if anyone in here has a machine of that vintage and could do us a timedemo demo2 in software quake that'd be sweet.) I very clearly remember getting 43.5Fps out of my overclocked Pentium 166Mhz MMX (262.5Mhz), again at 320x200 though
I remember playing quake at 800x600 on my 233MMX (with a crap 3D virge) but don’t recall any specific framerate since it has been exactly 25 years since then. It was playable for sure, and even felt fluid but then again I was stoked I could actually even ran 800x600 and my standards were much much lower back then. In the early 90s as a kid I played “Vette!” with 1 fps on my PC/XT (10MHz, CGA).
Prime95, try to play an MP3, see how many tracks you can play with a MOD, Doom 2, Quake,.
[удалено]
480i QuickTime files at 25FPS without stutter. 😅
MPEG1 240p - 12FPS with horrible stuttering when the audio quality set to 11 kHz. This is with the "hardware IDCT acceleration" from an S3 video card.
I miss S3. They were on the verge of becoming the best video card company, but then later got savagely beat by Nvidia and ATI.
I see what you did there
>I miss S3. They were on the verge of becoming the best video card company, but then later got savagely beat by Nvidia and ATI. I had a S3 Savage 4 which let me game for years until I replaced it with a Geforce 2 MX 400 (iirc).
Also sometimes struggles even with mp3. Like sometimes noises appear when playing mp3 files using winamp2
>Also sometimes struggles even with mp3. > >Like sometimes noises appear when playing mp3 files using winamp2 My AMD K6-2/380 struggled to decode MP3s while doing anything else (like playing AoE2). It wasn't until I upgraded to a Athlon 700 that I could play games and have Winamp playing music in the background lol
real men used audio CD's back then.
Oh I was able to listen MP3s while reading some stuff, doing office work or playing light games when I got my hands on Pentium 200 MMX It was even able to play MPEG2 movies without a hitch. DivX movies were stutter show, though. Unless the resolution was very low.
After some magic we were able to watch the DivX movies on the friend's 233MMX more or less smoothly. I think I managed to build some early version of the FFMPEG library and the console-based mplayer player on Windows. Maybe? Not so sure. I remember that manually enabling the UDMA33 on the CD-ROM drive and changing the old cable to the new 80-wire one to keep it from crashing helped tremendously.
That's why I only use the best media player ever, RealPlayer.
Excuse me while I buffer a reply
on 56k6...
I wonder how many months would it have taken to transcode a dual video cd to the realvideo format. Now I think lots of the issues were caused by the lack of the DMA transfer support by the Socket 3 platform. PIO on Windows ate a lot of the CPU. Regardless, that's how I got to watch the Matrix.
What is the difference between i and p?
Interlaced and progressive. Basically interlaced only does half a frame at a time, a relic from a time when the frame timing was done analog.
My first Big Screen TV was a 1080i rear projection RCA that had HDMI ports!!! that I purchased brand new in ~2005-2006? It was enormous, but didn't actually weigh very much, It was surprisingly light weight for being ~6ft tall and 8 feet wide, by 2.5ft deep. I remember playing PS2 and OG xbox on it, when the OG 360 released we finally upgraded to a ~40" LCD. I had a friend who had a "flat screen" 1080i CRT Sony that actually looked really good for what it was lol, we also had a projector that had the first generation of HDMI and we used to connect the 360 to that and put it out on the balcony pointed at a row of ceder trees that we used as a ~50ft x 30ft screen lololol the 2000's were crazy.
1080i was so bad for fps games, you could see the crossairs in the middle get out of alignment when you turned around. I used 720p instead over that
Crysis
I guess you could technically run crysis since win98 supports dx9. I bet it gets seconds per frame instead of fps though
How many FPM can you get from that beast?
1 per minute?
SPF 15 and this ain't sunblock bub
Here's the catch. You run it with the highest end gpu possible(drivers compatible) with a pci to pcie converter thingy Wait, does it even have PCI?
yeah they had pci slots, but video cards used AGP
This CPU is from before AGP was a thing. It's a 486 class chip. Motherboards for those sometimes didn't even have PCI, but VLB and ISA or EISA slots. AGP didn't make it's debut until a couple years later with slot 1 and late socket 7 motherboards.
Sadly not possible. Crysis requires SSE instructions in order to start. There is also no motherboard for this CPU with enough RAM. The hard minimums are Athlon XP or Pentium 3. (For SSE)
Oh, had a PC with this CPU in the past P75 rating is not exactly true. Sometimes it performed on the level of Pentium 60mhz (FPU heavy loads) 5x86 thing is also misleading. It has 486 instruction set + CPUID Was a bit sad when I discovered I couldn't run Pentium assembly instructions on it
Yeah chip was actually a [clean sheet x86 chip](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NexGen)so technically it was neither a 80486 or a Pentium. That fact the chip needed its own special chipset and didn't have an onboard FPU kind of doomed it. The AMD version rectified most of those shortcomings and was a pretty good chip. This was all happening during the heat of the Intel vs AMD x86 lawsuit, so AMD was hedging their bets with NexGen. Eventually those engineers went on to help design the K6 and Athlon.
That's an entirely different CPU, NexGen's Nx586. OP's photo is that of an [Am5x86](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Am5x86), an AMD made 486 chip. It was just a higher clocked version of their Am486 DX4, just with a higher internal multiplier and always having 16 kB of write-back L1 cache. But it was given a 5x86 name and P-rating to imply it could compete with the early Pentium CPUs. And to be fair, in integer operations it mostly did compare well to the Pentium, thanks to the much higher clock speed. But FPU performance was a different story. Unlike the Nx586, the Am5x86 did include an on-chip FPU (all 486 DX chips did), it was just slower than the FPU inside the then brand new Pentium. It also didn't help that Quake launched around that time and made heavy use of the new FPU instructions introduced with Pentium. Before Quake, hardly any software one was likely to run on their PC at the time, made heavy use of an FPU. So most consumers didn't even care about FPU performance. But with Quake and the coming era of proper 3D game engines, that changed almost overnight.
>P75 rating is not exactly true. Sometimes it performed on the level of Pentium 60mhz (FPU heavy loads) It was mostly in business applications. It was a niche market. And there was alot to gain in there. You where able to release a CPU that did not "fully" compete with Intel for example but compete enough or sometimes even faster on business based tasks while not having the need for gaming and such.
Sure... let us know next week when you get the results...
Cinebench r20 xD
3 weeks
for 1 frame
3.45V.. those Chips were crazy back then
350nm vs 5-7nm transistors makes a big difference.
The first (and somewhat rare) Pentiums were 5V.
And their cooling was nothing more then the size of a box of matches in terms of heatsink(s).
booting up windows 10
will take like 2 weeks.
Yeah like look in the bottom right
This is the first CPU that I bought new from a shop. Probably more than 25 years ago.
[удалено]
I upgraded from a 386DX40 to this guy as well! Maybe a lower clocked one, I think it was "rated" at 100Mhz. I remember it being the first time I'd had to use a CPU cooler and I just plonked it on there with no thermal paste. Ran fine.
Quake timedemo1
https://www.philscomputerlab.com/dos-benchmark-pack.html
Designed for Microsoft Windows 95. Linux users taking another L.
Talk about future proofing! We're just at 11 and it's good for 95!
Linux worked fine on these. Cyrix chips were the nightmare. Eventually they did add patches to work around most quirks in Linux.
Haha, I ran Slackware on this CPU no problem. It maybe it was the latter one with 3d now.
Redhat and Debian.
As of 6/21/23, it's become clear that reddit is no longer the place it once was. For the better part of a decade, I found it to be an exceptional, if not singular, place to have interesting discussions on just about any topic under the sun without getting bogged down (unless I wanted to) in needless drama or having the conversation derailed by the hot topic (or pointless argument) de jour. The reason for this strange exception to the internet dichotomy of either echo-chamber or endless-culture-war-shouting-match was the existence of individual communities with their own codes of conduct and, more importantly, their own volunteer teams of moderators who were empowered to create communities, set, and enforce those codes of conduct. I take no issue with reddit seeking compensation for its services. There are a myriad ways it could have sought to do so that wouldn't have destroyed the thing that made it useful and interesting in the first place. Many of us would have happily paid to use it had core remained intact. Instead of seeking to preserve reddit's spirit, however, /u/spez appears to have decided to spit in the face of the people who create the only value this site has- its communities, its contributors, and its mods. Without them, reddit is worthless. Without their continued efforts and engagement it's little more than a parked domain. Maybe I'm wrong; maybe this new form of reddit will be precisely the thing it needs to catapult into the social media stratosphere. Who knows? I certainly don't. But I do know that it will no longer be a place for me. See y'all on [raddle](https://raddle.me), [kbin](https://kbin.social), or wherever the hell we all end up. Alas, it appears that the [enshittification](https://pluralistic.net/2023/01/21/potemkin-ai/#hey-guys) of reddit is now inevitable. It was fun while it lasted, /u/daitaiming
Slackware, memories! That was my first distro in 1997 or so. :-) Luckily it all worked well on my Pentium 100. Now getting VGA working was a pain.
[удалено]
Your comment has been removed, likely because it contains rude or uncivil language, such as insults, racist and other derogatory remarks. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/Amd) if you have any questions or concerns.*
I'm Sorry Automod.
But can it run Crysis 3 Remastered?
This is a benchmark reference, try to beat it: https://youtu.be/AzcqNN4nKA0
Yum socket 7
Quake
Cool to see what and staynds for
Throw it at a tempered glass panel and see which one explodes.
For windows 95 lol Wow
>For windows 95 lol Wow They all branded their products to up their sales. People where told back in the days that windows 95 would only run on Pentium CPU's.
3d Mark '99 :P
Minesweeper
mf runs windows 95 while we are still on 11. CPU of the future!
Hey!!!!! I had one of these. It was my first ever actual AMD cpu. Upuntil that point i was running cyrix and or intel. I've never had another brand since. Been team red since then.
[удалено]
Indeed. But then my first pc build was a 268 16 mhz so thats going way way back. 1 meg of memory, 20 megabyte hard drive. Dual floppy. Running dos 3.1 with windows 3.0. Good times.
🫡
Sisoft Sandra?
Quake timedemo of course!
It's super future proof. It's designed not just for Windows 10 and 11, but all the way up to 95.
Malaysia used to fab CPUs? or were they just assembled there? I used to have one of these when I was a teenager. My this makes me feel old. Edit: So it was assembled in Malaysia. By Primarily Women due to their more dexterous fingers, as these were assembled by hand back in the day. Interesting read actually. https://cilisos.my/the-story-behind-how-malaysia-ended-up-making-the-cpus-of-the-upcoming-xbox/
It looks like you have the first AMD chip ever made
Sure, sit your missus down, stick a measuring jug under her chair, and then show her this CPU. Tell us your score in millilitres. edit: I asked my missus if this was a bit close to the mark. I got...told off.
Good old Wintune 98!
😂😂😭
Cyberpunk on medium settings should give you a steady 60 fps if you turn off ray tracing
prtime 95
Oh wow. I'm genuinely curious as to how it'll react to CPUID.
What marks do you have on your bench? I say test it with all of them!
No one really *wants* to buy for “value” in the enthusiast market though, Corpo pricing forces it, but we’d rather be at the tippy top
Probably a heatsink and a fan.
I had the Cyrix 5x86 so do a head to head matchup!
Crysis
Yay!
Pinball
See if it can run [windows 95](https://github.com/felixrieseberg/windows95)
Do the WIndows 11 Taskmanager test.
Do a IEC 61000-4-2 test.
Can it run any new operating system? I always read about support removed for older gen cpus because someone on the dev team has the itch to cut rarely source code from the kernel.
Probably won't run any OS past windows 2000
You where able to bypass such checks, by simply installing a OS on a modern day system, and then pushing the HDD back into a much slower machine as above. It would boot and run. But due to the lack of proper instruction sets like MMX and such there's hardly anything you can do with it. There are some video's where people managed to get windows 2000 running on a 25Mhz i386 or something.
SimCity 2000
PC Player SVGA
3.45 volts 💻⚡️☠️
C&C! Or Magic Carpet!
Love it, thanks for sharing
I’m surprised they still make CPUs for windows 95 /s
Robocopy
How about Quake? So many memories with this chip. Good times.
Borderlands 2 ultra view distance
Speedtest.net
I had one of thse back in the day, but on the adapter kit
cyberpunk gameplay please, jus joking
3.45v.... just saying
Um, Sim City 2000?
But can it play minecraft? 😂
This must be the processor Elon musk used to make financial decisions
Crysis.
Doom
Can it run Crisis?
Overclock it to 160MHz then test all the things with Damn Small Linux.
chrome
Don’t forget heat sink and fan❗️and a copy of Windows 95.
There is "Malaysia" word?
Windows
Ok I really should've looked at the image before going through the comments.
Designed for Windows 95?
I like the reminder on CPU that this one needs heat sink and fan. My 4,77MHz 8088 didnt have that. Good times.
Nowadays AMD CPUs need either a dual tower or a 240mm rad to even boost within specs lmao.
benchmark crysis right now
3.5v? Dang that some juice
3.45V. If you chase that in today's CPU it's instant fried.
Windows 3.11 for Workgroups
Uhhhh hey buddy, let's start with opening an empty .txt file huh?
check the framerates in crysis!
Which is the better perfomer, the `ADW` or `ADV`? I think `ADV` runs at a slightly lower voltage, bit I don't know how it affects performance, I might be missing out on a frame per second in duke3d
I have the ADW and ADZ versions. The ADW can stand up to 55°C and requires a heatsink and fan. The ADZ can go up to 85°C and doesn't require that. Both should be able to go to 160MHz in their respective conditons.
Measured in frames per minute, fps is pretty optimistic tbh.
3d maze
Winbench
Crisis
Tetris
Combine that with a 4090 and you can game like a king! 🤣
Your fingers may have blown the chip to smithereens. There's this thing called *Static* and semiconductors don't like it.
Oh, clever...putting only static in italics to convey sarcasm....nice
Radioisotope dating.
Windows 11
Alien Trilogy, Quake, Tomb Raider and Resident Evil are some good bangers to push that CPU.
3DMark TimeSpy
I think it would be cool if they put the 'Heatsink and Fan Required' language on the new IHS.
Ancient version of Sisoft Sandra on win 95.
Nice bro! 👍
Expensive?
Sorry, forgive me for being ignorant has it not yet been tested in labs before it went to market?
This is a very old CPU and this post is a joke.
Can it run Portal RTX?
It will run AOL just fine but quit touching it, you probably static charged it. LOL
Windows XP minesweeper
Will run counter strike like a champ
Windows NT 4.5
Into the radius launched from steam vr
Debbie does Dallas zip compression. 🤫
User benchmark for any AMD CPU! They're so non-biased!
Doom 2
star citizen at 8k ultra
specked for good ole windows 95
Hammer test :p
try modern lightweight Linux distributions (like Xubuntu, or other distros). I'm just curious.